en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Show issue
Year 07.2020 
Volume 28 
Issue 2

Toward Most Valuable City Logistics Initiatives: Crowd Logistics Solutions’ Assessment Model

Jagienka Cieplińska
WSB University in Gdańsk
https://orcid.org/0000-0002- -8882-8472

Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz
WSB University in Gdańsk
https://orcid.org/0000- -0002-6183-6114

07.2020 28 (2) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.21

Abstract

Introduction: Crowd logistics is a widely accepted concept in times of the growing popularity of
sharing economy solutions. The popularity of e-commerce and a tendency to provide same-day
delivery are the main reasons for their development. Developing those trends requires new products
and services, now available on the market, known in the transport area as crowd logistics solutions.

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to provide a tool for assessing crowd-logistics solutions, taking
into consideration customers’ requirements. The text includes groups of environmental, economic,
and social criteria to facilitate the choice of the best crowd logistics solution for freight transport.

Methodology: The research is based on the critical analysis of different sources (literature, European
Commission reports, other reports and analyses) and practical solutions in the field of crowd logistics.
The main data analysis method is the Analytic Hierarchy Process, usually used to evaluate variants
in decision-making processes. This method was chosen because of the variety of data types (quantitative and qualitative) and formats, its popularity, universality, and replicability.

Results: This paper contains ready-to-use weights for the assessment of crowd logistics solutions.
The proposed set of criteria and weights can be a useful tool for customers to evaluate the sharing-
-economy services landscape in the areas they manage.

References

  1. Abdul-Rahman, H., Wang C., Wood, L.C. and Ebrahimi, M. (2016). Integrating and Ranking Sustainability Criteria for Housing. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, 169(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.15.00008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Afuah, A. and Tucci, C.L. (2013). Value Capture and Crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0423. [Google Scholar]
  3. Babbage, C. (1832). On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. Ldn.Knight. https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.975430.39088015716483. [Google Scholar]
  4. Buys, L., Barnett, K.R ., Miller, E. and Bailey, C. (2005). Smart housing and social sustainability: Learning from the residents of Queensland's Research House. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 31, 43–57. [Google Scholar]
  5. Botsman, R., (2013). The rise of sharing economy, https://www.economist.com/leaders/2013/03/09/the-rise-of-the-sharing-economy. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buldeo Rai, H., Verlinde, S., Merck, J. and Macharis, C. (2017). Crowd logistics: an opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport? European Transport Research Review , 9, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0256-6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Buldeo Rai, H., Verlinde, S.J. and Macharis, C. (2018). Shipping outside the box. Environmental impact and stakeholder analysis of a crowd logistics platform in Belgium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.210 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carbone, V., Rouquet, A. and Roussat, C. (2018). A typology of logistics at work in Collaborative consumption. International Journal of Phisical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(6), 379–396.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2017-0355. [Google Scholar]
  9. Carbone, V., Rouquet, A. and Roussat, C. (2017). The Rise of Crowd Logistics: A New Way to Co-Create Logistics Value. Journal of Business Logistics, 38(4), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12164. [Google Scholar]
  10. Carbone, V., Rouquet, A. and Roussat, C. (2016). Carried out by the crowd: what types of logistics characterise collaborative consumption, https://www.piggybee.com/upload/press/UniversiteitUtrecht.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheba, K. and Saniuk, S. (2016). Sustainable Urban Transport – The Concept of Measurement in the Field of City Logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 16, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.005. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, C., Cheng, S.F., Gunawan, A., Misra, A., Dasgupta, K., and Chander, D. (2014). TRACCS: Trajectory-Aware Coordinated Urban Crowd-Sourcing. Paper presented at the Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP-14), November 3–4, Pittsburgh. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dassen, T., Kunseler, E., Kessenich, L.M. (2013). The Sustainable City: An Analytical-Deliberative Approach to Assess Policy in the Context of Sustainable Urban Development" . Sustainable Development, 21(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1550. [Google Scholar]
  14. Devari, A., Nikolaev, A.G. and He, Q. (2017). Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers. Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review, 105, 105–122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. DHL Trend Research (2017). Sharing economy logistics: Rethinking logistics with access over ownership. DHL Trend Research. https://tinyurl.com/y7z6w628. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding, GKC. (2005). Developing a multicriteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance. Building Research & Information, 33(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000322618 [Google Scholar]
  17. Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., and Halevy, A.Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/1924421.1924442 [Google Scholar]
  18. Drexhage, J. and Murphy, D. (2010). Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012. New York: International Institute for Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckhardt, G.M. and Bardhi, F. (2015). The Sharing Economy Isn't About Sharing at All. Harvard Business Review, 28th January. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ekins, P. (2011). Environmental sustainability: From environmental valuation to the sustainability gap. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311423186. [Google Scholar]
  21. Finck, M. and Ranchordás, S. (2016). Sharing and the City. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 49, 1299–1369. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2741575. [Google Scholar]
  22. Frehe, V., Mehmann, J., and Teuteberg, F. (2017). Understanding and Assessing Crowd Logistics Business Models – Using Everyday People for Last Mile Delivery. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 32(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2015-0182. [Google Scholar]
  23. Frenken, K. and Schor, J. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003. [Google Scholar]
  24. Geron, T. (2013). Airnbn and unstoppable rise of the share economy. Forbes, 23 January. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Pronello, C. and Salanova Grau, J.M. (2018). Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Urban Transport: State-of-the-Art and Research Opportunities. Transport, 33, 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6810. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M. and Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552. [Google Scholar]
  27. Han, J. and Hayashi, Y. (2008). A system dynamics model of CO2 mitigation in China's intercity passenger transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 13(5), 298–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2008.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., O'Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244 [Google Scholar]
  29. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2006/06/ crowds/. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kafle, N.; Zou, B. and Lin, J. (2017). Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 99, 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.12.022. [Google Scholar]
  31. Keeble, B.R. (1988). The Brundtland Report: "Our Common Future”. Medicine and War, 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Z. and Hensher D.A. (2013). Crowding in Public Transport: A Review of Objective and Subjective Measures. Journal of Public Transportation, 16(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.2.6. [Google Scholar]
  33. Macharis, C. (2018). Shipping outside the box. Environmental impact and stakeholder analysis of a crowd logistics platform in Belgium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 806–816, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.210. [Google Scholar]
  34. Marcucci, E.; Le Pira, M.; Carrocci, C.S.; Gatta, V. and Pieralice, E. (2017). Connected shared mobility for passengers and freight: Investigating the potential of crowdshipping in urban areas. Proceedings of 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), Naples, Italy, 26–28 June 2017, 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2017.8005629. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mehmann, J., Frehe, V. and Teuteberg, F. (2015). Crowd logistics − a literature review and maturity model. Proceedings of the Hamburg international conference of logistics. Hamburg. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mladenow, A., Bauer, C., Strauss, C. (2016). Crowd logistics – the contribution of social crowd in logistics activities. International Journal of Web Information System, 12(3), 379–396. [Google Scholar]
  37. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-04-2016-0020. [Google Scholar]
  38. Moldan, B.; Janoušková, S. and Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033. [Google Scholar]
  39. Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002. [Google Scholar]
  40. Paloheimo, H.; Lettenmeier, M.; Waris, H. (2016). Transport reduction by crowdsourced deliveries-a library case 857 in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production,132, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.103. [Google Scholar]
  41. Poetz, M.K., Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x. [Google Scholar]
  42. Priester, R., Miramontes, M.and Wulfhorst, G. (2014). A Generic Code of Urban Mobility: How can Cities Drive Future Sustainable Development? Transportation Research Procedia, 4, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.008. [Google Scholar]
  43. Primentel, C. and Alvelos, F. (2018). Integrated urban freight logistics combining passenger and freight flows – mathematical proposal model. Transportation Research Procedia, 30, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.09.010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rougès, J.F.; Montreuil, B. (2014). Crowdsourcing delivery: New interconnected business models to reinvent delivery. Proceedings of 1st International Physical Internet Conference, Quebec City, Canada, 28–30 May 2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Saaty, R.W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process – what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sampaio, A.; Savelsbergh, M.; Veelenturf, L. and van Woensel, T. (2019). Crowd-Based City Logistics. Sustainable Transportation and Smart Logistics, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814242-4.00015-6. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sampaio, A., Savelsbergh, M., Veelenturf, L. and VanWoensel, T. (2017). Crowd-based City Logistics. SCL Report Series Crowd-based City Logistics. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schor, J.B. (2014). Debating the Sharing Economy Great Transition Initiative. Journal of Self -Governance & Management Economics, 4. [Google Scholar]
  49. Serafini, S.; Nigro, M.; Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E. (2018). Sustainable crowdshipping using public transport: A case study evaluation in Rome. Transportation Research Procedia, 30, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.09.012. [Google Scholar]
  50. United Nations (2014). World Urbanization Prospects. Economic and Social Affairs, https://www.compassion.com/multimedia/world-urbanization-prospects.pdf [Google Scholar]
  51. Un-Habitat (2013). Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857152 [Google Scholar]
  52. Valiantis, M. (2014). Sustainable urban transport. In: Sustainability behind Sustainability. Nova Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, Q., Shen, F. and Lee, L.H. (2016). Towards enhancing the last-mile delivery: An effective crowd-tasking model with scalable solutions. Transportation Research Part E, 93, 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.002. [Google Scholar]
  54. World Conservation Strategy – Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. (1980). International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natual Resources (IUCN). [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Toward Most Valuable City Logistics Initiatives: Crowd Logistics Solutions’ Assessment Model. (2020). Toward Most Valuable City Logistics Initiatives: Crowd Logistics Solutions’ Assessment Model. Central European Management Journal, 28(2), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.21 (Original work published 07.2020AD)

MLA style

“Toward Most Valuable City Logistics Initiatives: Crowd Logistics Solutions’ Assessment Model”. 07.2020AD. Central European Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, 2020, pp. 38-56.

Chicago style

“Toward Most Valuable City Logistics Initiatives: Crowd Logistics Solutions’ Assessment Model”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 28, no. 2 (2020): 38-56. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.21.