en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Tom 30 
Numer 3

Environment Characteristics and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights from a Polish and Finnish Sample

Adam Oleksiuk
Warsaw School of Economics

Agnieszka Pleśniak
Warsaw School of Economics

30 (3) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.86

Zawartość artykułu

Abstrakt

Purpose: The article presents research on enterprises from various economic environments, namely the mature Finnish market and the Polish post-transformation one. Thus, our study examined how the external (international) environment affected the internationalization and business opportunities of Polish and Finnish SMEs.

Methodology: Data for the Polish sub-sample was collected from January to February 2021 using the mixed CATI/CAWI method. We used multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) to check for measurement invariance, and chi-square independence test and logistic regression to verify the hypothesis.

Findings: Perceiving the environment as hostile hinders internationalization for Poland only and not for Finland. According to theoretical premises and earlier studies, entrepreneurial marketing orientation (EMO) increases the probability of internationalization in both countries. However, countries differ in terms of which EMO dimensions – and to what extent – influence internationalization.

Implications: In turbulent times, such as a pandemic, respondents might take the worst moment of turbulence as a reference point while assessing environmental hostility and appraising it as favorable. Perceiving the environment as hostile hinders internationalization in some sets only. In a mature economy, resources such as human capital, managerial experience, and access to finance may help to mitigate the negative influence of environmental hostility on internationalization. Respondents in both countries perceived the EMO dimensions in a similar way, so the EMO scale proved to be invariant and useful in a different country setting. Nevertheless, the EMO dimensions that are the main drivers of internationalization were country specific.

Originality: The article presents a study on the influence of environment characteristics on the internationalization of enterprises from various economic environments, i.e. the mature Finnish market and the Polish post-transition one. Thus, the article fills the literature gap regarding comparative studies of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) acting in different country sets.

