en pl
en pl

Decyzje

Show issue
Year 12/2019 
Issue 32

Greed and Fear in Downstream R&D Games

Adam Karboowski
Warsaw School of Economics

12/2019 (32) Decyzje

DOI 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.131

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the fi rms’ incentives to engage in process R&D under vertical industrial setting, when the raising rivals’ cost effect is present. We show that R&D investment of the downstream duopoly fi rm raises the rival’s marginal costs of production. The downstream R&D behavior can give rise to the symmetric investment games, i.e., the prisoner’s dilemma, the deadlock game and the harmony game, between downstream competitors. If the costs of the R&D investments made by the downstream fi rms are large enough, the downstream fi rms can participate in the harmony game, which results in the investment hold-up or the creation of the R&D-avoiding cartel. For more R&D-effi cient downstream fi rms, the downstream investment game can end up in the prisoner’s dilemma or the deadlock game. In the prisoner’s dilemma, both downstream fi rms invest in R&D, but such a behavior is not Pareto optimal. In the prisoner’s dilemma, greed and fear make fi rms invest in R&D. In the deadlock game, both downstream fi rms invest in R&D, and such a behavior is Pareto optimal. The R&D investments are not induced by any social tension (greed or fear).

References

  1. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffi th, R., Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701–728. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amir, R., Halmenschlager, C., Jin, J. (2011a). R&D-induced industry polarization and shake-outs. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 386–398. [Google Scholar]
  3. Amir, R., Garcia, F., Halmenschlager, C., Pais, J. (2011b). R&D as a Prisoner’s Dilemma and R&Davoiding Cartels. The Manchester School, 79, 81–99. [Google Scholar]
  4. d’Aspremont, C., Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar]
  5. Atallah, G. (2002). Vertical R&D spillovers, cooperation, market structure, and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, 179–209. [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee, S., Lin, P. (2003). Downstream R&D, raising rivals’ costs, and input price contracts. [Google Scholar]
  7. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 79–96. [Google Scholar]
  8. Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V., Lokshin, B., Carree, M., & Sastre, J. (2018). The antecedents of new R&D collaborations with different partner types: On the dynamics of past R&D collaboration and innovative performance. Long Range Planning, 51, 285–302. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernes, H., Flo, I., Foros, O., Kind, H. (2019). Raising rivals’ costs or improving effi ciency? An exploratory study of managers’ views on backward integration in the grocery market. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 18, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brams, S. (1992). A generic negotiation game. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 4, 53–66. [Google Scholar]
  11. Burr, C., Knauff, M., Stepanova, A. (2013). On the prisoner’s dilemma in R&D with input spillovers and incentives for R&D cooperation. Mathematical Social Sciences, 66, 254–261. [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi, J., Yi, S. (2000). Vertical Foreclosure with the Choice of Input Specifi cations. RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 717–743. [Google Scholar]
  13. Coase, R. (1976). Adam Smith’s View of Man. The University of Chicago Selected Papers No. 50. [Google Scholar]
  14. Conti, C., Marini, M. (2019). Are you the right partner? R&D agreement as a screening device. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28, 243–264. [Google Scholar]
  15. Curtis Eaton, B. (2004). The elementary economics of social dilemmas. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 805–829. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dai, R., Zhang, J., Tang, W. (2017). Cartelization or Cost-sharing? Comparison of cooperation modes in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 159–173. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dasgupta, P. (1986). The Theory of Technological Competition. In: Stiglitz, J., Mathewson, G. (eds), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. International Economic Association Series, vol. 77, London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  18. DeCanio, S., Fremstad, A. (2013). Game theory and climate diplomacy. Ecological Economics, 85, 177–187. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dertwinkel-Kalt, M., Haucap, J., Wey, C. (2015). Raising rivals’ cost through buyer power. Economics Letters, 126, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  20. Farahani, M., Sheikhmohammady, M. (2014). A review on symmetric games: theory, comparison and applications. International Journal of Applied Operational Research, 4, 91–106. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ge, Z., Hu, Q., Xia, Y. (2014). Firms’ R&D Cooperation Behavior in a Supply Chain. Production and Operations Management, 23, 599–609. [Google Scholar]
  22. Geroski, P. (1992). Vertical relations between fi rms and industrial policy. Economic Journal, 102, 138–151. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hansel, M., Mutschler, M., Dickow, M. (2018). Taming cyber warfare: lessons from preventive arms control. Journal of Cyber Policy, 3, 44–60. [Google Scholar]
  24. Harabi, N. (2002). The impact of vertical R&D cooperation on fi rm innovation: An empirical investigation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, 93–108. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hortacsu, A., Syverson, C. (2007). Cementing relationships: Vertical integration, foreclosure, productivity, and prices. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 250–301. [Google Scholar]
  26. Inkmann, J. (2000). Horizontal and vertical R&D cooperation. Center of Finance and Econometrics at the University of Konstanz, discussion paper 02/2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ishii, A. (2004). Cooperative R&D between vertically related fi rms with spillovers. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1213–35. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jullien, B., Reisinger, M., Rey, P. (2018). Vertical foreclosure and multi-segment competition. Economics Letters, 169, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I. (1992). Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293–1306. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kamien, M., Zang, I. (2000). Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 995–1012. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karbowski, A. (2019). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in product innovation and fi rm performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20, 1121–1142. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lambertini, L., Rossini, G. (1998). Product homogeneity as a prisoner’s dilemma in a duopoly with R&D. Economics Letters, 58, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  33. Manasakis, C., Petrakis, E., Zikos, V. (2014). Downstream Research Joint Venture with Upstream Market Power. Southern Economic Journal, 80, 782–802. [Google Scholar]
  34. Marshall, G., Parra, A. (2019). Innovation and competition: The role of the product market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 65, 221–247. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ordover, J., Saloner, G., Salop, S. (1990). Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure. American Economic Review, 80, 127–142. [Google Scholar]
  36. Płatkowski, T. (2017). Greed and fear in multiperson social dilemmas. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 308, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rusch, H. (2019). The evolution of collaboration in symmetric 2x2 games with imperfect recognition of types. Games and Economic Behavior, 114, 118–127. [Google Scholar]
  38. Salinger, M. (1988). Vertical Mergers and Market Foreclosure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77, 345–356. [Google Scholar]
  39. Salop, S., Scheffman, D. (1983). Raising rivals’ costs. American Economic Review, 73, 267–271. [Google Scholar]
  40. Salop, S., Scheffman, D. (1987). Cost-raising strategies. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, 19–34. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sengupta, A. (2016). Investment secrecy and competitive R&D. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16, 1573–1583. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wakeley, J., Nowak, M. (2019). A two-player iterated survival game. Theoretical Population Biology, 125, 38–55. [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu, L., Liang, D., Duan, Z., Xiao, X. (2015). Stability Analysis of R&D Cooperation in a Supply Chain. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 409286. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Greed and Fear in Downstream R&D Games. (2019). Greed and Fear in Downstream R&D Games. Decyzje, (32), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.131 (Original work published 12/2019AD)

MLA style

“Greed And Fear In Downstream R&d Games”. 12/2019AD. Decyzje, no. 32, 2019, pp. 63-76.

Chicago style

“Greed And Fear In Downstream R&d Games”. Decyzje, Decyzje, no. 32 (2019): 63-76. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.131.