en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Show issue
Year 12/2021 
Volume 29 
Issue 4

Value Co-Creation in Engineering Service Innovation: Resources and Capabilities Perspectives

Gintarė Gegužytė
Kaunas University of Technology School of Economics and Business

Liudmila Bagdonienė
Kaunas University of Technology School of Economics and Business

12/2021 29 (4) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.61


Purpose: This research focuses on firm resources and capabilities used for value co-creation in service innovation. Specifically, I investigated how service innovation is created in an in-ternational engineering company. The aim of this article is to reveal what resources and capa-bilities are employed by a service provider for value co-creation in the innovation project of engineering service and how they vary in particular stages of this project.

Methodology: The research is based on qualitative methodology by a multi-case study strate-gy. Focus group discussion with senior managers and semi-structured interviews with project managers of the studied international engineering company were used as concrete data gather-ing methods. Data analysis was conducted using the content analysis method.

Findings: The research revealed eight value co-creation activities accomplished by the engi-neering company and client during the engineering service innovation project. The activities are as follows: co-identification of the client’s problem, co-evaluation of ideas, co-defining of client’s requirements, co-analysis of environment, co-design, co-testing, and co-adoption, co-production, and co-activities after the launch. These activities are diffused in different project stages and demand a range of resources: expert knowledge, diagnostic, communication skills, trust, experience, technological equipment, human resources. Moreover, they require diverse capabilities: relational, innovative, analytical, negotiation, knowledge absorptive, planning, organizational flexibility, and cross-cultural. The intensity and variety of using the mentioned resources and capabilities differ relying on the value co-creation activity. Expert knowledge, communication skills as resources, and relational and innovative capabilities were empha-sized by the researchers most often. We hope these findings will represent a step toward a more coherent resource-based view (RBV) and service innovation theories.

Implications: The study involved only one Lithuanian engineering company, so the research context may influence the findings. Another limitation is related to the small number of cases and research participants.

Originality: Unlike previous studies that revealed the importance of single resources and ca-pabilities for service innovation, this study determined the range of resources and capabilities employed in different activities of engineering service innovation project stages, especially in the value co-creation activities performed by the engineering company and clients. Moreover, research also identified how resources and capabilities vary at different stages of these pro-jects.


