en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Show issue
Year 2018 
Volume 26 
Issue 1

Social value added (SVA) as an adaptation of economic valueadded (EVA) to the specifcity of cultural institutions

Paweł Wnuczak
Kozminski University

2018 26 (1) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.221


Purpose: The purpose of this article is to present the concept of social value added (SVA) as a tool for measuring the effectiveness of the activity of not-for-proft cultural institutions. Findings: The modifcations presented in this article make it possible to adapt economic value added (EVA) to the needs and specifcity of not-for-proft public cultural institutions. Applying a modifed EVA parameter, that is SVA, in cultural institutions may facilitate the process of management and the measurement of effective utilization of resources of these entities.

Methodology: A direct application of the measure of economic value added (EVA) in the case of evaluation of non-proft activity of cultural institutions would be impossible because of the specifcity of such organizations, which – as distinct from standard enterprises – are not oriented on generating fnancial gains. The article covers several successive modifcations of EVA, which lead eventually to the measure of social value added (SVA). This parameter represents the difference between the social impact of an evaluated institution and the social cost of capital involved in the conducted activity. A positive SVA means that the activity carried out by the institution subject to evaluation is socially viable. The method of SVA calculation presented in the article has been supported by a numerical example.

Originality/value: Published sources seldom tend to cover the tools improving management process or making it possible to measure the effects achieved by public cultural institutions. The solution discussed in this paper is a contribution to the body of reference literature in the said scope.


  1. Alwasiak, St., Lewandowska-Kalina, M., Kalina, L., Kowalewski, O., Możdżeń, M., and Rybiński, K. (2014). Interes publiczny a interesy grupowe w polskim ustawodawstwie. Ekonomista, 3: 349–365. [Google Scholar]
  2. Appleby, B. (1997). The new lingo of value added. Hospitals & Health Networks: 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ames, P.J. (1990). Breaking new grounds. Measuring museums’ merits. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9: 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  4. Analiza kosztów i korzyści projektów inwestycyjnych: Przewodnik (2003). European Commission, Directorate-General – Regional Policy. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, M. (1998). Estimating the value of the social benefits to visitors in a large art gallery. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 3(4): 230–252, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527259808722210 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartczak, A., Lindhjem, H. and Stenger, A. (2008). Review of Benefit Transfer studies in the forest context. Scandinavian Forest Economics, 42: 281–310. [Google Scholar]
  7. del Barrio, M.J., Herrero, L.C. and Sanz, J.Á. (2009). Measuring the efficiency of heritage institutions: A case study of a regional system of museums in Spain. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10: 258–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H. et al. (2001). Cost-benefit analysis. Concepts and practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  9. Braden, J.B. and Kolstad, C.D. (1991). Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. North Holland, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brooks, A.C. (2006). Efficient Nonprofits? Policy Studies Journal, 3(34): 303–312, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00174.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Bryan, J. et al. (2000). Assessing the role of the arts and cultural industries in a local economy. Environment and Planning A, 32: 1391–1408, https://doi.org/10.1068/a32168 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2001). Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? Application to the Valuation of the Environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41(2): 179–192, https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1138 [Google Scholar]
  13. Catalano, G., Genco, M., Pancotti, Ch., Sirtori, E., Vignetti, S., and Del Bo, Ch. (2014). Przewodnik po analizie kosztów i korzyści projektów inwestycyjnych. Narzędzie analizy ekonomicznej polityki spójności 2014–2020. European Commission, December. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cervone, H.F. (2010). Using cost benefit analysis to justify digital library projects. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 26(2): 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Shimin and Dodd, J.L. (1997). Economic Value Added (EVA’m): An Empirical Examination Of A New Corporate Performance Measure? Journal of Managerial Issues, IX: 318–333. [Google Scholar]
  16. Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J.L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cordeiro, J.J. Jr. and Kent, D.D. (2001). Do EVA adopters outperform their industry peers? Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. American Business Review, 19(2). [Google Scholar]
  18. Cwynar, A. and Cwynar, W. (2002). Zarządzanie wartością spółki kapitałowej. Warsaw: Fundacja Rozwoju Rachunkowości w Polsce. [Google Scholar]
  19. Czajkowski, M. (2010). Metoda wyboru warunkowego i wyceny warunkowej. In: M. Czajkowski, A. Kopańska, A. Markowska and T. Żylicz, Wartości nierynkowych korzyści z lasów. Metody wyceny oraz zastosowanie wyników w analizach ekonomicznych. Warszawa. [Google Scholar]
  20. DEAT (2004). Cost Benefit Analysis, Integrated Environmental Management, Information Series 8. Department of Environmental Affairs. [Google Scholar]
  21. Donovan, G.H. and Butry, D.T. (2010). Trees in the city: valuing street trees in Portland. Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(2): 77–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernand, M. (1994). Determinig the size of museum subsidies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18: 255–270, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079759 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernandez, P. (2002). EVA, Economic Profit and Cash Value Added Do Not Measure Shareholder Value Creation. Research Paper No 453.University of Navarra, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012253841-4.50032-9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fernandez, P. (2007). Valuing companies by cash flow discounting: Ten methods and nine theories. Managerial Finance, 33: 853–876, https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710823827 [Google Scholar]
  25. Florio, M. (2014). Applied Welfare Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Projects and Policies. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  26. Giergiczny, M., Kossakowska, A. and Śleszyński, J. (2014). Wycena ekonomiczna w projektowaniu rewitalizacji parku miejskiego. In: W. Zabierowski, D. Pieńkowski, and W. Steingrube (eds.), Społeczno-ekonomiczne uwarunkowania turystyki transgranicznej na obszarach przyrodniczo cennych. Greifswald-Szczecin: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilhespy, I. (1999). Measuring the Performance of Cultural Organizations: A Model. International Journal of Arts Management, 1(2): 38–52. [Google Scholar]
  28. Griffith, J.M. (2004). The true value of EVA. Journal of Applied Finance, Fall/Winter: 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hanley, N. and Spash, C.L. (1993). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hansen, T.B., Christoffersen, H. and Wanhill, S. (1998). The economic evaluation of cultural and heritage projects: conflicting methodologies. Tourism, Culture & Communication, 1: 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hausman, J.A. (1993). Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North-Holland, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(1993)220 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jackowicz, K., Mielcarz, P. and Wnuczak, P. (2017). Fair value, equity cash flow and project finance valuation: ambiguities and a solution. Managerial Finance, 43(8): 914–927. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kachniewska, M. (2016). Wymiana na rynku turystycznym jako narzędzie komercjalizacji i wyceny dóbr kulturowych. Turystyka Kulturowa, 4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koziol, Ch. (2014). A simple correction of the WACC discount rate for default risk and bankruptcy costs. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 42(4): 653–666, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-013-0356-x [Google Scholar]
  35. Kurek, B. (2009). Premia za ryzyko na rynku kapitałowym – kontrowersje metrologiczne. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 17(6): 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kushner, R. and Poole, P. (1996). Exploring Structure-Effectiveness Relationships in Nonprofit Arts Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2(7): 119–136, https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130070203 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ligus, M. (2010). Efektywność inwestycji w odnawialne źródła energii. Analiza kosztów i korzyści. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Fachowe CeDeWu. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lines, M. (1996). Dynamika i niepewność. In: Ekonomia środowiska i zasobów naturalnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krupski i S-ka. [Google Scholar]
  39. Matt, G. (2006). Muzeum jako przedsiębiorstwo. Łatwo i przystępnie o zarządzaniu instytucją kultury. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia. [Google Scholar]
  40. Markandya, A. and Pearce, D. (1988). Environmental considerations and the choice of the discount rate in developing countries. The World Bank, Environment Department Working Paper, UK. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mielcarz, P., and Wnuczak, P. (2011). DCF Fair Value Valuation, Excessive Assets and Hidden Inefficiencies. Contemporary Economics, 5(4): 44–57, https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.27 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future. [Google Scholar]
  43. Moorhouse, J.C. and Smith, M.S. (1994). The market for residential architecture: 19th century row house in Boston South End. Journal of Urban Economics, 35: 267–277, https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1994.1016 [Google Scholar]
  44. O’Byrne, S. (1997). EVA and shareholder return. Financial Practice and Education, Spring/Summer: 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  45. Palmer, J.P. (2002). Bread and circuses: The local benefits of sports and cultural businesses. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 161, Toronto. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pearce, D. and Turner, R. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. BPCC Wheatons LTD, Exert. [Google Scholar]
  47. Plaza, B. (2000). Evaluating the influence of a large cultural artifact in the attraction of tourism: the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao Case Study. Urban Affairs Review, 36(2): 264–274, https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870022184859 [Google Scholar]
  48. Portney, P.R. (1994). Contributions to a Symposium on Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4): 3–64, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Przewodnik do analizy kosztów i korzyści projektów inwestycyjnych. Fundusze strukturalne, Fundusz Spójności oraz Instrument Przedakcesyjny (2008). European Commission, Directorate-General – Regional Policy. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sójka, J., Poprawski, M., and Kieliszewski, P. (eds.) (2009). Instytucje upowszechniania kultury w XXI wieku. Przeżytek czy nowa jakość? Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe. [Google Scholar]
  51. Schuster, J.M. (1997). The Performance of Performance Indicators in the Arts. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(7): 253–269. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rae, G. (2016). Public Debt and Its Impact on the Polish Economy and Society. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 24(1): 89–112. [Google Scholar]
  53. Selwood, S. (ed.) (2001). The UK cultural sector: profile and policy issues. London: Policy Studies Institute. [Google Scholar]
  54. Słoński, T. (1999). Koncepcja wartości dodanej jako uniwersalna miara sukcesu firmy. Właściwości systemów motywacyjnych opartych na wartości dodanej. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, 823: 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  55. Spackman, M. (2007). Social discount rates for the European Union: an overview. In: M. Florio (ed.), Cost-Benefit Analysis and Incentives in Evaluation. The Structural Funds of the European Union, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  56. Stanziola, J. (2008). Developing a model to articulate the impact of museums and galleries: another dead duck in cultural policy research? Cultural Trends, 4(17), https://doi.org/10.1080/09548960802615455 [Google Scholar]
  57. Szymański, P. (2014). Ewolucja koncepcji zarządzania wartością przedsiębiorstwa – przegląd literatury. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 340: 167–180. [Google Scholar]
  58. Taalas, M. (1998). Efficiency of Finnish Museums – Free Disposal Hull Method to Measure Cost Efficiency, 10th International Conference of ACEI, Barcelona (Spain). [Google Scholar]
  59. The Green Book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government (2013). London: HM Treasury. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vaughan, D.R., Farr, H. and Slee, R.W. (2000). Estimating and interpreting the local economic benefits of visitor spending: an explanation. Leisure Studies, 19(2): 95–118, https://doi.org/10.1080/026143600374789 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wallace, J.S. (1997). Adopting residual income-based compensation plans: Do you get what you pay for? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(3): 275–300, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00009-3 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wallace, J.S. (1998). EVA financial systems: management perspectives. Advances in Management Accounting, 6: 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  63. Waltert F. and Schläpfer F. (2010). Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies. Ecological Economics, 70(2): 141–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.031 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wavell, C., Baxter, G., Johnson, I., and Williams, D. (2002). Impact evaluation of museums, archives and libraries: available evidence project, The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries. Aberdeen: The Robert Gordon University. [Google Scholar]
  65. Winpenny, J.T. (1995). Wartość środowiska. Metody wyceny ekonomicznej. Warszawa: PWE. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wnuczak, P. (2015). Zastosowanie strategicznej karty wyników oraz innych instrumentów implementacji strategii i pomiaru osiąganych rezultatów w polskich instytucjach kultury. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 1(166): 129–144. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wnuczak, P. (2014). Stosowanie narzędzi controllingu w polskich publicznych instytucjach kultury. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 79(135): 83–106, https://doi.org/10.5604/16414381.1133392 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wnuczak, P. (2011). Zastosowanie ekonomicznej wartości dodanej (EVA) w procesie optymalizacji struktury kapitału przedsiębiorstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 38: 505–516. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wnuczak, P. (2017). Controlling w instytucjach kultury. Warszawa: Poltext. [Google Scholar]

Full metadata record

Cite this record

APA style

Wnuczak, Paweł (2018). Wnuczak, P. . (2018). Social value added (SVA) as an adaptation of economic valueadded (EVA) to the specifcity of cultural institutions. Central European Management Journal, 26(1), 100-120. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.221 (Original work published 2018)

MLA style

Wnuczak, Paweł. Wnuczak, P. . “Social Value Added (Sva) As An Adaptation Of Economic Valueadded (Eva) To The Specifcity Of Cultural Institutions”. 2018. Central European Management Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2018, pp. 100-120.

Chicago style

Wnuczak, Paweł. Wnuczak, Paweł . “Social Value Added (Sva) As An Adaptation Of Economic Valueadded (Eva) To The Specifcity Of Cultural Institutions”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 26, no. 1 (2018): 100-120. doi:10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.221.