en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 12/2021 
Tom 29 
Numer 4

Does Psychic Distance Still Matter? Empirical Evidence from Poland

Krzysztof Fonfara
Poznań University of Economics and Business

Aleksandra Hauke-Lopes
Poznań University of Economics and Business

Marcin Soniewicki
Poznań University of Economics and Business

12/2021 29 (4) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.59

Zawartość artykułu

Abstrakt

Objective: The objective of the article is to fill a research gap regarding the impact of psychic distance on the initiation of relationships by managers from Poland-based firms and to analyze the psychic distance’s influence on firm performance.

Research methodology: The article is based on quantitative research conducted among managers from 201 Poland-based companies operating in foreign markets. The study used a structured questionnaire consisting mainly of closed questions. The dataset contained companies representing all sizes, industries, and ownership status from all over Poland.

Findings: Two types of companies were identified following managers’ (un)willingness to initiate relationships with actors located in psychically distant markets. The study conclusions reveal that psychic distance matters for Polish managers and that business activities conducted in psychically distant markets are often perceived as more complex than in close markets. These activities involve additional risk, but they bring companies better performance.

Limitations: The limitation of the study is that the measurements are based on the subjective perceptions of psychic distance. The research was conducted in Poland only.

Originality: The article is a pioneer work on the psychic distance paradox among Polish managers from a diversified group of companies (from small to multinational). The article seeks to identify to what extent Polish managers perceive psychic distance as an important factor in the decision-making process concerning the initiation of relationships with foreign partners.