  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Jaakkola, E. (2012). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal, A.K. and Rahman, Z. (2015). Roles and resource contributions of customers in value co-creation. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.03.001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akaka, M.A. and Vargo, S.L. (2014). Technology as an operant resource in service (eco) systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0220-5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, S., Bailetti, T. and Tanev, S. (2009). Components of Co-creation. Open Source Business Resource (No-vember 2009). Obtained from: http://timreview.ca/article/301 (the date of access 24.06.2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. Anandarajan, M., Hill, C. and Nolan, T. (2018). Practical Text Analytics: Maximizing the Value of Text Data. Cham: Springer Nature Switerland, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95663-3_3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Antwi, S.K., and Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217–225. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arnould, E.J. (2008). Service-dominant logic and resource theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sci-ence, 36(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0072-y. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baark, E. (2001). Routines and innovation in engineering consultancy services. In: Nelson and Winter Confer-ence, Aalborg, Denmark. Obtained from: http://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/3519. [Google Scholar]
  9. Balaji, M.S. and Roy, S.K. (2017). Value co-creation with Internet of things technology in the retail indus-try. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1–2), 7–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1217914. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108. [Google Scholar]
  11. Barney, J. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  12. Baxter, P. and Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Nov-ice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–556. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bello, D.C., Radulovich, L.P., Javalgi, R.R.G., Scherer, R.F. and Taylor, J. (2016). Performance of professional service firms from emerging markets: Role of innovative services and firm capabilities. Journal of World Busi-ness, 51(3), 413–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.11.004. [Google Scholar]
  14. Benazzouz, N.M. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation intensity: A synthetic literature re-view. International Entrepreneurship Review, 5, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2019.0502.02. [Google Scholar]
  15. Beraha, A., Bingol, D., Ozkan-Canbolat, E. and Szczygiel, N. (2018). The effect of strategic flexibility configu-rations on product innovation. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 129–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-02-2018-0028. [Google Scholar]
  16. Biedenbach, T. and Müller, R. (2012). Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on pro-ject and project portfolio performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonamigo, A., Dettmann, B., Frech, C.G., and Werner, S.M. (2020). Facilitators and inhibitors of value co-creation in the industrial services environment. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30(6), 609–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-03-2020-0061. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bond-Barnard, T.J., Fletcher, L.,and Steyn, H. (2018). Linking trust and collaboration in project teams to project management success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 432–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0068. [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell, N., O’Driscoll, A. and Saren, M. (2013). Reconceptualizing resources: a critique of service-dominant logic. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713497755. [Google Scholar]
  20. Carroll, N. and Helfert, M. (2015). Service capabilities within open innovation: Revisiting the applicability of capability maturity models. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(2), 275–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2013-0078. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, K.H., Wang, C.H., Huang, S.Z. and Shen, G.C. (2016). Service innovation and new product performance: The influence of market-linking capabilities and market turbulence. International Journal of Production Eco-nomics, 172, 54–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.11.004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Christensen, C.M. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Das, T.K., and Kumar, R. (2010). Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances. Management Decision, 48(1), 17–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741011014436. [Google Scholar]
  24. Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00037-9. [Google Scholar]
  25. DeFillippi, R., and Roser, T. (2014). Aligning the co-creation project portfolio with company strategy. Strategy & Leadership, 42(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-10-2013-0075. [Google Scholar]
  26. Duffy, M.G. (2008). Managing projects: expert solutions to everyday challenges. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  27. Edvardsson, B. and Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in S-D logic and service systems. International Journal of Quality & Service Sciences, 5(1), 19–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17566691311316220. [Google Scholar]
  28. Edvardsson, B., Meiren, T., Schäfer, A., and Witell, L. (2013). Having a strategy for new service development–does it really matter? Journal of Service Management, 24(1), 25–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09564231311304170. [Google Scholar]
  29. Eslami, M.H. and Lakemond, N. (2016). Knowledge integration with customers in collaborative product devel-opment projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(7), 889–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2014-0099. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fellows, R., and Liu, A. (2016). Sensemaking in the cross-cultural contexts of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 246–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.010. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fitzsimmons, J.A., and Fitzsimmons, M.J. (2006). Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information Technology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  32. Flor, M.L., Cooper, S.Y. and Oltra, M.J. (2018). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal, 36(2), 183–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.08.003. [Google Scholar]
  33. Forés, B. and Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Froehle, C.M., and Roth, A.V. (2007). A resource‐process framework of new service development. Production and Operations Management, 16(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00174.x. [Google Scholar]
  35. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A. and Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing Co‐creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087. [Google Scholar]
  36. Galvagno, M. and Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Ser-vice Quality, 24(6), 643–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0187. [Google Scholar]
  37. García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V.J., and Martín-Rojas, R. (2018). Influence of technological assets on organizational performance through absorptive capacity, organizational innovation and internal labour flexibil-ity. Sustainability, 10(3), 770–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10030770. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gemser, G. and Perks, H. (2015). Co‐Creation with Customers: An Evolving Innovation Research Field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 660–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12279. [Google Scholar]