Powiązania

  1. Agwu, M.E., & Onwuegbuzie, H.N. (2018). Effects of international marketing environments on entrepreneurship development. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0093-4 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alimadadi, S., Bengtson, A., & Hadjikhani, A. (2018). How does uncertainty impact opportunity development in internationalization? International Business Review, 27(1), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagozzi, R.P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baird, I.S., Lyles, M.A., & Orris, J.B. (1994). The choice of international strategies by small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(1), 48–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, Th., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Zwart, P.S. (1994). The impact of internal factors on the export success of Dutch small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(2), 69–83. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brouthers, K.D. (2002). Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491013 [Google Scholar]
  8. Buzavaite, M. & Korsakiene, R. (2019). Human Capital and the Internationalisation of SMEs: A Systemic Literature Review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070307 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chandra, A., Paul, J. & Chavan, M. (2020). Internationalization barriers of SMEs from developing countries: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1281–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2020-0167 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, J., Liu, L. & Wang, Y. (2021). Business model innovation and growth of manufacturing SMEs: a social exchange perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(2), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2020-0089 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chetty, S.K., & Stang, L.M. (2010). Internationalization and innovation in a network relationship context. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), 1725–1743. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011079855 [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpan, R. (1989). Export Behavior of Firms: Relevance of Firm Size. Journal of Business Research, 18, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(89)90045-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Daniels, J., Radebaugh, L., & Sullivan, D. (2007). International Business: environment and operations. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  14. Demir, R., Campopiano G., Kruckenhauser Ch., & Bauer F. (2021). Strategic agility, internationalisation speed and international success — The role of coordination mechanisms and growth modes. Journal of International Management, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100838 [Google Scholar]
  15. Diamantopoulos, A. & Inglis, K. (1988). Identifying Differences Between High- and Low- Involvement Exporters. International Marketing Review, 5(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008352 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dichtl, E., Köglmayr, H. G., & Müller, S. (1990). International Orientation as a Precondition for Export Success. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490325 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dimitratos, P. , Petrou, A., Plakoyiannaki, E. & Johnson, J.E. (2011). Strategic decision-making processes in internationalization: does national culture of the focal firm matter? Journal of World Business, 46(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dimitratos, P., Voudouris, I., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Nakos, G. (2012). International entrepreneurial culture – Toward a comprehensive opportunity-based operationalization of international entrepreneurship. International Business Review, 21, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. European Commission. (2021). Annual Report on European SMEs 2020/2021 Digitalisation of SMEs. SME Performance Review 2020/2021. Brussels, July. [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission. (2019). Annual Report on European SMEs 2018/2019. Research & Development and Innovation by SMEs. Luxemburg. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 [Google Scholar]
  22. Freeman, S., Deligonul, S., & Cavusgil, T. (2013). Strategic re-structuring by born-globals using outward and inward-oriented activity. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 156–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311314574 [Google Scholar]
  23. Freixaneta J., & Renart G. (2020). A capabilities perspective on the joint effects of internationalization time, speed, geographic scope and managers’ competencies on SME survival. Journal of World Business, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101110 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gabrielsson, P., Gabrielsson, M. & Seppälä, T. (2012). Marketing Strategies for Foreign Expansion of Companies Originating in Small and Open Economies: The Consequences of Strategic Fit and Performance. Journal of International Marketing, 20(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.11.0068 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gaganis Ch., Pasiouras F. & Voulgari F. (2018). Culture, business environment and SMEs' profitability: Evidence from European Countries. Economic Modelling, 78, May 2019, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.023 [Google Scholar]
  26. Głodowska, A., Maciejewski, M., & Wach, K. (2019). How Entrepreneurial Orientation Stimulates Different Types of Knowledge in the Internationalisation Process of Firms from Poland? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070104 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  29. Khandwalla, P.N. (1977). The Design of Organizations. Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kotabe, M., & Helsen, K. (2017). Global Marketing Management. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kowalik, I. (ed.) (2020). Entrepreneurial Marketing and International New Ventures. Antecedents, Elements and Outcomes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003034261 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liesch, P.W., Welch, L.S., & Buckley, P.J. (2011). Risk and uncertainty in internationalisation and international entrepreneurship studies. Management International Review, 51(6), 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0107-y [Google Scholar]
  33. Loayza, N.V, & Pennings, S. (2020). Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19: A Primer for Developing Countries. Research and Policy Briefs. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/33540 [Google Scholar]
  34. López-Duarte, C., & Vidal-Suárez, M.M. (2010). External uncertainty and entry mode choice: Cultural distance, political risk and language diversity. International Business Review, 19(6), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Love, J.H. & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: a review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614550190 [Google Scholar]
  36. McKibbin, W.J. & Fernando, R. (2020). The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios CAMA Working Paper, 19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3547729 [Google Scholar]
  37. Miesenböck, K.J. (1988). Small Business and Exporting: A Literature Review. International Small Business Journal, 6(2), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624268800600204 [Google Scholar]
  38. Morrison, E.R. & Saavedra, A.C. (2020). Bankruptcy’s Role in the COVID-19 Crisis. Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper, 624. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567127 [Google Scholar]
  39. Musso, F. & Francioni, B. (2014). International strategy for SMEs: criteria for foreign markets and entry modes selection. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(2), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2013-0149 [Google Scholar]
  40. Musso, F. & Francioni, B. (2013). The decision-making process in international business strategies: factors of influence on small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 2(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabe.2013040101 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nielsen, B.B. & Nielsen, S. (2011). The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: the choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  43. OECD. (2019). OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2021. [Google Scholar]
  44. Oleksiuk A., Pleśniak A., & Kowalik I. (2020). Impact of International Environment on the Entrepreneurial Marketing Orientation of Small and Medium Enterprises. 20th International Joint Conference: Central and Eastern Europe in the Changing Business Environment, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.18267/pr.2020.cer.2395.17 [Google Scholar]
  45. Oliveira, L., Bai, W., Johanson, M., Ratajczak-Mrozek, M., & Francioni, B. (2019). Uncertainty and Decision-Making in SME Internationalization: The Importance of Control, Prediction, and Knowledge, In International Business in a VUCA World: The Changing Role of States and Firms, Progress in International Business Research (pp. 337–359). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1745-886220190000014018 [Google Scholar]
  46. Oviatt, B.M. & McDougall, P.P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice , 29(5), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00097.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2020). An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schweizer, R. (2012). The internationalization process of SMEs: a muddling-through process. Journal of Business Research, 65(6), 745–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  50. Smallbone, D. & Welter, F. (2001). The role of government in SME development in transition economies. International Small Business Journal, 19(4), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242601194004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Solberg, C.A. (2008). Product complexity and cultural distance effects on managing international distributor relationships: A contingency approach. Journal of International Marketing, 16(3), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.16.3.57 [Google Scholar]
  52. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stephan, U., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: the role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.38 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tokic, D. (2020). Long-term consequences of the 2020 coronavirus pandemics: Historical global-macro context. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22448 [Google Scholar]
  55. Torkkeli, L., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S. & Kuivalainen, O. (2012). The effect of network competence and environmental hostility on the internationalization of SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-011-0083-0 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wach, K. (2021). The evolution of the Uppsala model: Towards non-linearity of internationalization of firms. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2021.0702.01 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wach, K. (2017). Exploring the Role of Ownership in International Entrepreneurship: How does Ownership Affect Internationalisation of Polish Firms? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050410 [Google Scholar]
  58. Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wnukowski, D. (2020). The Consequences of the Coronavirus Epidemic for the EU Economy. Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych. [Google Scholar]
  60. World Bank. (2020). Doing business 2020. Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW. Washington. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wolf, M. & Fornaro, L. (2020). Covid-19 Coronavirus and Macroeconomic Policy. CEPR Discussion Paper, DP14529. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yang, M., & Gabrielsson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial marketing of international high-tech business to-business new ventures: A decision-making process perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  63. Yu, X., Tao, Y., Tao, X., Xia, F., & Li, Y. (2018). Managing uncertainty in emerging economies: The interaction effects between causation and effectuation on firm performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Hessels, J. (2016). Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review, 6(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0065-1 [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Oleksiuk, Adam & Pleśniak, Agnieszka (2022). Environment Characteristics and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights from a Polish and Finnish Sample. (2022). Environment Characteristics and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights from a Polish and Finnish Sample. Central European Management Journal, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.86

MLA style

Oleksiuk, Adam and Pleśniak, Agnieszka. „Environment Characteristics And Internationalization Of Smes: Insights From A Polish And Finnish Sample”. Central European Management Journal, t. 30, nr 3, 2022.

Chicago style

Oleksiuk, Adam and Pleśniak, Agnieszka. „Environment Characteristics And Internationalization Of Smes: Insights From A Polish And Finnish Sample”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 30, nr 3 (2022). doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.86.

Prawa autorskie

copyright info

CC-BY

Podobne artykuły:

Brak podobnych.