en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Show issue
Year 12/2021 
Volume 29 
Issue 4

International Experts’ Influence on Company Internationalization

Grygorii Kravchenko
Kozminski University

12/2021 29 (4) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.60

Abstract

Purpose: The article evaluates the associative relationship between international supervisory board experts and foreign ownership, along with the experts’ influence on the financial and operating performance of firms. The study was based on data collected for 257 companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in 2010–2015.

Methodology: The dataset was built as a panel, and then generalized least squares regression models with a fixed or random effect were employed to test hypotheses.

Findings: The findings of the study clearly show that the presence of investigated firms in foreign markets positively affects company performance. Moreover, models with dependent variables ROA and ROS show that supervisory board members with foreign experience positively affect profitability indicators of firms that do not operate on foreign markets. The data analyses reveal that international experts are more effective advisors for companies that conduct no business activities on foreign markets. Furthermore, the results show a positive moderate association between the share of international experts in supervisory boards and the share of foreign ownership in the company.

Originality: The article contributes to the understanding of determinants and consequences of the presence of international experts in supervisory boards and company internationalization.

References

  1. Abdeljawad, I. and Masri, and R.M. (2020). Board Characteristics and Corporate Performance: Evidence From Palestine. An-Najah University Journal for Research-B (Humanities), 34(4). [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdullah, S.N. (2014). Board composition, CEO duality and performance among Malaysian listed Companies. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 4(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410558871. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abu, S.O., Okpeh, A.J., and Okpe, U.J. (2016). Board characteristics and financial performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.52.418.423. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adams, R.B., Hermalin, B.E., and Weisbach, M.S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58. [Google Scholar]
  5. Adeusi, S.O., Akeke, N.I., and Aribaba, F.O. (2013). Corporate governance and firm financial performance: Do ownership and board size matter? Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 77–91, https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n3p251. [Google Scholar]
  6. Afzali, H., Martikainen, M., Oxelheim, L., and Randøy, T. (2020). On the Role of Internationalization of Firm-Level Corporate Governance–The Case of Audit Committees (No. 1370). IFN Working Paper. Obtained from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/240513/1/wp1370.pdf (access: 25.10.2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. Amin, S.I.M. and Nor, S.M. (2019). Board diversity and firm performance in the construction, manufacturing, and trading/services industries. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Arellano, M., and Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968. [Google Scholar]
  9. Azutoru, I.H.C., Obinne, U.G., and Chinelo, O.O. (2017). Effect of corporate governance mechanisms on financial performance of insurance companies in Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(3), 93–103, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2019.8766. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barroso, C., Villegas, M.M., and Pérez‐Calero, L. (2011). Board influence on a firm's internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 351–367, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00859.x. [Google Scholar]
  11. Blundell, R., and Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boadi, I. and Osarfo, D. (2019). Diversity and return: the impact of diversity of board member education on performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(4), 824–842. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bradbury, M., Mak, Y.T., and Tan, S.M. (2006). Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review, 18(2), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580610732813. [Google Scholar]
  14. Breusch, T.S., and Pagan, A.R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911963. [Google Scholar]
  15. Buzavaite, M., and Korsakiene, R. (2019). Human Capital and the Internationalisation of SMEs: A Systemic Literature Review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070307. [Google Scholar]
  16. Calof, J.L., and Beamish, P.W. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization. International business review, 4(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(95)00001-G. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, H.L., Chang, C.Y., and Hsu, W.T. (2017). Does board Co-working experience influence directors’ decisions toward internationalization? Management International Review, 57(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0309-4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chizema, A., and Kim, J. (2010). Outside directors on Korean boards: Governance and institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00868.x. [Google Scholar]
  19. Choi, J.J., Park, S.W., and Yoo, S.S. (2007). The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 941–962. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000003458. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cook, R.D., and Weisberg, S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.1. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cuervo, A. (2002). Corporate governance mechanisms: A plea for less code of good governance and more market control. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(2), 84–93, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00272. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dedunu, H. and Anuradha, P.A.N.S. (2020). Impact of Board Diversity on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Research, 6(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijmier.2020.614. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dobija, D., and Kravchenko, G. (2017). Supervisory board composition and firm financial performance: a case of companies listed on the Warsaw stock exchange. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(4), 75–95, https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.208. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dobija, D., and Puławska, K. (2021). The influence of board members with foreign experience on the timely delivery of financial reports. Journal of Management and Governance, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09559-1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Duque‐Grisales, E., Aguilera‐Caracuel, J., Guerrero‐Villegas, J., and García‐Sánchez, E. (2020). Can proactive environmental strategy improve Multilatinas' level of internationalization? The moderating role of board independence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2377. [Google Scholar]
