en pl
en pl

Decyzje

Show issue
Year 6/2019 
Issue 31

Strategy and Paradoxes of Borda Count in Formula 1 Racing

Brian Kaiser
University of California

6/2019 (31) Decyzje

DOI 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.124

Abstract

Winning a championship is the highest achievement in Formula 1, and multiple titles can earn one a place in the pantheon of the sport. In this article I explore whether the scoring method for selecting a champion can be considered defi nitive, and how unstable results might be when the method’s parameters are slightly changed. I have employed case studies of paradoxes and historical recreations of seasons using alternative scoring systems. Finally, I argue that the Borda count is desirable system for scoring in Formula 1,
and that building strategies by teams around particular scoring systems is a legitimate aspect of the sport.

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Strategy and Paradoxes of Borda Count in Formula 1 Racing. (2019). Strategy and Paradoxes of Borda Count in Formula 1 Racing. Decyzje, (31), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.124 (Original work published 6/2019AD)

MLA style

“Strategy And Paradoxes Of Borda Count In Formula 1 Racing”. 6/2019AD. Decyzje, no. 31, 2019, pp. 115-132.

Chicago style

“Strategy And Paradoxes Of Borda Count In Formula 1 Racing”. Decyzje, Decyzje, no. 31 (2019): 115-132. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.124.