en pl
en pl

Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem

Show issue
Year 12/2020 
Volume 12 
Issue 4

Trudne wybory – kto może liczyć na odpowiednią opiekę zdrowotną podczas pandemii COVID-19 w 2020 roku?

Martyna Łaszewska-Hellriegel
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Katedra Prawa Administracyjnego i Finansowego

Christoph Hellriegel
Deutscher Bundestag

12/2020 12 (4) Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem

DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.412

Abstract

The recent pandemic has forced us in 2020 to rethink the priority of access to medical care. The purpose of this article is to offer a brief account of how two countries – Sweden and the US – have reacted to the pandemic. The authors wish to show how the functions of the regulations and guidelines applied by hospitals and institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic differ from the objectives of health policies based on the principles of the distributive justice theory. The article will thus risk a preliminary assessment of the role of law in a crisis. A short summary of the main points of the distributive justice theory will be followed by an analysis of two cases: the guidelines issued by local authorities in Sweden and the American models applied during the COVID-19 pandemic. The conducted analysis results in a thesis that the objective of the justice theory differs from the regulations actually applied. In the case of Sweden, the recommendations seem to clearly prioritise the life of young people over the life of the elderly, even if there is no shortage of resources. In the case of the United States, we can see more objectives of distributive justice implemented in the analysed triages, but they are still not free from discrimination. The authors therefore call for an improvement of mobility of medical care resources in order to mitigate crises. The cognitive value has an international quality, and is aimed at Polish audiences dealing with the problems in question, be it at the level of a hospital or legislation.

References

  1. Andersen L., Hansen E.T., Johannesen N., Sheridan A., Pandemic, Shutdown and Consumer Spending: Lessons from Scandinavian Policy Responses to COVID-19, arXiv:2005.04630v1 (dostęp: 13.08.2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. Beuchamp T.L., Childress J.F., Principles of biomedical ethics, New York 1989. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackorby Ch., Bossert W., Donaldson D., Chapter 11 Utilitarianism and the theory of justice, [w:] K.J. Arrow, A.K. Sen, K. Suzumura (red.), Handbook for Social Choice and Welfare, North Holland 2002, s. 543–596. [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchmann A., Health care delivery and resource allocation, [in:] R.M. Veatch (red.), Medical Ethics, Boston MA 1997, s. 351–380. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook K.S., Hegtvedt K.A., Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality, „Annual Review of Sociology” 1983, 9(1), s. 217–241. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dorn A., van, Cooney R.E., Sabin M.L., COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US, „The Lancet” 2020, 395(10232), s. 1243–1244. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gatter R., Moskop J., From Futility to Triage, „The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine” 1995, 2, s. 191–205. [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris J., QUALYfing the Value of Life, „Journal Medical Ethics” 1987, 13, s. 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirose I., Egalitarianism, Routledge 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. King C., Einhorn L., Brusselares N. i in., Covid-19 a very visible pandemic, „The Lancet”, 2020, 396(10233). [Google Scholar]
  11. Korhonen J., Granberg B., Sweden Backcasting, Now? – Strategic Planning for Covid-19 Mitigation, „A Liberal Democracy, Sustainability” 2020, 12(10). [Google Scholar]
  12. Kwok K.O., Lai F., Wei W.I., Yeung S., Wong S., Letter to the Editor, Herd immunity – estimating the level required to halt the COVID-19 epidemics in affected countries, „Journal of Infection” 2020, 80(6). [Google Scholar]
  13. Mainz J., Health Care and Medical Priorities Commission. No Easy Choices: The Difficult Priorities of Healthcare. Stockholm, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, „Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine” 1995, 23. [Google Scholar]
  14. McHugh N., Baker R.M., Mason H., Williamson L., van Exel J. i in., Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives, „BMC Medical Ethics” 2015, 16, s. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. McKee M., For Debate: Setting priorities: can Britain learn from Sweden?, „BMJ” 1996, 312. [Google Scholar]
  16. Peres Bota D., Melot C., Lopes Ferreira F. i in., The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction, „Intensive Care Med” 2020, 28, s. 1619–1624. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rescher N., The Allocation of exotic Medical Lifesaving Therapy, „Ethics” 1969, 79, s. 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  18. Savage M., Coronavirus: What’s going wrong in Sweden’s care homes?, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52704836, 19.05.2020 (dostęp: 20.07.2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. Vallentyne P., Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, Oxford 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vaughn L., Bioethics, Principles, Issues and Cases, Oxford 2010. [Google Scholar]
  21. White D.B., Lo B., A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic, „JAMA” 2020, 323(18). [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Trudne wybory – kto może liczyć na odpowiednią opiekę zdrowotną podczas pandemii COVID-19 w 2020 roku?. (2020). Trudne wybory – kto może liczyć na odpowiednią opiekę zdrowotną podczas pandemii COVID-19 w 2020 roku?. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, 12(4), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.412 (Original work published 12/2020AD)

MLA style

“Trudne Wybory – Kto Może Liczyć Na Odpowiednią Opiekę Zdrowotną Podczas Pandemii Covid-19 W 2020 Roku?”. 12/2020AD. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, vol. 12, no. 4, 2020, pp. 105-123.

Chicago style

“Trudne Wybory – Kto Może Liczyć Na Odpowiednią Opiekę Zdrowotną Podczas Pandemii Covid-19 W 2020 Roku?”. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 12, no. 4 (2020): 105-123. doi:10.7206/kp.2080-1084.412.