en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Show issue
Year 2019 
Volume 27 
Issue 2

Managerial Discretion and Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model

Eugeniusz Kąciak
Goodman School of Business; Brock University

Andrzej K. Koźmiński
Kozminski University

2019 27 (2) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.250

Article contents

Abstract

Purpose: We propose and test a new leadership model. Our model is an extension of the leaderplex model which proposes that leader cognitive and social complexities are linked with leader effec tiveness indirectly, in a mediation scheme, through behavioral complexity. We enhance the leader plex model with a leader’s degree of managerial discretion as the moderator of the links in this mediation format.

Methodology: We test our model with a moderated mediation approach (Baron-Kenny four-step procedure and Preacher-Hayes bootstrapping methods).

Findings: We use results of interviews with top leaders in Poland and demonstrate that a leader’s managerial discretion is a moderator affecting the mediation scheme assumed in the leaderplex model.

Limitations: The sample size is only 29 leaders. To preserve the respondents’ anonymity, their opinions were evaluated by only one researcher who interviewed them directly. The results may be country specific (Poland).

Originality: We define new boundary conditions for the leaderplex model by showing importance of a leader’s real position (managerial discretion) in an organization. Specifically, we show that the nature of the relationships between the variables of interest will change when a leader operates in one physical environment (e.g., high managerial discretion) rather than another (e.g., low managerial discretion).