Powiązania

  1. Amal, M., Baffour Awuah, G., Raboch, H., and Anderson, S. (2013). Differences and Similarities of the Internationalization Processes of Multinational Companies from Developed and Emerging Countries. European Business Review, 25(5), 955–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-08-2012-0048. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambos, B., and Håkanson, L. (2014). The Concept of Distance in International Management Research. Journal of International Management, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.10.003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambos, B., Leicht-Deobald, U. and Leinemann, A. (2019). Understanding the Formation of Psychic Distance Perceptions: Are Country-Level or Individual-Level Factors More Important?, International Business Review, 28(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.01.003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Azar, G., and Drogendijk, R. (2014). Psychic Distance, Innovation, and Firm Performance. Management International Review, 54(5), 581–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0219-2. [Google Scholar]
  5. Azar, G., and Drogendijk, R. (2016). Cultural Distance, Innovation and Export Performance: An Examination of Perceived and Objective Cultural Distance. European Business Review, 28(2), 176–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-06-2015-0065. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergkvist, L., and Rossiter, J.R. (2007). The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–84. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bodlaj, M., and Vida, I. (2018). Factors Underlying Cultural and Psychic Distance in Cross-National Activities of Export Managers: Qualitative Insights from a CEE Country. Journal of East European Management Studies, 23(3), 351–76. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2018-3-351. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brewer, P.A. (2007). Operationalizing Psychic Distance: A Revised Approach. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.1.044. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chapman, M., Gajewska-De Mattos, H., Clegg, J. and Buckley, P.J. (2008). Close Neighbours and Distant Friends-Perceptions of Cultural Distance. International Business Review, 17, 217–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.01.007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Christophersen, T., and Konradt, U. (2011). Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of a Single-Item Measure of Online Store Usability. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(4): 269–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.005. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ciszewska-Mlinarič, M., Obłój, K., and Hülsdau, M. (2019). Post-Entry Strategic Significance of Export Market: How Does Psychic Distance Work? The Evidence from European SMEs.” Journal of East European Management Studies, 24(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2019-2-235. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ciszewska-Mlinarič, M., and Trąpczyński, P. (2016). The Psychic Distance Concept : A Review of 25 Years of Research (1990–2015). Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 24(2), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.167. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciszewska-Mlinarič, M., Wójcik, P., and Obłój, K. (2020). Learning Dynamics of Rapidly Internationalizing Venture: Beyond the Early Stage of International Growth in a CEE Context. Journal of Business Research, 108(January), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.002. [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark, B.H. (2000). Managerial Perceptions of Marketing Performance: Efficiency, Adaptability, Effectiveness and Satisfaction. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/096525400346286. [Google Scholar]
  15. Datta, Deepak K., and Puia, G. (1995). Cross-Border Acquisitions: An Examination of the Influence of Relatedness and Cultural Fit on Shareholder Value Creation in U. S. Acquiring Firms. Management International Review, 35(4), 337–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/40228285. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deszczyński, B., Fonfara, K., and Dymitrowski, A. (2017). The Role of Relationships in Initiating the Internationalisation Process in B2B Markets. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050404. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dikova, D. (2009). Performance of Foreign Subsidiaries: Does Psychic Distance Matter? International Business Review, 18(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.11.001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dinner, I.M., Kushwaha, T., and Benedict, J.-B., Steenkamp, E.M.M. (2019). Psychic Distance and Performance of MNCs during Marketing Crises. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(3), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0187-z. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dow, D., Baack, D., and Parente, R. (2020). The Role of Psychic Distance in Entry Mode Decisions: Magnifying the Threat of Opportunism or Increasing the Need for Local Knowledge? Global Strategy Journal, 10(2), 309–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1309. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dow, D., and Ferencikova, S. (2010). More than Just National Cultural Distance: Testing New Distance Scales on FDI in Slovakia. International Business Review, 19(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.11.001. [Google Scholar]
  21. Drogendijk, R., and Slangen, A. (2006). Hofstede, Schwartz, or Managerial Perceptions? The Effects of Different Cultural Distance Measures on Establishment Mode Choices by Multinational Enterprises. International Business Review, 15(4), 361–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.05.003. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eccles, R. (1991). The Performance Measurement Manifesto. Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 131–37. https://hbr.org/1991/01/the-performance-measurement-manifesto. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis, P.D. (2008). Does Psychic Distance Moderate the Market Size–Entry Sequence Relationship? Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 351–69. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400360. [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans, J., and Mavondo, F.T. (2002). Psychic Distance and Organisational Performance: An Empirical Examination of International Retailing Operations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491029. [Google Scholar]
  25. Evans, J., Treadgold, A., and Mavondo, F.T. (2000). Psychic Distance and the Performance of International Retailers – A Suggested Theoretical Framework. International Marketing Review, 17(4/5), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330010339905. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fahy, J., Hooley, G., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K. and Gabrijan, V. (2003). Privatisation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Emerging Economies of Central Europe. Management International Review, 43(4), 407. https://doi.org/10.2307/40835942. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fonfara, K., Ratajczak-Mrozek, M., and Małys, Ł. (red.) (2018). The Internationalisation Maturity of the Firm. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fonfara, K. (2009). Zachowanie przedsiębiorstwa w procesie internacjonalizacji: podejście sieciowe. Warszawa: PWE. [Google Scholar]
  29. Garson, D. (2013). Survey Research & Sampling (Statistical Associates “Blue Book” Series Book 7). Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associate Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  30. Håkanson, L. (2014). The Role of Psychic Distance in International Trade: A Longitudinal Analysis. International Marketing Review, 31, 210–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2013-0079. [Google Scholar]
  31. Håkanson, L., and Ambos, B. (2010). The Antecedents of Psychic Distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.06.001. [Google Scholar]
  32. Håkansson, H., and Snehota, I. (red.) (2017). No Business Is an Island: Making Sense of the Interactive Business World. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787145498. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hauke-Lopes, A. (2018). Znaczenie Dystansu Psychicznego w Rozwoju Relacji Biznesowych Na Rynku Zagranicznym. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XIX(2), 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hooley, G., Fahy, J., Greenley, G., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K., and Snoj, B. (2003). Market Orientation in the Service Sector of the Transition Economies of Central Europe. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1/2), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310453975. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hutzschenreuter, Th., Kleindienst, I., and Lange, S. (2014). Added Psychic Distance Stimuli and MNE Performance Effects of Added Cultural, Governance, Geographic, and Economic Distance in MNEs’ International Expansion. Journal of International Management, 20, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.02.003. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hutzschenreuter, Th., Kleindienst, I., and Lange, S. (2015). The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12065. [Google Scholar]
  37. Johanson, J., and Vahlne Jan-Erik. 2009. “The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership.” Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–31. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24. [Google Scholar]
  38. Johanson, J., and Wiedersheim, P. (1975). The Internationalization Process of the Firm- Four Swedish Case Studies. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00514.x. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard – Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kłysik-Uryszek, A., and Kuna-Marszałek, A. (2014). Psychic and Geographic Distance in the Process of Firm Internationalization. Example of Companies from Poland and Lodz Region. Business and Economic Horizons, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2014.01. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kontinen, T., and Ojala, A. (2010). Internationalization Pathways of Family SMEs: Psychic Distance as a Focal Point. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 437–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068725. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, S.Y.H., Deligonul, S., Tamer Cavusgil, S., and Shen Chiou, J. (2021). Addressing Psychic Distance and Learning in International Buyer-Seller Relationships: The Role of Firm Exploration and Asset Specificity. Journal of World Business, 56(4), 1090–9516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101208. [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, Yadong, Oded, Mee-Kau Shenkar, and Nyaw (2001). A Dual Parent Perspective on Control and Performance in International. Journal of International Business Studies, 32. [Google Scholar]
  44. Magnani, G., Zucchella, A., Eliete Floriani, D., and Floriani, E. (2018). The Logic behind Foreign Market Selection: Objective Distance Dimensions vs. Strategic Objectives and Psychic Distance. International Business Review, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.10.009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Maseland, R., Dow, D., and Steel, P. (2018).“The Kogut and Singh National Cultural Distance Index: Time to Start Using It as a Springboard Rather than a Crutch.” Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 1154–66. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0183-3. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mithani, Murad A. (2017). Liability of Foreignness, Natural Disasters, and Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 941–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0104-x. [Google Scholar]
  47. Moalla, E., and Mayrhofer, U. (2020). How Does Distance Affect Market Entry Mode Choice? Evidence from French Companies. European Management Journal, 38(1), 135–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.08.002. [Google Scholar]
  48. Musso, F., and Francioni, B. (2012). How Do Smaller Firms Select Foreign Markets ? International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(6), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v4n6p44. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nagy, M.S. (2002). Using a Single-Item Approach to Measure Facet Job Satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902167658. [Google Scholar]
  50. Navarro-García, A., Peris-Oritz, M. and Barrera-Barrera, R. (2016). Market Intelligence Effect on Perceived Psychic Distance, Strategic Behaviours and Export Performance in Industrial SMEs. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(3), 365–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2013-0065. [Google Scholar]
  51. Nebus, J., and Kah Hin Chai (2014). Putting the ‘Psychic’ Back in Psychic Distance: Awareness, Perceptions, and Understanding as Dimensions of Psychic Distance. Journal of International Management, 20(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.intman. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nizielska, A. (2013). The Role of Psychic Distance in the Process of Companies Internationalization – Review of Research Results. Journal of Economics & Management, 13, 85–99. [Google Scholar]
  53. Nordman, E.R., and Tolstoy, D. (2014). Does Relationship Psychic Distance Matter for the Learning Processes of Internationalizing SMEs? International Business Review, 23(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.010. [Google Scholar]
  54. O’Grady, Shawna, and Lane, H.W. (1996). The Psychic Distance Paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/155287. [Google Scholar]
  55. OECD-ilibrary (2021). Foreign direct investment (FDI). Obtained from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/foreign-direct-investment-fdi/indicator-group/english_9a523b18-en https://doi.org/10.1787/9a523b18-en. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ojala, A. (2015). Geographic, Cultural, and Psychic Distance to Foreign Markets in the Context of Small and New Ventures. International Business Review, 24(5), 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.02.007. [Google Scholar]
  57. Olejnik-Nizielska, A. (2018). Managers’ Perceptions about the Importance of Psychic Distance in the Process of Companies’ Internationalization – Company G Case. Przedsiębiorczosć i Zarządzanie, XIX(2), 231–39. [Google Scholar]
  58. Paul, J., and Criado, A.R. (2020). The Art of Writing Literature Review: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pla-Barber, J. (2001). The Internalisation of Foreign Distribution and Production Activities New Empirical Evidence from Spain. International Business Review, 10. www.elsevier.com/locate/ibusrev. [Google Scholar]
  60. Postmes, T., Haslam, T.A., and Jans, L. (2013). A Single-Item Measure of Social Identification: Reliability, Validity, and Utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12006. [Google Scholar]
  61. Puthusserry, P., Khan, Z., Nair, S.R., and King, T. (2021). Mitigating Psychic Distance and Enhancing Internationalization of Fintech SMEs from Emerging Markets: The Role of Board of Directors. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12502. [Google Scholar]
  62. Safari, A., and Chetty, S. (2019). Multilevel Psychic Distance and Its Impact on SME Internationalization. International Business Review, 28(4), 754–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.03.001. [Google Scholar]
  63. Santos, J.C., Barandas-Karl, H., and Martins, F.V. (2017). The Psychic Distance Hazards in Cross-Border Acquisition Performance: An Empirical Study of Cross-Border Acquisitions from 26 Countries. Distance in International Business: Concept, Cost and Value, 183–206. https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/S1745-886220170000012010. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sousa, C.M.P., and Bradley, F. (2006). Cultural Distance and Psychic Distance: Two Peas in a Pod? Journal of International Marketing, 14(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.14.1.49. [Google Scholar]
  65. Trade Map (2019). Trade Statistics for International Business Development. https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tung, R.L., and Stahl, G.K. (2018). The Tortuous Evolution of the Role of Culture in IB Research: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and Where We Are Headed. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 1167–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0184-2. [Google Scholar]
  67. Tuzová, M., Toulová, M., Straka, J. and Kubíčková, L. (2015). Can Uppsala Model Explain the Internationalisation of Central European SMEs? European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 1(2), 149–64. www.ejobsat.com. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vahlne, J.-E., and Johanson, J. (2017). From Internationalization to Evolution: The Uppsala Model at 40 Years. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0107-7. [Google Scholar]
  69. Verbeke, A., and Wenlong, Y. (2016). The Impact of ‘Distance’ on Multinational Enterprise Subsidiary Capabilities: A Value Chain Perspective. Multinational Business Review, 24(2): 168–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-05-2015-0021. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wach, K. (2015). Entrepreneurship without Borders: Do Borders Matter for International Entrepreneurship? Problemy Zarzadzania, 1(51), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.51.6. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yip, G.S., Biscarri, J.G. and Monti, J.A. (2003). The Role of the Internationalization Process in the Performance of Newly Internationalizing Firms. Journal of International Marketing 8(3), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.8.3.10.19635. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M.S., and Nachum, L. (2012). Distance without Direction: Restoring Credibility to a Much-Loved Construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.43. [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Fonfara, Krzysztof & Hauke-Lopes, Aleksandra & Soniewicki, Marcin (2021). Does Psychic Distance Still Matter? Empirical Evidence from Poland. (2021). Does Psychic Distance Still Matter? Empirical Evidence from Poland. Central European Management Journal, 29(4), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.59 (Original work published 12/2021n.e.)

MLA style

Fonfara, Krzysztof and Hauke-Lopes, Aleksandra and Soniewicki, Marcin. „Does Psychic Distance Still Matter? Empirical Evidence From Poland”. 12/2021n.e. Central European Management Journal, t. 29, nr 4, 2021, ss. 32–56.

Chicago style

Fonfara, Krzysztof and Hauke-Lopes, Aleksandra and Soniewicki, Marcin. „Does Psychic Distance Still Matter? Empirical Evidence From Poland”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 29, nr 4 (2021): 32–56. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.59.

Prawa autorskie

copyright info

CC-BY

Podobne artykuły: