en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Show issue
Year 2017 
Volume 25 
Issue 4

Open Models of Innovation Processes as a Future Management Challenge for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Poland

Monika Zajkowska
WSB University in Gdańsk

2017 25 (4) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.214


Purpose: The increasing pace of technological progress, hyper-competitiveness, volatility of markets, dominant in the contemporary society all cause signifcant changes in the approach to innovation and lead to the emergence of a new generation of models of innovation processes. An open innovation model is based on a systematic search for as well as research and use of various sources of opportunities for innovations that offer commercial potential. The main objective of this article is to analyse the possibilities of application of models of open innovation in management of micro, small, and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Poland. This article intends to explore the essence of open innovation by values, its inception, and conditions for its implementation in the management process specifc to the SME sector.

Methodology: The study has been based on in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted among business managers/owners responsible for innovation development of SMEs in Poland (16 interviews in total).

Findings: SMEs usually do not have their own research and development (R&D) departments, but need external support and R&D solutions tailored to their needs. SMEs need innovations and skills, which requires close cooperation with different partners. In order for SMEs to beneft from innovation processes, a structured cooperation not only with scientists and researchers, but also with other market partners needs to be established and intensifed. It changes both the creation of intellectual capital and the ways to manage it.

Originality: The new approach in the context of management of innovation is now one of the key challenges faced by smaller businesses. It is necessary to make changes in the approach to integration of external sources of innovation with the potential and resources at the disposal of a given company.


  1. Baloh, P., Jha, S. and Awazu, Y. (2008). Building Strategic Partnerships for Managing Innovation Outsourcing. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 1(2): 100–121: [Google Scholar]
  2. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538290810897138 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bianchi, M., Orto, S.C., Frattini, F. and P. Vercesi, P. (2010). Enabling Open Innovation in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: How to Find Alternative Applications for Your Technologies. R and D Management, 40(4): 414–430, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00613.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Britten, N. (1999). Qualitative interviews in healthcare. In: C. Pope and N. Mays (eds.) Qualitative research in health care. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books: 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chariomonte, F. (2006). Open Innovation Through Alliances and Partnership: Theory and Practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(2–3): 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chesbrough, H. and Schwartz, K. (2007). Innovating Business Models with Co-Development Partnerships, Research Technology Management, 50(1): 55–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657419 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chesbrough, H. (2002). Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review, 4–11(March). [Google Scholar]
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chesbrough, H. and Crowther, A.K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3): 229–236, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (eds.) (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Collis, J., Hussey, R. and Hussey, J. (2003). Business research: a practical guide to undergraduate and postgraduate students, 2nd edit., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cooper, R.G. (2007). Managing Technology Development Projects. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 53/1, https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2007.329141 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahlander, L. and Gann, D.M. (2010). How Open is Innovation? Research Policy, 39(6): 699–709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dec, D. (2011). Firmy typu spin off i spin out. Poradnik dla osób chcących założyć działalność gospodarczą. Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ebersberger, B., Herstad, S.J., Iversen, E., Kirchner, E., Som, O. (2011). Open Innovation in Europe: Effects, Determianants and Policy, Report of research carried out under the initiative PROINNO realized by the Directorate. Enterprise and Industry. European Commission, Oslo, http://bit.ly/IGx6Om (21.01.2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda. R and D Management, 36(3): 22–228, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. (2005). Open Innovation Forschung. In: M. Weissenberger-Eib (ed.), Gestaltung von Innovationssystemen. Kassel: Cactus Group Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes, paper presented at the conference: R&D Management Conference (RADMA), Lisbon, 06–09.07.2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Griffiths-Hemans, J. and Grover, R. (2006). Setting the Stage for Creative New Products: Investigating the Idea Fruition Process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(1): 27–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305281777 [Google Scholar]
  20. Henkel, J. (2006). Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux, Research Policy, 35(7): 953–969, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  21. Inauen, M. and Schenker-Wicki, A. (2011). The Impact of Outside-In Open Innovation on Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4): 496–520, https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174934 [Google Scholar]
  22. Janasz, W., Janasz, K., Prozorowicz, M., Świadek, A. and Wiśniewska, J. (2002). Determinanty innowacyjności przedsiębiorstw. Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński. [Google Scholar]
  23. Keupp, M.M. and Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation, R&D Management 39(4): 331–341, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00563.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M. and Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and External Integration for Product Development: The Contingency, Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy. Decision Science, 36(1): 97–133, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2005.00067.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27: 131–150, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lazzarotti, V. Manzini, R. and Pellegrini, L. (2010). Open Innovation Models Adopted in Practice: An Extensive Study in Italy. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(4): 11–23, https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011093721 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lecocq, X. and Demil, B. (2006). Strategizing industry structure: the case of open systems in low-tech industry. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 891–898; https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.544 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions. IEEE Transaction, 55(1): 148–157, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912932 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Opening Up Strategic Technology Planning: Extended Roadmaps and Functional Markets, Management Decision 46(1): 77–91, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810846752 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1): 75–93, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.59198451 [Google Scholar]
  31. Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D. and Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs, Journal of Small Business Management 47(4): 465–488, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x [Google Scholar]
  32. OECD, & Eurostat (2005). In: Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Statistical Office of the European Communities. [Google Scholar]
  33. Parida, V., Westerberg, M., Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High-Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2): 283–309, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Entrepreneurship in Poland (2016). Ministry of Development. Warsaw. [Google Scholar]
  35. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  36. Simard, C. and West, J. (2006). Knowledge Networks and the Geographic Locus of Innovation. In: H.W. Chesbrough, Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Van De Vrande, V., De Jong, J.P.J., Vanhaverbeke, W. and De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, Motives and Management Challenges. Technovation 29(6–7): 423–437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001 [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Zajkowska, Monika (2017). Zajkowska, M. . (2017). Open Models of Innovation Processes as a Future Management Challenge for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Poland. Central European Management Journal, 25(4), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.214 (Original work published 2017)

MLA style

Zajkowska, Monika. Zajkowska, M. . “Open Models Of Innovation Processes As A Future Management Challenge For Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises In Poland”. 2017. Central European Management Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, 2017, pp. 193-208.

Chicago style

Zajkowska, Monika. Zajkowska, Monika . “Open Models Of Innovation Processes As A Future Management Challenge For Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises In Poland”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 25, no. 4 (2017): 193-208. doi:10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.214.