References

  1. Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C. and Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader polit ical skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G. and Reno, R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interac tions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  4. Alban-Metcalfe, J. and Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). Reliability and validity of the “leadership compe tencies and engaging leadership scale”. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 56–73, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ammeter, A.P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W.L., Hochwarter, W.A. and Ferris, G.R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 751–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00157-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker III, V. L., Patterson Jr, P. W. and Mueller, G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 235–269, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00235 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form, Rater, and Scoring Key for MLQ. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar]
  11. Belasen, A. and Frank, N. (2008). Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852489 [Google Scholar]
  12. Boal, K.B. and Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruch, H. and Walter, F. (2007). Leadership in context: Investigating hierarchical impacts on trans formational leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 710–726, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710835452 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carmeli, A. and Halevi, M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavi oral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambi dexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark, J.R., Murphy, C. and Singer, S.J. (2014). When do leaders matter? Ownership, governance and the influence of CEOs on firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 358–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crant, M.J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 [Google Scholar]
  17. Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dionne, S.D. et al. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Espedal, B. (2009). Maneuvering space for leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2), 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334190 [Google Scholar]
  20. Federici, R.A. (2013). Principals’ self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy, job satisfaction, and contextual constraints. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0102-5 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fischer, T., Dietz, J. and Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hambrick, D.C. and Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In: L. Cummings and M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 9: 369–406. Greenwich. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hart, S.L. and Quinn, R.E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600501 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hayes, A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayes, A.F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, infer ence, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hayes, A.F. and Rockwood, N.J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heyler, S.G., Armenakis, A.A., Walker, A.G. and Collier, D.Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigat ing the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 788–801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoogh de, A.H. et al. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447–471, https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000164 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917–946, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900703 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J.G. and Dodge, G.E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: R.L. Phillips and J.G. Hunt (eds.), Strategic management: A multiorganization al- level perspective. New York: Quorum. [Google Scholar]
  33. Howell, J.P., Dorfman, P.W. and Kerr, S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 88–102, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282632 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacques, E. (1986). The Development of Intellectual Capability: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(4), 361–383, https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200402 [Google Scholar]
  35. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Manage ment Review, 31(2), 386–408, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jung, D. I., Chow C. and Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing orga nizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X [Google Scholar]
  37. Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: Harper-Collins. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kozminski, A.K. (2015). Bounded Leadership: Empirical Study of Polish Elite. Polish Sociological Review, 4(192), 425–453. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kyndt, E. and Baert, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lawrence, K.A., Lenk, P. and Quinn, R.E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psycho metric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quar terly, 20(2), 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  41. Leavitt, H.J. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  42. Litano, M.L., Major, D.A., Landers, R.N., Streets, V.N. and Bass, B.I. (2016). A meta-analytic investi gation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 802–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lussier, D.N. (2010). From solidarity to division: An analysis of Lech Wałęsa’s transition to consti tuted leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 703–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  44. Miller, D. (2002). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359–368, https://doi.org/10.1080/714042515 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  46. Neubert, M.J., Hunter, E.M. and Tolentino, R.C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ng, K. Y., Ang, S. and Chan, K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated medi ation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733 [Google Scholar]
  48. Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  49. Osborn, R.N., Hunt, J.G. and Jauch, L.R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6 [Google Scholar]
  50. Parker, S.K. and Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proac tive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pereira, C.M. and Gomes, J.F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4301–4318, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434 [Google Scholar]
  52. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar]
  53. Porter, L.W. and McLaughlin, G.B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pounder, J.S. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: managerial implications of a Hong Kong study. Educational Management and Administration, 27(4), 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X990274006 [Google Scholar]
  55. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 [Google Scholar]
  56. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and com paring indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  57. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316 [Google Scholar]
  58. Quinn, R.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward an Integrative Model. In: J.G. Hunt, R. Stewart, C. Schriesheim and D. Hosking (eds.), Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. New York: Pergamon, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3 [Google Scholar]
  59. Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. [Google Scholar]
  60. Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a compet ing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29(3), 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 [Google Scholar]
  61. Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1977). Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influenc of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 475–498, https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747701200405 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102–128, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312 [Google Scholar]
  63. Simon, H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice, in: Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  64. Spangenberg, H.H. and Theron, C.C. (2001). Manual for the Leadership Behaviour Inventory: Guide lines for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch [Google Scholar]
  65. Stentz, J.E., Clark, V.L. and Matkin, G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1173–1183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  66. Strang, S.E. and Kuhnert, K.W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 421–433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sturm, R.E., Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375 [Google Scholar]
  69. Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncer tainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134–143, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang, P. and Rode, J.C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709354132 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wangrow, D.B., Schepker, D.J. and Barker III, V.L. (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214 [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang, L.R., Yen, H.F. and Chiang, Y.F. (2012). A framework for assessing impacts of leadership competency on police project performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction and moderating role of project type. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 35(3), 528–550, https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211250785 [Google Scholar]
  73. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207 [Google Scholar]
  74. Zaccaro, S.J., Green, J.P., Dubrow, S. and Kolze, M.J. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  75. Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C. and Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader polit ical skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  76. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G. and Reno, R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interac tions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  77. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  78. Alban-Metcalfe, J. and Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). Reliability and validity of the “leadership compe tencies and engaging leadership scale”. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 56–73, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281 [Google Scholar]
  79. Ammeter, A.P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W.L., Hochwarter, W.A. and Ferris, G.R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 751–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00157-1 [Google Scholar]
  80. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  81. Barker III, V. L., Patterson Jr, P. W. and Mueller, G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 235–269, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00235 [Google Scholar]
  82. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar]
  83. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [Google Scholar]
  84. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form, Rater, and Scoring Key for MLQ. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar]
  85. Belasen, A. and Frank, N. (2008). Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852489 [Google Scholar]
  86. Boal, K.B. and Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 [Google Scholar]
  87. Bruch, H. and Walter, F. (2007). Leadership in context: Investigating hierarchical impacts on trans formational leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 710–726, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710835452 [Google Scholar]
  88. Carmeli, A. and Halevi, M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavi oral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambi dexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  89. Clark, J.R., Murphy, C. and Singer, S.J. (2014). When do leaders matter? Ownership, governance and the influence of CEOs on firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 358–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  90. Crant, M.J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 [Google Scholar]
  91. Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524 [Google Scholar]
  92. Dionne, S.D. et al. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  93. Espedal, B. (2009). Maneuvering space for leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2), 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334190 [Google Scholar]
  94. Federici, R.A. (2013). Principals’ self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy, job satisfaction, and contextual constraints. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0102-5 [Google Scholar]
  95. Fischer, T., Dietz, J. and Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830 [Google Scholar]
  96. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  97. Hambrick, D.C. and Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In: L. Cummings and M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 9: 369–406. Greenwich. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hart, S.L. and Quinn, R.E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600501 [Google Scholar]
  99. Hayes, A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 [Google Scholar]
  100. Hayes, A.F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, infer ence, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 [Google Scholar]
  101. Hayes, A.F. and Rockwood, N.J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  102. Heyler, S.G., Armenakis, A.A., Walker, A.G. and Collier, D.Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigat ing the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 788–801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  103. Hoogh de, A.H. et al. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447–471, https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000164 [Google Scholar]
  104. Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917–946, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900703 [Google Scholar]
  105. Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J.G. and Dodge, G.E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: R.L. Phillips and J.G. Hunt (eds.), Strategic management: A multiorganization al- level perspective. New York: Quorum. [Google Scholar]
  107. Howell, J.P., Dorfman, P.W. and Kerr, S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 88–102, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282632 [Google Scholar]
  108. Jacques, E. (1986). The Development of Intellectual Capability: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(4), 361–383, https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200402 [Google Scholar]
  109. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Manage ment Review, 31(2), 386–408, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687 [Google Scholar]
  110. Jung, D. I., Chow C. and Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing orga nizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X [Google Scholar]