  39. Giannopoulou, E., Gryszkiewicz, L. and Barlatier, P.-J. (2011). A conceptual model for the development of ser-vice innovation capabilities in research and technology organizations. International Journal of Knowledge Man-agement Studies, 4(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2011.048441. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W. and Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.722. [Google Scholar]
  41. Grafmüller, L.K. (2020). Co-creation of High-tech Products in the B2B Domain. Wiesbaden:Springer Gabler. [Google Scholar]
  42. Grant, R.M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166664. [Google Scholar]
  43. Green, J. and Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  44. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408177. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gryszkiewicz, L., Giannopoulou, E. and Barlatier, P.J. (2013). Service innovation capabilities: what are they? International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, 22, 5(1–2), 125–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSEM.2013.051857. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gummesson, E., Mele, C., Polese, F., Mele, C., Spena, T.R., and Colurcio, M. (2010). Co‐creating value innova-tion through resource integration. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691011026603. [Google Scholar]
  47. Helkkula, A., Kowalkowski, C. and Tronvoll, B. (2018). Archetypes of service innovation: implications for value cocreation. Journal of Service Research, 21(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517746776. [Google Scholar]
  48. Henrie, M.E. (2014). Cultural Influences in Engineering Projects. New York: Momentum Press. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hervas-Oliver, J.L. and Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2015). Disentangling the influence of technological process and product innovations. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hogan, S.J., Soutar, G.N., McColl-Kennedy, J.R. and Sweeney, J.C. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1264–1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.002. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Re-search, 15(9), 1277–1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hsieh, J.K. and Hsieh, Y.C. (2015). Dialogic co-creation and service innovation performance in high-tech com-panies. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2266–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.009. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hunt, S.D. (2000). A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220321. [Google Scholar]
  54. Islam, M.A., Agarwal, N.K. and Ikeda, M. (2015). Conceptualizing value co-creation for service innovation in academic libraries. Business Information Review, 32(1), 45–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266382115573155. [Google Scholar]
  55. Janteng, J. and Tan, C.L. (2017). Effects of Value Co-Creation on Innovation Capability: Knowledge Sharing as a Moderator. In: E. Tsui and B. Cheung (ed.), ICICKM 2017 14th International Conference on Intellectual Capi-tal Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning: ICICKM 2017 (pp. 116–121). Reading: Academic Con-ferences and Publishing International Limited. [Google Scholar]
  56. Johnsen, R.E. and Ford, D. (2006). Interaction capability development of smaller suppliers in relationships with larger customers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 1002–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.05.005. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jouny-Rivier, E., Reynoso, J. and Edvardsson, B. (2017). Determinants of services co-creation with business customers. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0001. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kantola, J. and Karwowski, W. (eds.). (2016). Knowledge service engineering handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Obtained from: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12043. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kaszowska-Mojsa, J. (2020). Innovation strategies of manufacturing companies during expansions and slowdowns. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080403. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kazadi, K., Lievens, A. and Mahr, D. (2016). Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 525–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.009. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kim, S.M. (2020). Payment Methods and Finance for International Trade. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim, M., Song, J. and Triche, J. (2015). Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(3), 533–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9505-6. [Google Scholar]
  63. Koryak, O., Mole, K.F., Lockett, A., Hayton, J.C., Ucbasaran, D. and Hodgkinson, G.P. (2015). Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614558315. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kusa, R. (2020). Linking relational capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation of an organization. International Entrepreneurship Review, 6(3), 49–60. https://doLorg/10.15678/IER.2020.0603.04. [Google Scholar]
  65. Legum, B.M., Stiles, A.R. and Vondran, J.L. (2019). Engineering Innovation. From idea to market through con-cepts and case studies. De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lichtenstein, B.M. and Brush, C.G. (2001). How do ‘‘resource bundles’’ develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500303. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lindgreen, A., Hingley, M.K., Grant, D.B. and Morgan, R.E. (2012). Value in business and industrial marketing: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 207–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.025. [Google Scholar]
  68. Löfsten, H. (2016). Organisational capabilities and the long-term survival of new technology-based firms. European Business Review, 28(3), 312–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EBR-04-2015-0041. [Google Scholar]
  69. Løwendahl, B.R. (2005). Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms. 3rd ed. Koge: Copenhagen Busi-ness Scholl Press. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mahr, D., Lievens, A. and Blazevic, V. (2014). The value of customer cocreated knowledge during the innova-tion process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 599–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12116. [Google Scholar]
  71. Mainga, W. (2017). Examining project learning, project management competencies, and project efficiency in project-based firms (PBFs). International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), 454–504, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2016-0035. [Google Scholar]
  72. Malhotra, N. and Morris, T. (2009). Heterogeneity in professional service firms. Journal of Management Stud-ies, 46(6), 895–922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00826.x. [Google Scholar]
  73. Marcos-Cuevas, J., Nätti, S., Palo, T., and Baumann, J. (2016). Value co-creation practices and capabilities: Sustained purposeful engagement across B2B systems. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.012. [Google Scholar]
  74. Marinkovic, S., Jovanovic, M. and Petkovic, J. (2017). Co-creation as innovation model in ICT based ser-vices. In: P. Ketikidis and A. Solomon (eds.), Conference proceedings University-Industry Links: Coproducing Knowledge, Innovation & Growth (pp. 285–292). [Google Scholar]
  75. Michel, S., Brown, S. W. and Gallan, A.S. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0066-9. [Google Scholar]
  76. Miller, R. and Lessard, D. (2001). Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 437–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00045-X. [Google Scholar]
