en pl
en pl

Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem

Show issue
Year 2018 
Volume 10 
Issue 2

The Genesis of the Case Method and its Impact on the American Philosophy of Law

Jacek Srokosz
Uniwersytet Opolski

2018 10 (2) Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem

DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.205

Abstract

The article discusses the Case Method – the dominant method of teaching in American law schools, based on an analysis of judicial decisions, created in the 1870s by Christophus Collumbus Langdell. Langdell perceived law as a science similar to physics or chemistry, and hence as an ordered system of objective knowledge, and the method of teaching that he created was intended to educate people dealing with law in a scientific manner. The article presents Langdell’s concept of law and the impact of his teaching method on the trends in American legal philosophy – classical jurisprudence and legal realism.

References

  1. Areeda P.E., The Socratic Method (SM) (Lecture at Puget Sound 1/31/90), „Harvard Law Review” 1996, 109(5), s. 911–922. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnhizer D., The Purposes and Methods of American Legal Education, „Journal of the Legal Professions” 2011, 36(1), s. 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrington P.D., Butterfly Effects: The Possibilities of Law Teaching in a Democracy, „Duke Law Journal” 1992, 41, s. 774–786. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carrington P.D., Heil Langdell!, „Law and Social Inquiry” 1995, 20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen L.M., The Psychology Behind Case Briefing: A Powerful Cognitive Schema, „Campbell Law Review” 2006, 29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook N., Law as Science: Revisiting Langdell’s Paradigm in the 21th Century, „North Dakota Law Review” 2012, 82(2). [Google Scholar]
  7. Davison D.M., The Jeffersonian vision of Legal Education, „Journal of Legal Education” 2001, 51(2). [Google Scholar]
  8. Duxbury N., Patterns of American Jurisprudence, New York 1995. [Google Scholar]
  9. Edwards H.T., Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Professions, „Michigan Law Review”, 1992, 91(8), s. 34–76. [Google Scholar]
  10. Farnsworth A., Casebooks and Scholarship: Confessions of an American Opinion Clipper, „Southwestern Law Journal” 1988, 42. Fehrenbach H., Poiger U.G., Americanization Reconsidered, [w:] C. Neil, J. Davies, G. McKay (red.), Transactions, Transgressions, Transformations: American Culture in Western Europe and Japan, New York–Oxford 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gantt L.O.N., Deconstructing Thinking Like a Lawyer: Analyzing The Cognitive Components of The Analytical Mind, „Campbell Law Review” 2007, 27. [Google Scholar]
  12. Garner D.D., The Continuing Vitality of the Case Method in the Twenty-First Century, „Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal” 2000, 2. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gerber R.J., Legal Education and Combat Preparedness, „The American Journal of Jurisprudence” 1989, 34(1). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon R.W., Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870–1920, [w:] G.L. Gerson (red.), Professions And Professional Ideologies In America, Chapel Hill 1983. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gray T.C., Langdell’s Orthodoxy, „University of Pittsburg Law Review” 1983, 45. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoeflich M.H., Law & Geometry: Legal Science from Leibniz to Langdell, „The American Journal of Legal History” 1986, 30(2). [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmes W., Book Review, „American Law Review” 1880, 14. [Google Scholar]
  18. Horwitz M.J., The Transformation Of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis Of Legal Orthodoxy, Cambridge–London 1992. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson K., Scales A., An Absolutely, Positively True Story: Seven Reasons Why We Sing, „New Mexico Law Review” 1986, 16. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kagan R.A., Globalization and legal change: The ‘Americanization’ of European law?, „Regulation & Governance” 2007, 1, s. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kennedy D., Toward an Historical Understanding of Legal Consciousness: The Case of Classical Legal Thought in America, 1850–1940, „Research in Law & Sociology” 1980, 3, s. 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimball B.E., The Inception of Modern Legal Education. C.C. Langdell 1826–1906, Chapel Hill 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kissam C., The Ideology of the Case Method/Final Examination Law School, „University of Cincinnati Law Review” 2001, 70. [Google Scholar]
  24. Klafter C.E., The Influence of Vocational Law Schools on the Origins of American Legal Thought 1779–1829, „American Journal of Legal History” 1993, 37. [Google Scholar]
  25. Klein S.R., Legal Education in United States and England: A Comparative Analysis, „Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review” 1991, 13, s. 601–641. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kronman A., The Socratic Method and the Development of the Moral Imagination, „University of Toledo Law Review” 2000, 31. [Google Scholar]
