en pl
en pl

Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Show issue
Year 2006 
Volume 5 
Issue 1

The normalisation of 'excessive' workforce drug testing?

2006 5 (1) Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Abstract

In 'The normalization of 'sensible' recreational drug use' Parker, Williams and Aldridge (2002) present data on illegal drug use by adolescents and young adults in the UK. They argue that it is both widespread and largely socially benign - ie, normal. We contrast this 'normalisation' thesis with evidence of an increase in the introduction of drug policies - and drug testing - in British organisations. Such policies construct employee drug use as excessive enough to necessitate heightened management vigilance over workers, in order to preserve corporate interests. These contrasting representations of drug use inspire our discussion. We deploy the normal/ excessive couplet to unpick drug taking, to examine organisational drug policies and to comment upon emerging and potential resistance to these policies. Our contribution is to suggest that each of these activities can be understood as simultaneously normal and excessive, in an area where orthodox and critical analyses alike tend to be far more dualistic.

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Brewis, Joanna & Sanderson, Charlotte & Wray-Bliss, Edward (2006). The normalisation of 'excessive' workforce drug testing?. (2006). The normalisation of 'excessive' workforce drug testing?. Tamara: Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, 5(1), 39-53. (Original work published 2006)

MLA style

Brewis, Joanna and Sanderson, Charlotte and Wray-Bliss, Edward. “The Normalisation Of 'excessive' Workforce Drug Testing?”. 2006. Tamara: Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, vol. 5, no. 1, 2006, pp. 39-53.

Chicago style

Brewis, Joanna and Sanderson, Charlotte and Wray-Bliss, Edward. “The Normalisation Of 'excessive' Workforce Drug Testing?”. Tamara: Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 5, no. 1 (2006): 39-53.