en pl
en pl

Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem

Show issue
Year 3/2023 
Volume 15 
Issue 1

What We Talk About When We Talk About the Principle of the Active Role of the Court in Administrative Procedure

Yerik Akhmetov
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan

Yermek Abdrasulov
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan

3/2023 15 (1) Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem

DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.572

Article contents

Abstract

The article examines the application of the principle of the active role of the court in the administrative proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan and foreign countries. The attention is paid mainly to the identification of the main function and the system of application of this principle. The scientific novelty lies in the study of important subordinate guiding principles, the influence of which is decisive when applying the principle of the active role of the court in the administrative proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The authors conclude that the judge should apply the principle of the active role of the court in order to have a fair trial within a reasonable time.

References

  1. Azarevich D., Pravda v grazhdanskom processe, “Zhurnal Grazhdanskogo i Ugolovnogo Prava” 1888, 1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Daci J., Legal Principles, Legal Values and Legal Norms: Are They the Same or Different?, “Academicus International Scientific Journal” 2010, 2. [Google Scholar]
  3. Davydov K.V., Special’nye principy administrativnyh procedur, “Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo” 2020, 2, pp. 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  4. Galligan D., Polyanskij V.V., Starilov Yu.N., Administrativnoe pravo: istoriya razvitiya i osnovnye sovremennye koncepcii, Moskva 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huysmans J., The Role of Formal Principles in Legal Reasoning, “Policy Within and Through Law” 2015, 1, pp. 237–259. [Google Scholar]
  6. Koblikov A.S., Yuridicheskaya etika, Moskva 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mahina S.N., Teoriya dokazyvaniya i dokazatel’stv v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve: stanovlenie i razvitie, “Administrativnoe Pravo i Process” 2016, 2. [Google Scholar]
  8. Manaliev E.K., Osnovnye principy administrativnogo processa v proekte administrativno-processual’nogo kodeksa Kyrgyzskoj Respubliki, [in:] Ezhegodnik publichnogo prava 2015: Administrativnyj process, Moskva 2015, p. 464. [Google Scholar]
  9. Načisčionis J., Urmonas A., Administrative Law in the Sphere of Public Policy upon Restoration of Independence of Latvia and Lithuania, “Public Policy and Administration” 2021, 20(11), pp. 127–143. [Google Scholar]
  10. Orlov A.V., Aktivnaya rol’ suda v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve, “Ros. Sud’ya” 2016, 8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Poillot E., The True Story of the Active Role of Courts in Consumer Litigation: Introduction to the Speech Given by Etienne Rigal, [in:] A.M. Mancaleoni, E. Poillot (eds.), National Judges and the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Rome 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. Popova Yu.A., Zashchita publichno-pravovyh interesov grazhdan v sudah obshchej yurisdikcii, Krasnodar 2001. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sarpekov R., Konussova V., Nurgazinov B., Formation and Development of Administrative Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, “Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues” 2021, 24(4). [Google Scholar]
  14. Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V., Sudebnaya praktika v pravovoj real’nosti Rossii: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya, “RUDN Journal of Law” 2021, 25(3), pp. 545–561. [Google Scholar]
  15. Solov’ev A.A., Nekotorye osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Federativnoj Respublike Germaniya, “Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo Suda Moskovskogo Okruga” 2015, 4, pp. 92–100. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sossin L., Future of Administrative Justice, “Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice” 2008, 21, pp. 192–222. [Google Scholar]
  17. Strogovich M.S., Problemy sudebnoj etiki, Moskva 1974, p. 272. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yablochkov T.M., Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva, Yaroslavl’ 1910. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yarkov V.V., Grazhdanskij process: ucheb. dlya vuzov, 6 ed., Moskva 2006. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhanuzakova L.T., Ponyatie i priznaki administrativno-processual’nyh pravootnoshenij, “Vestnik Instituta Zakonodatel’stva i Pravovoj Informacii RK” 2019. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Akhmetov, Yerik Bulatovich & Abdrasulov, Yermek Bayakhmetovich (2023). What We Talk About When We Talk About the Principle of the Active Role of the Court in Administrative Procedure. (2023). What We Talk About When We Talk About the Principle of the Active Role of the Court in Administrative Procedure. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, 15(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.572 (Original work published 3/2023AD)

MLA style

Akhmetov, Yerik Bulatovich and Abdrasulov, Yermek Bayakhmetovich. “What We Talk About When We Talk About The Principle Of The Active Role Of The Court In Administrative Procedure”. 3/2023AD. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, vol. 15, no. 1, 2023, pp. 81-100.

Chicago style

Akhmetov, Yerik Bulatovich and Abdrasulov, Yermek Bayakhmetovich. “What We Talk About When We Talk About The Principle Of The Active Role Of The Court In Administrative Procedure”. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem, 15, no. 1 (2023): 81-100. doi:10.7206/kp.2080-1084.572.

Copyright info

copyright info

CC-BY

People also read: