en pl
en pl

Decyzje

Show issue
Year 06/2016 
Issue 25

The Effect Of Ordering Products By Price And Payment Method On Consumer Choice

Anna Hełka
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny

Ewelina Ślimak
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny

06/2016 (25) Decyzje

DOI 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.70

Abstract

The presented research shows that consumer choice of product depends on the sequence in which products are presented. When they were presented according to decreasing prices the customer chose more expensive products than in the case of increasing prices. However this happens only in case of paying cash not voucher. In order to rule out the alternative reasons of this effect another study was conducted. Participants of the second study were randomly acquainted with 10 product brands. Then they chose one of ten products which were sorted according to their prices: decreasing or increasing.
Again, when paying cash, participants chose more expensive products when they were sorted according to decreasing prices. The results of second research suggest that the presented differences in choosing products cannot be explained by anchoring heuristic, the effect of priority, or incomplete information processing.

References

  1. Ariely, D. (2009). Potęga irracjonalności. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Dolnośląskie, 19-35. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (1997). Psychologia społeczna: serce i umysł. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, 153-154. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyle, P.J., & Lathrop, E.S. (2009). Are consumers’ perceptions of price–quality relationships well calibrated?. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(1), 58-63. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of consumer research, 27(3), 360-370. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chandran, S., & Morwitz, V.H. (2006). The Price of ‘free’-dom: Consumer sensitivity to promotions with negative contextual infl uences. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(12), 384-392. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cole, C. (1998). Identifying interventions to reduce credit card misuse through consumer behavior research. W: Proceedings of the Marketing and Public Policy Conference, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Diamond, W.D., & Sanyal, A. (1990). The effect of framing on the choice of supermarket coupons. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 488-493. [Google Scholar]
  8. Falkowski, A., Tyszka, T. (2001). Psychologia zachowań konsumenckich, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk. [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinberg, R.A. (1986). Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 348-356. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabor, A., & Granger, C.W.J. (1966). Price as an indicator of quality: Report on an inquiry. Economica, 46(2), 43-70. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner, D.M. (1971). Is there a generalized price-quality relationship?” Journal of Marketing Research, 8(5), 241-243. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerstner, E. (1985). Do higher prices signal higher quality? Journal of Marketing Research, 22(5), 209-215. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P.M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, USA. [Google Scholar]
  14. Helion, C., & Gilovich, T. (2014). Gift Cards and Mental Accounting: Green-lighting Hedonic Spending. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(4), 386-393. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirschman, E.C. (1979). Differences in consumer purchase behavior by credit card payment system. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 58-66. [Google Scholar]
  16. Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 31-44. [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, E. J., Häubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: a query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 461-474. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-293. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kardes, F.R., Cronley, M.L., Kellaris, J.J., & Posavac, S.S. (2004). The role of selective information processing in price-quality inference. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 368-374. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kardes, F.R., Posavac, S.S., & Cronley, M.L. (2004). Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 230-256. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kirchler, E. (2003). Wirtschaftspsychologie (Economic Psychology, 3rd edition). Göttingen: Hogrefe. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirchler, E., Fischer, F., & Hölzl, E. (2010). Price and its relation to objective and subjective product quality: evidence from the Austrian market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 33(3), 275-286. [Google Scholar]
  24. Leavitt, H.J. (1954). A note on some experimental fi ndings about the meaning of price. Journal of Business, 27(7), 205-210. [Google Scholar]
  25. McConnell, J.D. (1968). Effects of pricing on perceptions of product quality. Journal of Marketing research, 5(8), 300-303. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2011). The infl uence of price discount versus bonus pack on the preference for virtue and vice foods. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 196-206. [Google Scholar]
  27. Monroe, K.B. (1973). Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of marketing research, 70-80. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pieters, R. & Warlop, L. (1999). Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  29. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4-28. [Google Scholar]
  30. Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 5-12. [Google Scholar]
  31. Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2008). Monopoly money: the effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(3), 213-225. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rao, A.R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(9), 253-264. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rao, A.R., & Monroe, K.B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(9), 351-357. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rao, A.R., & Sieben, W.A. (1992). The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(9), 256-270. [Google Scholar]
  35. Scitovszky, T. (1944). Some consequences of the habit of judging quality by price. The Review of Economic Studies, 12(32), 100-105. [Google Scholar]
  36. Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138. [Google Scholar]
  37. Simon, H.A. (1965). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  38. Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 460-474. [Google Scholar]
  39. Soman, D. (2003). The effect of payment transparency on consumption: Quasi-experiments from the fi eld. Marketing Letters, 14, 173-183. [Google Scholar]
  40. Suk, K., Lee, J., & Lichtenstein, D.R. (2012). The infl uence of price presentation order on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 708-717. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tellis, G.J., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information. Marketing Science, 6(3), 240-253. [Google Scholar]
  42. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4(3), 199-214. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thaler, R.H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tokunaga, H. (1993). The use and abuse of consumer credit: Applications of psychological theory and research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(2), 285-316. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tversky A., & Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The quarterly journal of economics, 1039-1061. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tyszka, T. (2010). Decyzje: perspektywa psychologiczna i ekonomiczna. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  48. Verma, D.P.S., & Gupta, S.S. (2004). Does higher price signal better quality?. Vikalpa, 29(2), 67. [Google Scholar]
  49. Völckner, F., & Hofmann, J. (2007). The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants. Marketing Letters, 18(3), 181-196. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wojciszke, B. (2002). Człowiek wśród ludzi: zarys psychologii społecznej. Warszawa. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 82-83. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yan, D. & Sengupta, J. (2011). Effects of construal level on the price-quality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 376-389. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zaleśkiewicz, T., & Hełka, A. (2007). Trening współpracy/rywalizacji jako forma wpływu na zachowanie ludzi w dwuosobowej grze zaufania. Decyzje, 7, 83-103. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zaleskiewicz, T., & Hełka, A. (2011). Gender differences in allocation choices made by children aged 5 to 6. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 42(2), 46-51. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

The Effect Of Ordering Products By Price And Payment Method On Consumer Choice. (2016). The Effect Of Ordering Products By Price And Payment Method On Consumer Choice. Decyzje, (25), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.70 (Original work published 06/2016AD)

MLA style

“The Effect Of Ordering Products By Price And Payment Method On Consumer Choice”. 06/2016AD. Decyzje, no. 25, 2016, pp. 43-65.

Chicago style

“The Effect Of Ordering Products By Price And Payment Method On Consumer Choice”. Decyzje, Decyzje, no. 25 (2016): 43-65. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.70.