  26. Estélyi, K.S., and Nisar, T.M. (2016). Diverse boards: Why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards? Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94034. [Google Scholar]
  28. Frijns, B., Dodd, O. and Cimerova, H. (2016). The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.014. [Google Scholar]
  29. García‐Sánchez, I. M., and García‐Meca, E. (2018). Do talented managers invest more efficiently? The moderating role of corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(4), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12233. [Google Scholar]
  30. Giannetti, M., Liao, G. and Yu, X. (2012), The brain gain of corporate boards: A natural experiment from China. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Obtained from: http://www.ivey.uwo.ca/cmsmedia/163791/-gly_the_brain_gain_of_corporate_boards_april_21_2012.pdf (access: 11.02.2021). [Google Scholar]
  31. Giannetti, M., Liao, G., & Yu, X. (2015). The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China. The Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1629–1682. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12198. [Google Scholar]
  32. Goergen, M., and Tonks, I. (2019). Introduction to Special Issue on Sustainable Corporate Governance. British Journal of Management, 30(1), 3–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12325. [Google Scholar]
  33. González, C. (2019). Transnational board interlocks: the influence of degree of internationalization and psychic distance. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 10(4), https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2016-0043. [Google Scholar]
  34. Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., and Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150305. [Google Scholar]
  35. Grosfeld, I., and Hashi, I. (2007). Changes in ownership concentration in mass privatised firms: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 520–534, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00585.x. [Google Scholar]
  36. Guest, P.M. (2019). Does board ethnic diversity impact board monitoring outcomes? British Journal of Management, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12299. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gurbuz, A.O., and Aybars, A. (2010). The impact of foreign ownership on firm performance, evidence from an emerging market: Turkey. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2010.350.359. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hambrick, D.C., Davison, S.C., Snell, S.A., and Snow, C.C. (1998). When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies, 19(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900202. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hillman, A.J., Withers, M.C., and Collins, B.J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hooghiemstra, R., Hermes, N., Oxelheim, L., and Randøy, T. (2019). Strangers on the board: The impact of board internationalization on earnings management of Nordic firms. International Business Review, 28(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.007. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hossain, B. (2020). Director remuneration and performance: Evidence from the textile sector of Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.265. [Google Scholar]
  43. Imade, O.G. (2019). Board gender diversity, non-executive directors composition and corporate performance: evidence from listed firms in Nigeria. African Journal of Business Management, 13(9), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2019.8766. [Google Scholar]
  44. Isidro, H. and Sobral, M. (2014). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jackowicz, K., Kozłowski, Ł., and Mielcarz, P. (2014). Political connections and operational performance of non-financial firms: New evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 20, 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2014.06.005. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jakpar, S., Tinggi, M., Johari, A., and Myint, K.T. (2019). Analysis of Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Listed Companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v10n1p14. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jentsch, V. (2019). Board Composition, Ownership Structure and Firm Value: Empirical Evidence from Switzerland. European Business Organization Law Review, 20(2), 203–254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-00128-6. [Google Scholar]
  48. Joh, S.W., and Jung, J.Y. (2018). When do firms benefit from affiliated outside directors? Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(6), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12224. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S. and Pye, A. (2012). Antecedents of board composition: The role of nomination committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00913.x. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim, Y., and Cannella Jr, A.A. (2008). Toward a social capital theory of director selection. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 282–293, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00693.x. [Google Scholar]
  51. Knežević, G., Pavlović, V. and Bojičić, R. (2017). Does the board gender diversity impact financial performance in agriculture? Case of Serbian Agriculture Companies listed on Stock Exchange. Custos e agronegocio on line, 13(3), 2–20. [Google Scholar]
  52. Koładkiewicz, I. (2008). Praktyka polskich rad nadzorczych–z perspektywy jej zagranicznych członków. Organizacja, 100, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kumar, N., and Singh, J.P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kumar, P. and Zattoni, A. (2018). Corporate governance, boards of directors, and firm performance: Avenues for future research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(6), 394–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12262. [Google Scholar]
  55. Levin, D.Z., Whitener, E.M., and Cross, R. (2006). Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1163, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1163. [Google Scholar]
  56. Luo, Y. (2005). How does globalization affect corporate governance and accountability? A perspective from MNEs. Journal of International Management, 11(1), 19–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2004.11.003. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mangena, M., and Tauringana, V. (2007). Disclosure, corporate governance and foreign share ownership on the Zimbabwe stock exchange. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18(2), 53–85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-646X.2007.01008.x. [Google Scholar]