  27. Langdell C.C., Harvard Celebration Speeches, „Law Quarterly Review” 1887, 3. [Google Scholar]
  28. Langdell C.C., Summary of the Law of Contracts, Boston 1880. [Google Scholar]
  29. Leiter B., Legal Realism, [w:] D. Patterson (red.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Oxford 1996. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marshall D.G., Socratic Method and the Irreducible Core of Legal Education, „Minnesota Law Review” 2005, 90, s. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  31. McMains C.R., The History of First Century American Legal Education: A Revisionist Perspective, „Washington University Law Review” 1981, 59(3), s. 597–659. [Google Scholar]
  32. Menkel-Meadow C., Taking Law and ____ Really Seriously: Before, During and after ‘The Law’, „Vanderbilt Law Review” 2007, 60. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mertz E., The Language of Law Schools: Thinking Like a Lawyer, Oxford–New York 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Moline B.J., Early American Legal Education, „Washburn Law Review” 2004, 42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Neal P.C., De Tocqueville and the Role of the Lawyer in Society, „Marquette Law Review” 1967, 50, s. 607–617. [Google Scholar]
  36. Neil C., Davies J., McKay G. (red.), Issues in Americanisation and Culture, Edinburgh 2004. [Google Scholar]
  37. Patterson D., Langdell’s Legacy, „Northwestern University Law Review” 1995, 90. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pollicino O., Against The Idea Of ‘Americanization’ Of European Judicature In The Context Of The New Era Of Judicial Globalization, „Panóptica” 2007, 8, s. 407–440. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pound R., Mechanical Jurisprudence, „Columbia Law Review” 1908, 8. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubin E., What’s Wrong with Langdell’s Method, and What to Do About it, „Vanderbilt Law Review” 2007, 60. [Google Scholar]
  41. Samuelson P.A., The Convergence of the Law School and the University, „The American Scholar”, 1975, 44. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schauer F., Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning, London 2009. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schofield W., Christophus Collumbus Langdell, „The American Law Register” 1907, 55(5). [Google Scholar]
  44. Schultz N.L., How Do Lawyers Really Think?, „Journal of Legal Education” 1992, 42. [Google Scholar]
  45. Siems M.M., World without Law Professors, [w:] Mark van Hocke (red.), Methodologies of Legal Disciplines. What kind of Method? What kind of Discipline?, Oxford–Portland 2011, s. 71–87. [Google Scholar]
  46. Srokosz J., The American discussion on the value of the Langdell’s education method of teaching students to „thinking like a lawyer”, and possibility of its implementation in Polish legal education, [w:] M. Večeřa, T. Machalová, J. Valdhans (red.), Aktuální otázky právní metodologie, Brno 2014, s. 132–146. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stein R.M., The Path of Legal Education from Edward I to Langdell: History of Insular Reaction, „Chicago–Kent Law Review” 1981, 57(2), s. 429–454. [Google Scholar]
  48. Stelmach J., Sarkowicz R., Filozofia prawa XIX i XX wieku, Kraków 1999. [Google Scholar]
  49. Stevens R., Law Schools: Legal Education in America from 1850s to 1980s, Chappel Hill–London 1983. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tocqueville A., De, Democracy in America, Old Maine 2002. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vandevellde K.J., Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Boulder 2011. [Google Scholar]
  52. Veblen T., The Higher Learning in America. A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Man, New York 1918. [Google Scholar]
  53. Veysey L.R., The Emergence of the American University, Chicago 1970. [Google Scholar]
  54. Warren Ch., A History of the American Bar, New York 1921. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wiebe R.H., The Search for Order 1877–1920, New York 1967. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wiegand W., Americanization of Law: Reception or Convergence?, [w:] L.M. Friedman, H.N. Scheiber (red.), Legal Culture and the Legal Profession, Boulder 1996. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zoll F., Jaka szkoła prawa? Czy amerykańskie metody nauczania mogą być przydatne w Polsce?, Warszawa 2004. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

The Genesis of the Case Method and its Impact on the American Philosophy of Law. (2018). The Genesis of the Case Method and its Impact on the American Philosophy of Law. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, 10(2), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.205 (Original work published 2018)

MLA style

“The Genesis Of The Case Method And Its Impact On The American Philosophy Of Law”. 2018. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, vol. 10, no. 2, 2018, pp. 304-319.

Chicago style

“The Genesis Of The Case Method And Its Impact On The American Philosophy Of Law”. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 10, no. 2 (2018): 304-319. doi:10.7206/kp.2080-1084.205.