  77. Miller, R. and Lessard, D.R. (2001a). The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Insti-tutions, Risks, and Governance. MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6478.001.0001. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ngugi, I.K., Johnsen, R.E. and Erdélyi, P. (2010). Relational capabilities for value co-creation and innovation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(2), 260–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626001011041256. [Google Scholar]
  79. Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H. (2017). Project management for engineering, business and technology. Fourth edi-tion. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  80. O’Connor, G.C. (2008). Major innovation as a dynamic capability: A systems approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., Brown, S.W., Burkhard, K.A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., Demirkan, H. and Rab-inovich, E. (2010). Moving forward and making a difference: research priorities for the science of service. Jour-nal of Service Research, 13(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509357611. [Google Scholar]
  82. Paradkar, A., Knight, J. and Hansen, P. (2015). Innovation in start-ups: Ideas filling the void or ideas devoid of resources and capabilities? Technovation, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.004. [Google Scholar]
  83. Paredes, M.R., Barrutia, J.M. and Echebarria, C. (2014). Resources for value co-creation in e-commerce: a re-view. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9135-6. [Google Scholar]
  84. Pezzotta, G., Cavalieri, S. and Romero, D. (2017). Collaborative product-service systems engineering: Towards an active role of customers and stakeholders in value co-creation. In: 2017 International Conference on Engi-neering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1247–1254). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280023. [Google Scholar]
  85. Plouffe, C. R., Nagel, D., Bonney, L., Hochstein, B. and Salas, J. (2020). The Austrian view and value co-creation process in solution-oriented firms: A seven stage,”solution prototyping” framework. Journal of Market-ing Theory and Practice, 28(1), 79–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2019.1671202. [Google Scholar]
  86. Queirós, A., Faria, D. and Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1017. [Google Scholar]
  87. Roller, M.R. and Lavrakas, P.J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework ap-proach. New York: Guildford Publications. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rusanen, H., Halinen, A., and Jaakkola, E. (2014). Accessing resources for service innovation–the critical role of network relationships. Journal of Service Management, 25(1), 2–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-10-2012-0219. [Google Scholar]
  89. Saeed, M.A., Jiao, Y., Zahid, M.M., Tabassum, H. and Nauman, S. (2020). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: the roles of innovation, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0058. [Google Scholar]
  90. Sáenz, J.; Aramburu, N. and Rivera, O. (2009). Knowledge sharing and innovation performance: A comparison between high-tech and low-tech companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910922879. [Google Scholar]
  91. Santos-Vijande, M.L., López-Sánchez, J.A. and Gonzalez-Mieres, C. (2012). Organizational learning, innova-tion, and performance in KIBS. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 870–904. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2012.18.6.870. [Google Scholar]
  92. Siegel, N.G. (2019). Engineering Project Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119525813. [Google Scholar]
  93. Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A. and Ireland, R.D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005. [Google Scholar]
  94. Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P. and Kristensson, P. (2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2401–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.009. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sørensen, F. and Lapenta, F. (2017). Service innovations research methods. In: F. Lapenta and F. Sørensen (eds.), Research Methods in Service Innovation (pp. 1–18). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781785364860.00007. [Google Scholar]
  96. Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of quali-tative research (3th ed., pp. 443–466). Thousands Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  97. Stelmaszczyk, M. (2020). How Absorptive Capacity and Organisational Learning Orientation Interact to Enable Innovation Capability? An Empirical Examination. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080101. [Google Scholar]
  98. Stošić, B. and Milutinović, R. (2017). Key Issues to Improve Innovation Project Excellence. In: B.L. Moya, M.D. Storch de Gracia and L.F. Mazadiego (eds.), Key Issues for Management of Innovative Projects, pp. 25–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/67504. [Google Scholar]
  99. Strønen, F., Hoholm, T., Kværner, K.J. and Støme, L.N. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and innovation capabili-ties: The case of the ‘Innovation Clinic.’ Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(1), 89–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.7341/20171314. [Google Scholar]
  100. Sułkowski, L. and Patora-Wysocka, Z. (2020). International entrepreneurship of universities: Process-oriented and capabilities perspectives. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080310. [Google Scholar]
  101. Teece, D.J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54. [Google Scholar]
  102. Ulin, P.R., Robinson, E.T. and Tolley, E.E. (2005). Qualitative Methods in Public Health. A Field Guide for Applied Research. 1st edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  103. Urueña, A., Hidalgo, A. and Arenas, Á.E. (2016). Identifying capabilities in innovation projects: Evidences from eHealth. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4843–4848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.041. [Google Scholar]
  104. van Ast, J.A. and Gerrits, L. (2017). Public participation, experts and expert knowledge in water management in the Netherlands. Water Policy, 19(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.253. [Google Scholar]
  105. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2008). Why service? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0068-7. [Google Scholar]
  106. Vargo, S.L., Wieland, H. and Akaka, M.A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.008. [Google Scholar]
  107. Von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.45577926. [Google Scholar]
  108. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  109. Zuo, J., Zhao, X., Nguyen, Q.B.M., Ma, T. and Gao, S. (2018). Soft skills of construction project management professionals and project success factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0016. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Gegužytė, Gintarė & Bagdonienė, Liudmila (2021). Value Co-Creation in Engineering Service Innovation: Resources and Capabilities Perspectives. (2021). Value Co-Creation in Engineering Service Innovation: Resources and Capabilities Perspectives. Central European Management Journal, 29(4), 91-123. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.61 (Original work published 12/2021AD)

MLA style

Gegužytė, Gintarė and Bagdonienė, Liudmila. “Value Co-Creation In Engineering Service Innovation: Resources And Capabilities Perspectives”. 12/2021AD. Central European Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, 2021, pp. 91-123.

Chicago style

Gegužytė, Gintarė and Bagdonienė, Liudmila. “Value Co-Creation In Engineering Service Innovation: Resources And Capabilities Perspectives”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 29, no. 4 (2021): 91-123. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.61.