  58. Masulis, R.W., Wang, C. and Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom – The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.003. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mehmood, R., Hunjra, A.I. and Chani, M.I. (2019). The impact of corporate diversification and financial structure on firm performance: evidence from South Asian countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12010049. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mirza, N.I., Malik, Q.A. and Mahmood, C.K. (2020). The value of board diversity in the relationship of corporate governance and investment decisions of Pakistani firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040146. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mortimer, T. (2009). Corporate governance in Poland. Corporate Ownership and Control, 7(2), 382–389. [Google Scholar]
  62. Munisi, G., Hermes, N., and Randøy, T. (2014). Corporate boards and ownership structure: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. International Business Review, 23(4), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.12.001. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ngo, Q.H. (2021). The impact of market orientation on small businesses’ performance in Vietnam: The mediating effects of the management accounting system. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), 59–72 https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090304. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nielsen, B.B., and Nielsen, S. (2013). Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2021. [Google Scholar]
  65. Oxelheim, L., and Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00395-3. [Google Scholar]
  66. Oxelheim, L., and Randøy, T. (2013). Globalization of monitoring practices: The case of American influences on the dismissal risk of European CEOs. Journal of Economics and Business, 70, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.02.002. [Google Scholar]
  67. Park, Y.W., and Shin, H. H. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), 431–457. [Google Scholar]
  68. Peasnell, K.V., Pope, P.F., and Young, S. (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7–8), 1311–1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00630.x. [Google Scholar]
  69. Peij, S.C., Bezemer, P.J., and Maassen, G.F. (2012). The effectiveness of supervisory boards: an exploratory study of challenges in Dutch boardrooms. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 7(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2012.050041. [Google Scholar]
  70. Puławska, K., Dobija, D., Piotrowska, K., and Kravchenko, G. (2021). Audit Committee Formation: The Case of Poland1. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 29(2), 169–212, https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.50. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ramaswamy, K., and Li, M. (2001). Foreign investors, foreign directors and corporate diversification: an empirical examination of large manufacturing companies in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010620008101. [Google Scholar]
  72. Salehi, M., Sadatifar, Z. and Adibian, M.S. (2020). The impact of the characteristics and behaviors of the board of directors on agency costs in Iran. Contaduría y Administración, 66(1), 229, https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2021.2384. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sanders, W.G., and Carpenter, M.A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management journal, 41(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/257100. [Google Scholar]
  74. Shin, J.Y., Hyun, J.H., Oh, S., and Yang, H. (2018). The effects of politically connected outside directors on firm performance: Evidence from Korean chaebol firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12203. [Google Scholar]
  75. Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., and Urbanek, P. (2016). Corporate boards, large blockholders and executive compensation in banks: Evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 28, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.001. [Google Scholar]
  76. Soliman, M. and Ragab, A.A. (2013). Board of director's attributes and earning management: Evidence from Egypt. Proceedings of 6th International Business and Social Sciences Research Conference. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tapver, T. (2019). CSR reporting in banks: does the composition of the board of directors matter. Quant Financ Econ, 3(2), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2019.2.286. [Google Scholar]
  78. Van Veen, K., and Elbertsen, J. (2008). Governance regimes and nationality diversity in corporate boards: A comparative study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00698.x. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang, X., Feng, M., and Xu, X. (2019). Political connections of independent directors and firm internationalization: An empirical study of Chinese listed firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 58, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101205. [Google Scholar]
  80. Watson, W.E., Kumar, K., and Michaelsen, L.K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/256593. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wiersema, M.F., and Bantel, K.A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.5465/256474. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wintoki, M.B., Linck, J.S., and Netter, J.M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of financial economics, 105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  83. WSE, Best Practice for GPW Listed Companies 2016. Obtained from: https://www.gpw.pl/pub/GPW/o-nas/DPSN2016_EN.pdf (access: 25.04.2021). [Google Scholar]
  84. Yarbrough Jr, E., Abebe, M., and Dadanlar, H. (2017). Board political experience and firm internationalization strategy: A resource dependence perspective. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2016-0043. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zainal, D., Zulkifli, N., and Saleh, Z. (2013). Corporate board diversity in Malaysia: A longitudinal analysis of gender and nationality diversity. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(1), 136–148. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

International Experts’ Influence on Company Internationalization. (2021). International Experts’ Influence on Company Internationalization. Central European Management Journal, 29(4), 57-90. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.60 (Original work published 12/2021AD)

MLA style

“International Experts’ Influence On Company Internationalization”. 12/2021AD. Central European Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, 2021, pp. 57-90.

Chicago style

“International Experts’ Influence On Company Internationalization”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 29, no. 4 (2021): 57-90. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.60.