  111. Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: Harper-Collins. [Google Scholar]
  112. Kozminski, A.K. (2015). Bounded Leadership: Empirical Study of Polish Elite. Polish Sociological Review, 4(192), 425–453. [Google Scholar]
  113. Kyndt, E. and Baert, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  114. Lawrence, K.A., Lenk, P. and Quinn, R.E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psycho metric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quar terly, 20(2), 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  115. Leavitt, H.J. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  116. Litano, M.L., Major, D.A., Landers, R.N., Streets, V.N. and Bass, B.I. (2016). A meta-analytic investi gation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 802–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  117. Lussier, D.N. (2010). From solidarity to division: An analysis of Lech Wałęsa’s transition to consti tuted leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 703–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  118. Miller, D. (2002). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359–368, https://doi.org/10.1080/714042515 [Google Scholar]
  119. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  120. Neubert, M.J., Hunter, E.M. and Tolentino, R.C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  121. Ng, K. Y., Ang, S. and Chan, K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated medi ation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733 [Google Scholar]
  122. Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  123. Osborn, R.N., Hunt, J.G. and Jauch, L.R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6 [Google Scholar]
  124. Parker, S.K. and Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proac tive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554 [Google Scholar]
  125. Pereira, C.M. and Gomes, J.F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4301–4318, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434 [Google Scholar]
  126. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar]
  127. Porter, L.W. and McLaughlin, G.B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  128. Pounder, J.S. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: managerial implications of a Hong Kong study. Educational Management and Administration, 27(4), 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X990274006 [Google Scholar]
  129. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 [Google Scholar]
  130. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and com paring indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  131. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316 [Google Scholar]
  132. Quinn, R.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward an Integrative Model. In: J.G. Hunt, R. Stewart, C. Schriesheim and D. Hosking (eds.), Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. New York: Pergamon, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3 [Google Scholar]
  133. Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. [Google Scholar]
  134. Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a compet ing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29(3), 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 [Google Scholar]
  135. Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1977). Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influenc of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 475–498, https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747701200405 [Google Scholar]
  136. Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102–128, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312 [Google Scholar]
  137. Simon, H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice, in: Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  138. Spangenberg, H.H. and Theron, C.C. (2001). Manual for the Leadership Behaviour Inventory: Guide lines for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch [Google Scholar]
  139. Stentz, J.E., Clark, V.L. and Matkin, G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1173–1183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  140. Strang, S.E. and Kuhnert, K.W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 421–433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  141. Sturm, R.E., Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  142. Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375 [Google Scholar]
  143. Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncer tainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134–143, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341 [Google Scholar]
  144. Wang, P. and Rode, J.C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709354132 [Google Scholar]
  145. Wangrow, D.B., Schepker, D.J. and Barker III, V.L. (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214 [Google Scholar]
  146. Yang, L.R., Yen, H.F. and Chiang, Y.F. (2012). A framework for assessing impacts of leadership competency on police project performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction and moderating role of project type. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 35(3), 528–550, https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211250785 [Google Scholar]
  147. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207 [Google Scholar]
  148. Zaccaro, S.J., Green, J.P., Dubrow, S. and Kolze, M.J. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  149. Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C. and Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader polit ical skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  150. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G. and Reno, R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interac tions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  151. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  152. Alban-Metcalfe, J. and Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). Reliability and validity of the “leadership compe tencies and engaging leadership scale”. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 56–73, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281 [Google Scholar]
  153. Ammeter, A.P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W.L., Hochwarter, W.A. and Ferris, G.R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 751–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00157-1 [Google Scholar]
  154. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  155. Barker III, V. L., Patterson Jr, P. W. and Mueller, G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 235–269, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00235 [Google Scholar]
  156. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar]
  157. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [Google Scholar]
  158. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form, Rater, and Scoring Key for MLQ. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar]
  159. Belasen, A. and Frank, N. (2008). Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852489 [Google Scholar]
  160. Boal, K.B. and Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 [Google Scholar]
  161. Bruch, H. and Walter, F. (2007). Leadership in context: Investigating hierarchical impacts on trans formational leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 710–726, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710835452 [Google Scholar]
  162. Carmeli, A. and Halevi, M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavi oral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambi dexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  163. Clark, J.R., Murphy, C. and Singer, S.J. (2014). When do leaders matter? Ownership, governance and the influence of CEOs on firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 358–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  164. Crant, M.J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 [Google Scholar]
  165. Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524 [Google Scholar]
  166. Dionne, S.D. et al. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  167. Espedal, B. (2009). Maneuvering space for leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2), 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334190 [Google Scholar]
  168. Federici, R.A. (2013). Principals’ self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy, job satisfaction, and contextual constraints. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0102-5 [Google Scholar]
  169. Fischer, T., Dietz, J. and Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830 [Google Scholar]
  170. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  171. Hambrick, D.C. and Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In: L. Cummings and M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 9: 369–406. Greenwich. [Google Scholar]
  172. Hart, S.L. and Quinn, R.E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600501 [Google Scholar]
  173. Hayes, A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 [Google Scholar]
  174. Hayes, A.F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, infer ence, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 [Google Scholar]
  175. Hayes, A.F. and Rockwood, N.J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  176. Heyler, S.G., Armenakis, A.A., Walker, A.G. and Collier, D.Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigat ing the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 788–801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  177. Hoogh de, A.H. et al. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447–471, https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000164 [Google Scholar]
  178. Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917–946, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900703 [Google Scholar]
  179. Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J.G. and Dodge, G.E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305 [Google Scholar]
  180. Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: R.L. Phillips and J.G. Hunt (eds.), Strategic management: A multiorganization al- level perspective. New York: Quorum. [Google Scholar]
  181. Howell, J.P., Dorfman, P.W. and Kerr, S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 88–102, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282632 [Google Scholar]
  182. Jacques, E. (1986). The Development of Intellectual Capability: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(4), 361–383, https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200402 [Google Scholar]
  183. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Manage ment Review, 31(2), 386–408, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687 [Google Scholar]
  184. Jung, D. I., Chow C. and Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing orga nizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X [Google Scholar]
  185. Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: Harper-Collins. [Google Scholar]
  186. Kozminski, A.K. (2015). Bounded Leadership: Empirical Study of Polish Elite. Polish Sociological Review, 4(192), 425–453. [Google Scholar]
  187. Kyndt, E. and Baert, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  188. Lawrence, K.A., Lenk, P. and Quinn, R.E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psycho metric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quar terly, 20(2), 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  189. Leavitt, H.J. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  190. Litano, M.L., Major, D.A., Landers, R.N., Streets, V.N. and Bass, B.I. (2016). A meta-analytic investi gation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 802–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  191. Lussier, D.N. (2010). From solidarity to division: An analysis of Lech Wałęsa’s transition to consti tuted leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 703–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  192. Miller, D. (2002). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359–368, https://doi.org/10.1080/714042515 [Google Scholar]
  193. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  194. Neubert, M.J., Hunter, E.M. and Tolentino, R.C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  195. Ng, K. Y., Ang, S. and Chan, K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated medi ation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733 [Google Scholar]
  196. Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  197. Osborn, R.N., Hunt, J.G. and Jauch, L.R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6 [Google Scholar]
  198. Parker, S.K. and Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proac tive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554 [Google Scholar]
  199. Pereira, C.M. and Gomes, J.F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4301–4318, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434 [Google Scholar]
  200. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar]
  201. Porter, L.W. and McLaughlin, G.B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  202. Pounder, J.S. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: managerial implications of a Hong Kong study. Educational Management and Administration, 27(4), 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X990274006 [Google Scholar]
  203. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 [Google Scholar]
  204. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and com paring indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  205. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316 [Google Scholar]
  206. Quinn, R.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward an Integrative Model. In: J.G. Hunt, R. Stewart, C. Schriesheim and D. Hosking (eds.), Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. New York: Pergamon, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3 [Google Scholar]
  207. Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. [Google Scholar]
  208. Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a compet ing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29(3), 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 [Google Scholar]
  209. Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1977). Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influenc of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 475–498, https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747701200405 [Google Scholar]
  210. Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102–128, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312 [Google Scholar]
  211. Simon, H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice, in: Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  212. Spangenberg, H.H. and Theron, C.C. (2001). Manual for the Leadership Behaviour Inventory: Guide lines for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch [Google Scholar]
  213. Stentz, J.E., Clark, V.L. and Matkin, G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1173–1183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  214. Strang, S.E. and Kuhnert, K.W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 421–433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  215. Sturm, R.E., Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  216. Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375 [Google Scholar]
  217. Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncer tainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134–143, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341 [Google Scholar]
  218. Wang, P. and Rode, J.C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709354132 [Google Scholar]
