en pl
en pl


Show issue
Year 12/2014 
Issue 22

How Do Voters Use Preferential Vote in Semi-Open Pr System – The Case Of Poland

Adam Gendźwiłł
Uniwersytet Warszawski

Jacek Raciborski
Uniwersytet Warszawski

12/2014 (22) Decyzje

DOI 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.33


The paper presents some consequences of using semi-open lists, including the preferential vote mechanism, in parliamentary elections in Poland. The Authors discuss whose role in assigning parliamentary seats is greater: that of party organizations’ leaders, who decide on the order of candidates on electoral lists, or that of citizens who cast preferential votes. The paper focuses in the elections in the years 2001–2011, in which, according to poll data, party voting dominated over personal voting. The results of parliamentary elections in Poland show that ballot position effects are persistently present and that people tend to vote for list leaders in their constituencies. However, a simulation of a closed-list mechanism shows that in 2001–2011, ca 20 per cent of parliamentary seats were assigned as a result of the interventionist impact of the preferential vote on the
candidate lists established by parties. The ability to vote for a specifi c candidate is rather important for Poles. The Authors also point out that the candidates from the top of party lists may obtain such good results because voters resort to simple reasoning and vote for those from the top of a list, irrespective of the nature of the list itself. (However, the effect does not seem to be very signifi cant).


  1. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carey, J.M., Shugart, M.S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439. [Google Scholar]
  3. CBOS (2011). Wiedza i opinie Polaków o prawie wyborczym i mechanizmach kampanii. Komunikat CBOS, s. 109. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dalton, R.J., Farrell, D.M., McAllister, I. (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dalton, R.J., Wattenberg, M. (eds.) (2000). Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Darcy, R., McAllister, I. (1990). Ballot position effects. Electoral Studies, 9(1), 5–17. [Google Scholar]
  7. Flis, J. (2014). Złudzenia wyboru. Społeczne wyobrażenia i instytucjonalne ramy w wyborach Sejmu i Senatu. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. [Google Scholar]
  8. Haman, J. (2003). Demokracja – decyzje – wybory. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  9. Marcinkiewicz, K. (2014). Electoral contexts that assist voter coordination: Ballot position effects in Poland. Electoral Studies, 33, 322–334. [Google Scholar]
  10. Markowski, R. (2013). Identyfi kacja partyjna w nowych demokracjach: przypadek Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Studia Polityczne, 32, 45–73. [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller, J.M., Krosnick, J.A. (1998). The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. The Public Opinion Quaterly, 62(3), 291–330. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nohlen, D. (2004). Prawo wyborcze i system partyjny: o teorii systemów wyborczych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  13. Raciborski, F., Rakoczy, K. (2009). Internet, politycy, wybory. O możliwości wykorzystania badań zawartości Internetu do przewidywania wyniku wyborów. W: Zahorska, M., Nasalska, E. (red.), Wartości – polityka – społeczeństwo. Księga dedykowana Profesor Renacie Siemieńskiej-Żochowskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, s. 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  14. Raciborski, J. (1997). Polskie wybory. Zachowania wyborcze społeczeństwa polskiego 1989–1995. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  15. Raciborski, J. (2005). Rywalizacja czy kooperacja? O listach partyjnych w wyborach parlamentarnych. W: Jakubowska U., Skarżyńska K. (red.), Demokracja w Polsce. Doświadczenia zmian. Warszawa: Academica Wydawnictwo SWPS, s. 222–230. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

How Do Voters Use Preferential Vote in Semi-Open Pr System – The Case Of Poland. (2014). How Do Voters Use Preferential Vote in Semi-Open Pr System – The Case Of Poland. Decyzje, (22), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.33 (Original work published 12/2014AD)

MLA style

“How Do Voters Use Preferential Vote In Semi-Open Pr System – The Case Of Poland”. 12/2014AD. Decyzje, no. 22, 2014, pp. 47-69.

Chicago style

“How Do Voters Use Preferential Vote In Semi-Open Pr System – The Case Of Poland”. Decyzje, Decyzje, no. 22 (2014): 47-69. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.33.