  219. Wangrow, D.B., Schepker, D.J. and Barker III, V.L. (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214 [Google Scholar]
  220. Yang, L.R., Yen, H.F. and Chiang, Y.F. (2012). A framework for assessing impacts of leadership competency on police project performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction and moderating role of project type. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 35(3), 528–550, https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211250785 [Google Scholar]
  221. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207 [Google Scholar]
  222. Zaccaro, S.J., Green, J.P., Dubrow, S. and Kolze, M.J. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  223. Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C. and Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader polit ical skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  224. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G. and Reno, R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interac tions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  225. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  226. Alban-Metcalfe, J. and Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). Reliability and validity of the “leadership compe tencies and engaging leadership scale”. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 56–73, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281 [Google Scholar]
  227. Ammeter, A.P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W.L., Hochwarter, W.A. and Ferris, G.R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 751–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00157-1 [Google Scholar]
  228. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  229. Barker III, V. L., Patterson Jr, P. W. and Mueller, G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 235–269, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00235 [Google Scholar]
  230. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar]
  231. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [Google Scholar]
  232. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form, Rater, and Scoring Key for MLQ. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar]
  233. Belasen, A. and Frank, N. (2008). Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852489 [Google Scholar]
  234. Boal, K.B. and Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 [Google Scholar]
  235. Bruch, H. and Walter, F. (2007). Leadership in context: Investigating hierarchical impacts on trans formational leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 710–726, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710835452 [Google Scholar]
  236. Carmeli, A. and Halevi, M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavi oral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambi dexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  237. Clark, J.R., Murphy, C. and Singer, S.J. (2014). When do leaders matter? Ownership, governance and the influence of CEOs on firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 358–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  238. Crant, M.J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 [Google Scholar]
  239. Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524 [Google Scholar]
  240. Dionne, S.D. et al. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  241. Espedal, B. (2009). Maneuvering space for leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2), 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334190 [Google Scholar]
  242. Federici, R.A. (2013). Principals’ self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy, job satisfaction, and contextual constraints. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0102-5 [Google Scholar]
  243. Fischer, T., Dietz, J. and Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830 [Google Scholar]
  244. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  245. Hambrick, D.C. and Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In: L. Cummings and M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 9: 369–406. Greenwich. [Google Scholar]
  246. Hart, S.L. and Quinn, R.E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600501 [Google Scholar]
  247. Hayes, A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 [Google Scholar]
  248. Hayes, A.F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, infer ence, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 [Google Scholar]
  249. Hayes, A.F. and Rockwood, N.J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  250. Heyler, S.G., Armenakis, A.A., Walker, A.G. and Collier, D.Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigat ing the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 788–801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  251. Hoogh de, A.H. et al. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447–471, https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000164 [Google Scholar]
  252. Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917–946, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900703 [Google Scholar]
  253. Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J.G. and Dodge, G.E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305 [Google Scholar]
  254. Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: R.L. Phillips and J.G. Hunt (eds.), Strategic management: A multiorganization al- level perspective. New York: Quorum. [Google Scholar]
  255. Howell, J.P., Dorfman, P.W. and Kerr, S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 88–102, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282632 [Google Scholar]
  256. Jacques, E. (1986). The Development of Intellectual Capability: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(4), 361–383, https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200402 [Google Scholar]
  257. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Manage ment Review, 31(2), 386–408, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687 [Google Scholar]
  258. Jung, D. I., Chow C. and Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing orga nizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X [Google Scholar]
  259. Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: Harper-Collins. [Google Scholar]
  260. Kozminski, A.K. (2015). Bounded Leadership: Empirical Study of Polish Elite. Polish Sociological Review, 4(192), 425–453. [Google Scholar]
  261. Kyndt, E. and Baert, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  262. Lawrence, K.A., Lenk, P. and Quinn, R.E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psycho metric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quar terly, 20(2), 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  263. Leavitt, H.J. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  264. Litano, M.L., Major, D.A., Landers, R.N., Streets, V.N. and Bass, B.I. (2016). A meta-analytic investi gation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 802–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  265. Lussier, D.N. (2010). From solidarity to division: An analysis of Lech Wałęsa’s transition to consti tuted leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 703–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  266. Miller, D. (2002). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359–368, https://doi.org/10.1080/714042515 [Google Scholar]
  267. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  268. Neubert, M.J., Hunter, E.M. and Tolentino, R.C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  269. Ng, K. Y., Ang, S. and Chan, K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated medi ation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733 [Google Scholar]
  270. Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  271. Osborn, R.N., Hunt, J.G. and Jauch, L.R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6 [Google Scholar]
  272. Parker, S.K. and Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proac tive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554 [Google Scholar]
  273. Pereira, C.M. and Gomes, J.F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4301–4318, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434 [Google Scholar]
  274. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar]
  275. Porter, L.W. and McLaughlin, G.B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  276. Pounder, J.S. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: managerial implications of a Hong Kong study. Educational Management and Administration, 27(4), 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X990274006 [Google Scholar]
  277. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 [Google Scholar]
  278. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and com paring indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  279. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316 [Google Scholar]
  280. Quinn, R.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward an Integrative Model. In: J.G. Hunt, R. Stewart, C. Schriesheim and D. Hosking (eds.), Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. New York: Pergamon, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3 [Google Scholar]
  281. Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. [Google Scholar]
  282. Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a compet ing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29(3), 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 [Google Scholar]
  283. Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1977). Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influenc of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 475–498, https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747701200405 [Google Scholar]
  284. Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102–128, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312 [Google Scholar]
  285. Simon, H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice, in: Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  286. Spangenberg, H.H. and Theron, C.C. (2001). Manual for the Leadership Behaviour Inventory: Guide lines for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch [Google Scholar]
  287. Stentz, J.E., Clark, V.L. and Matkin, G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1173–1183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  288. Strang, S.E. and Kuhnert, K.W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 421–433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  289. Sturm, R.E., Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  290. Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375 [Google Scholar]
  291. Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncer tainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134–143, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341 [Google Scholar]
  292. Wang, P. and Rode, J.C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709354132 [Google Scholar]
  293. Wangrow, D.B., Schepker, D.J. and Barker III, V.L. (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214 [Google Scholar]
  294. Yang, L.R., Yen, H.F. and Chiang, Y.F. (2012). A framework for assessing impacts of leadership competency on police project performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction and moderating role of project type. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 35(3), 528–550, https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211250785 [Google Scholar]
  295. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207 [Google Scholar]
  296. Zaccaro, S.J., Green, J.P., Dubrow, S. and Kolze, M.J. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  297. Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Douglas, C. and Ammeter, A.P. (2004). Leader polit ical skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  298. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G. and Reno, R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interac tions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  299. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  300. Alban-Metcalfe, J. and Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). Reliability and validity of the “leadership compe tencies and engaging leadership scale”. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 56–73, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281 [Google Scholar]
  301. Ammeter, A.P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W.L., Hochwarter, W.A. and Ferris, G.R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 751–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00157-1 [Google Scholar]
  302. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  303. Barker III, V. L., Patterson Jr, P. W. and Mueller, G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 235–269, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00235 [Google Scholar]
  304. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar]
  305. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic, al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [Google Scholar]
  306. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form, Rater, and Scoring Key for MLQ. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar]
  307. Belasen, A. and Frank, N. (2008). Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852489 [Google Scholar]
  308. Boal, K.B. and Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 [Google Scholar]
  309. Bruch, H. and Walter, F. (2007). Leadership in context: Investigating hierarchical impacts on trans formational leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 710–726, https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710835452 [Google Scholar]
  310. Carmeli, A. and Halevi, M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavi oral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambi dexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  311. Clark, J.R., Murphy, C. and Singer, S.J. (2014). When do leaders matter? Ownership, governance and the influence of CEOs on firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 358–372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  312. Crant, M.J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 [Google Scholar]
  313. Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524 [Google Scholar]
  314. Dionne, S.D. et al. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  315. Espedal, B. (2009). Maneuvering space for leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2), 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334190 [Google Scholar]
  316. Federici, R.A. (2013). Principals’ self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy, job satisfaction, and contextual constraints. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0102-5 [Google Scholar]
  317. Fischer, T., Dietz, J. and Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830 [Google Scholar]
  318. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  319. Hambrick, D.C. and Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In: L. Cummings and M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 9: 369–406. Greenwich. [Google Scholar]
  320. Hart, S.L. and Quinn, R.E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600501 [Google Scholar]
  321. Hayes, A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 [Google Scholar]
  322. Hayes, A.F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, infer ence, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 [Google Scholar]
  323. Hayes, A.F. and Rockwood, N.J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  324. Heyler, S.G., Armenakis, A.A., Walker, A.G. and Collier, D.Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigat ing the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 788–801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  325. Hoogh de, A.H. et al. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447–471, https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000164 [Google Scholar]
  326. Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917–946, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900703 [Google Scholar]
  327. Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J.G. and Dodge, G.E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305 [Google Scholar]
  328. Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: R.L. Phillips and J.G. Hunt (eds.), Strategic management: A multiorganization al- level perspective. New York: Quorum. [Google Scholar]
  329. Howell, J.P., Dorfman, P.W. and Kerr, S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 88–102, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282632 [Google Scholar]
  330. Jacques, E. (1986). The Development of Intellectual Capability: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(4), 361–383, https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200402 [Google Scholar]
  331. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Manage ment Review, 31(2), 386–408, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687 [Google Scholar]
  332. Jung, D. I., Chow C. and Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing orga nizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X [Google Scholar]
  333. Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: Harper-Collins. [Google Scholar]
  334. Kozminski, A.K. (2015). Bounded Leadership: Empirical Study of Polish Elite. Polish Sociological Review, 4(192), 425–453. [Google Scholar]
  335. Kyndt, E. and Baert, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  336. Lawrence, K.A., Lenk, P. and Quinn, R.E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psycho metric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quar terly, 20(2), 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  337. Leavitt, H.J. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  338. Litano, M.L., Major, D.A., Landers, R.N., Streets, V.N. and Bass, B.I. (2016). A meta-analytic investi gation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 802–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  339. Lussier, D.N. (2010). From solidarity to division: An analysis of Lech Wałęsa’s transition to consti tuted leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 703–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  340. Miller, D. (2002). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359–368, https://doi.org/10.1080/714042515 [Google Scholar]
  341. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  342. Neubert, M.J., Hunter, E.M. and Tolentino, R.C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  343. Ng, K. Y., Ang, S. and Chan, K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated medi ation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733 [Google Scholar]
  344. Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  345. Osborn, R.N., Hunt, J.G. and Jauch, L.R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6 [Google Scholar]
  346. Parker, S.K. and Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proac tive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554 [Google Scholar]
  347. Pereira, C.M. and Gomes, J.F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4301–4318, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434 [Google Scholar]
  348. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar]
  349. Porter, L.W. and McLaughlin, G.B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  350. Pounder, J.S. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: managerial implications of a Hong Kong study. Educational Management and Administration, 27(4), 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X990274006 [Google Scholar]
  351. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 [Google Scholar]
  352. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and com paring indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  353. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316 [Google Scholar]
  354. Quinn, R.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward an Integrative Model. In: J.G. Hunt, R. Stewart, C. Schriesheim and D. Hosking (eds.), Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. New York: Pergamon, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3 [Google Scholar]
  355. Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. [Google Scholar]
  356. Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a compet ing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29(3), 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 [Google Scholar]
  357. Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1977). Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influenc of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 475–498, https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747701200405 [Google Scholar]
  358. Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102–128, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312 [Google Scholar]
  359. Simon, H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice, in: Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  360. Spangenberg, H.H. and Theron, C.C. (2001). Manual for the Leadership Behaviour Inventory: Guide lines for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch [Google Scholar]
  361. Stentz, J.E., Clark, V.L. and Matkin, G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1173–1183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  362. Strang, S.E. and Kuhnert, K.W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 421–433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  363. Sturm, R.E., Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  364. Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375 [Google Scholar]
  365. Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncer tainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134–143, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341 [Google Scholar]
  366. Wang, P. and Rode, J.C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709354132 [Google Scholar]
  367. Wangrow, D.B., Schepker, D.J. and Barker III, V.L. (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214 [Google Scholar]
  368. Yang, L.R., Yen, H.F. and Chiang, Y.F. (2012). A framework for assessing impacts of leadership competency on police project performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction and moderating role of project type. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 35(3), 528–550, https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211250785 [Google Scholar]
  369. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207 [Google Scholar]
  370. Zaccaro, S.J., Green, J.P., Dubrow, S. and Kolze, M.J. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Kąciak, Eugeniusz & Koźmiński, Andrzej K. (2019). Kąciak, E.. (2019). Managerial Discretion and Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model. Central European Management Journal, 27(2), 2-32. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.250 (Original work published 2019)

MLA style

Kąciak, Eugeniusz and Koźmiński, Andrzej K.. Kąciak, E.. “Managerial Discretion And Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model”. 2019. Central European Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, 2019, pp. 2-32.

Chicago style

Kąciak, Eugeniusz and Koźmiński, Andrzej K.. Kąciak, Eugeniusz . “Managerial Discretion And Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 27, no. 2 (2019): 2-32. doi:10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.250.

Copyright info

copyright info

CC-BY-NC-ND

People also read: