en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 6/2021 
Tom 29 
Numer 2

How Firms Cooperate in Business Groups? Evidence from Poland

Wioletta Mierzejewska
Warsaw School of Economics

Patryk Dziurski
Warsaw School of Economics

6/2021 29 (2) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.46


Purpose: The study aims to identify the main directions of intragroup cooperation, along with crucial areas of cooperation in business groups, and develops theoretical models of cooperation in a business group.

Methodology: The qualitative approach is applied in the study that is based on the cross-case analysis of four business groups operating in Poland.

Findings: Results indicate that business groups cooperate mainly vertically (cooperation between the core company and affiliates) in operations. Horizontal (among affiliates) and vertical cooperation in other areas – marketing, R&D, finance, and human resources – are not so intense. The study enables us to propose a theoretical framework of cooperation models in business groups based on two dimensions – the direction of cooperation and the number of cooperation areas. It leads to the identification of four models: two-sided loose cooperation, two-sided tight cooperation, multi-sided loose cooperation, and multi-sided tight cooperation.

Implications: Identification of main directions of cooperation in business groups, along with areas of cooperation have implications for both researchers and managers. Findings of the study and the theoretical framework of cooperation models in business groups can be used as a basis for the further theoretical exploration of the organization and functioning of business groups in the economy and a strategic decision guideline for managers.

Originality: The literature focuses mainly on the interorganizational cooperation between dispersedly owned standalone entities. Studies on intraorganizational cooperation in business groups are limited. The study aims to provide a better understanding of cooperation between entities in business groups.


  1. Almeida, H., Chang, S.K. and Hwanki B.K. (2015). Internal Capital Markets in Business Groups: Evidence from the Asian Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 70(6), 2539–2586. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12309. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aluchna, M. (2010). Kierunki rozwoju polskich grup kapitałowych. Perspektywa międzynarodowa. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alves, F.S., Segatto, A.P. and De-Carli, E. (2016). Theoretical framework about relational capability on inter-organizational cooperation. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 1(04), 1650012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862216500123. [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2015). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. In: Knowledge, Networks and Power (pp. 393–420). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400292. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/258684. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolton, M.K., Malmrose, R. and Ouchi, W.G. (1994). The organization of innovation in the United States and Japan: Neoclassical and relational contracting. Journal of Management Studies, 31(5), 653–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00633.x. [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell, J.W. (2016). A collaboration-based model of work motivation and role ambiguity in public organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 655–675. [Google Scholar]
  9. Carr, J.B., Hawkins, C.V. and Westberg, D.E. (2017). An exploration of collaboration risk in joint ventures: perceptions of risk by local economic development officials. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(3), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0891242417710325. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cerrato, D. (2006). The multinational enterprise as an internal market system. International Business Review, 15(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.02.001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan, W.W. (2004). International cooperation in higher education: Theory and practice. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 32–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303254429. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, S.J. (2003). Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 238–253, https://doi.org/10.2307/30040617. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang, S.J. and Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429–448, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556403. [Google Scholar]
  14. Child, J., Faulkner, D. and Tallman, S.B. (2005). Cooperative strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chu, W. (2001). Contingency organizations and shared values: Multiple logics in managing diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010617323691. [Google Scholar]
  16. Colpan, A.M. and Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2018). Business groups as an organizational model. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Contractor, F.J. and Lorange, P. (2002). Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures. In: F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business. Joint ventures and technology partnership between firms. Oxford: Pergamon. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Business groups and their types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9012-5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ćwik, K. (2013). Aspekty organizacji sieciowej a funkcjonowanie grupy kapitałowej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie: kwartalnik naukowy, 4(24), 29–41. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cygler, J., Aluchna, M., Marciszewska, E., Witek-Hajduk, M. and Materna, G. (2012). Kooperencja przedsiębiorstw w dobie globalizacji. Wyzwania strategiczne, uwarunkowania prawne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwers Polska. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dmowska, J. and Mikucka-Kowalczyk, M.A. (2019). Podstawowe założenia teorii organizacji sieciowych a aspekty funkcjonowania Grupy Kapitałowej KGHM. Economy and Customs and Legal Relations. Edition 9–10, February–April. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dyduch, W. (2019). Entrepreneurial Strategy Stimulating Value Creation: Conceptual Findings and Some Empirical Tests. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070304. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dyer, J.H. (1996). Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organization Science, 7(6), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.649. [Google Scholar]
  24. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferraris, A., Bogers, M., Bresciani, S. (2020). Subsidiary innovation performance: Balancing external knowledge sources and internal embeddedness. Journal of International Management, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100794. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gammelgaard, J., McDonald, F., Stephan, A., Tüselmann, H. and Dörrenbächer, C. (2012). The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance. International Business Review, 21(6), 1158–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.01.001. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gaur, A.S., Ma, H. and Ge, B. (2019). MNC strategy, knowledge transfer context, and knowledge flow in MNEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1885–1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0476. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gerlach, M.L. (1992). Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business. Oakland: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Giroud, A., Ha, Y.J. and Yamin, M. (2014). Foreign subsidiaries’ internal and external R&D cooperation in South Korea: Explanatory factors and interaction. Asian Business & Management, 13(3), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2014.8. [Google Scholar]
  30. Głodowska, A., Maciejewski, M., & Wach, K. (2019). How Entrepreneurial Orientation Stimulates Different Types of Knowledge in the Internationalisation Process of Firms from Poland?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070104. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gnyawali, D., Singal, M. and Mu, S. (2009). Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: A-multi-level conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 15, 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.02.003. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gopalan, R., Nanda, V. and Seru, A. (2007). Affiliated firms and financial support: Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 759–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.008. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gopalan, R., Nanda, V. and Seru, A. (2014). Internal capital market and dividend policies: Evidence from business groups. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(4), 1102–1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu004. [Google Scholar]
  34. Govindarajan, V. and Gupta, A.K. (2001). The quest for global dominance: Transforming global presence into global competitive advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (1986). Resource sharing among SBUs: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.2307/255940. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gurkov, I. (2015). Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of Western multinational corporations: Support from parents and cooperation with sister-subsidiaries. Journal of East-West Business, 21(3), 157–181, https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2015.1042619. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gurkov, I. (2016). Human resource management in Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Post-Communist Economies, 28(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1182735. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hassett, M.E. and Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (eds.). (2013). Handbook of longitudinal research methods in organisation and business studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ho, M.H.W., and Wang, F. (2015). Unpacking knowledge transfer and learning paradoxes in international strategic alliances: Contextual differences matter. International Business Review, 24(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.08.002. [Google Scholar]
  40. Holmes, R.M., Hoskisson, R.E., Kim, H., Wan, W.P. and Holcomb, T.R. (2015). Business groups research: A comprehensive review, theoretical framework, and future research agenda. Conference article in: Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, August 2015. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hsieh, T.J., Yeh, R.S. and Chen, Y.J. (2010). Business group characteristics and affiliated firm innovation: The case of Taiwan. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ishihara, H. and Zolkiewski, J. (2017). Effective knowledge transfer between the headquarters and a subsidiary in a MNC: the need for heeding capacity. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2015-0109. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jasiński, B. (2012). Sieci holdingowe. In: J. Niemczyk, E. Stańczyk-Hugiet, B. Jasiński (eds.), Sieci międzyorganizacyjne. Współczesne wyzwanie dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania. Warszawa: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jeong, G.Y., Chae, M.S. and Park, B.I. (2017). Reverse knowledge transfer from subsidiaries to multinational companies: Focusing on factors affecting market knowledge transfer. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 34(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1366. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jia, N., Shi, J. and Wang, Y. (2013). Coinsurance within business groups: Evidence from related party transactions in an emerging market. Management Science, 59(10), 2295–2313. [Google Scholar]
  46. Karbowski, A., and Prokop, J. (2019). The Impact of Vertical R&D Cooperation on Market Performance of Firms. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(4), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070405. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kaszowska-Mojsa, J. (2020). Innovation strategies of manufacturing companies during expansions and slowdowns. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080403. [Google Scholar]
  48. Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–43. [Google Scholar]
  49. Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J.W. (2006). Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organization science, 17(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0188. [Google Scholar]
  50. Khanna, T., (2000). Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: existing evidence and unanswered questions. European Economic Review, 44(4–6), 48–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00059-8. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R.E. and Wan, W.P. (2004). Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.395. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim, Y.C., Shin, T. and Park, S. (2019). Enhancing firm performance through intra-group managerial experience: Evidence from group-affiliated firms in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09671-3. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/259084. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kremez, Z., Frazer, L., Quach, S. and Thaichon, P. (2020). Collaboration, communication, support, and relationships in the context of e-commerce within the franchising sector. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2020.1733051. [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, Ch. (2014). Patterns of R&D Configuration and Evolution in MNCs. DRUID Academy Conference in Rebild, Aalborg, Denmark on January 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, D., Ferreira, M.P. and Serra, F.R. (2009). Technology transfer within MNEs: Inter-subsidiary competition and cooperation. RAI-Revista de Administração e Inovação, 6(1), 139–158. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, L. (2005). The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra-and inter-organizational relationships. International Business Review, 14(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.12.005. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lowensberg, D.A. (2010). A "new" view on "traditional" strategic alliances' formation paradigms. Management Decision, 48(7), 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011068798. [Google Scholar]
  59. Luo, Y. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.261. [Google Scholar]
  60. Luo, Y. (2003). Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent-subsidiary links shape overseas success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 290–309. [Google Scholar]
  61. Luo, Y. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: a perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2004.10.006. [Google Scholar]
  62. Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.007. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mahmood, I. P., Zhu, H. and Zaheer, A. (2017). Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1082–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2542. [Google Scholar]
  64. Martin, K. (2018). Poland upgraded to developed market status by FTSE Russell. Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/0e4eabc2-bfd1-11e8-8d55-54197280d3f7 (accessed 25 September 2019). [Google Scholar]
  65. Martinez, J. and Jarillo, J. (1989). The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20, 489–514, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490370. [Google Scholar]
  66. McDonnell, J., Beatson, A. and Huang, C.H. (2011). Investigating relationships between relationship quality, customer loyalty and cooperation: An empirical study of convenience stores' franchise chain systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(3), 367–385, https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851111143268 [Google Scholar]
  67. Monteiro, L.F., Arvidsson, N. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1), 90–107. [Google Scholar]
  68. Morck, R., Yavuz, M.D. and Yeung, B. (2011). Banking system control, capital allocation, and economy performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(2), 264–283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.12.004. [Google Scholar]
  69. Najib, M. and Kiminami, A. (2011). Innovation, cooperation and business performance. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1(1), 75–96. [Google Scholar]
  70. Nogalski, B. And Kreft, Z. (2002). Współdziałanie przedsiębiorstw w grupie kapitałowej. In: M. Romanowska and M. Trocki (eds.), Przedsiębiorstwo partnerskie. Warsaw: Difin. [Google Scholar]
  71. Park, S.R. and Yuhn, K.H. (2012). Has the Korean chaebol model succeeded? Journal of Economic Studies, 39(2), 260–274. [Google Scholar]
  72. Perotti, E.C. and Gelfer, S. (2001). Red barons or robber barons? Governance and investment in Russian financial–industrial groups. European Economic Review, 45(9), 1601–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00097-0. [Google Scholar]
  73. Pouwels, I. and Koster, F. (2017). Inter-organizational cooperation and organizational innovativeness. A comparative study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9, 184–204, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-01-2017-0003. [Google Scholar]
  74. Powell, W.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and economic life. In: N.J. Smelser and R. Swedberg, The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  75. Romanowska, M. and Mierzejewska, W. (2015). Wewnętrzny rynek grupy kapitałowej jako substytut sieci biznesowych. Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości, 32, 333–344. [Google Scholar]
  76. Schröder, C. (2014). Dynamics in ICT cooperation networks in selected German ICT clusters. International Economics and Economic Policy, 11(1–2), 197–230. [Google Scholar]
  77. Seo, E., Kang, H. and Song, J. (2020). Blending talents for innovation: Team composition for cross-border R&D collaboration within multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 851–885, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00331-z. [Google Scholar]
  78. Serrat, O. (2017). Learning in strategic alliances. In Knowledge solutions (pp. 639–647). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sheffi, Y., Saenz, M. J., Rivera, L. and Gligor, D. (2019). New forms of partnership: the role of logistics clusters in facilitating horizontal collaboration mechanisms. European Planning Studies, 27(5), 905–931, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1575797. [Google Scholar]
  80. Shijaku, E., Larraza-Kintana, M. and Urtasun-Alonso, A. (2020). Network centrality and organizational aspirations: A behavioral interaction in the context of international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 813–828, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0166-4. [Google Scholar]
  81. Singh, N. and Salwan, P. (2015). Contribution of Parent Company in Growth of its Subsidiary in Emerging Markets: Case Study of Maruti Suzuki. Journal of Applied Business & Economics, 17(1). [Google Scholar]
  82. Teixeira, S. and Leite, E. (2019). Networks and Interorganizational Cooperation in Nature Tourism: A Case Study. Revista de turism – studii si cercetari in turism, 27. [Google Scholar]
  83. Terry, A. and Di Lernia, C. (2013). Quasi-franchising: a new model for strategic business cooperation. In Th. Ehrmann, J. Windsperger, G. Cliquet, G. Hendrikse, Network Governance. Alliances, Cooperatives and Franchise Chains. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  84. Todeva, E. and Knoke, D. (2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management Decision, 43(1), 123–148. [Google Scholar]
  85. Trocki, M. (1998). Zarządzanie grupą kapitałową. In: M. Romanowska, M. Trocki, B. Wawrzyniak (eds.), Grupy kapitałowe w Polsce. Warsaw: Difin. [Google Scholar]
  86. Trocki, M. (2004). Grupy kapitałowe. Tworzenie i funkcjonowanie. Warsaw: PWN. [Google Scholar]
  87. Welch, C., Plakoyiannaki, E., Piekkari, R. and Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2013). Legitimizing diverse uses for qualitative research: A rhetorical analysis of two management journals. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12001. [Google Scholar]
  88. Yeniyurt, S.,and Carnovale, S. (2017). Global supply network embeddedness and power: An analysis of international joint venture formations. International Business Review, 26(2). 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12001. [Google Scholar]
  89. Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  90. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  91. Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D. and Hoskisson, R. E. (2007). Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1551–1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00735.x. [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Mierzejewska, Wioletta & Dziurski, Patryk (2021). How Firms Cooperate in Business Groups? Evidence from Poland. (2021). How Firms Cooperate in Business Groups? Evidence from Poland. Central European Management Journal, 29(2), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.46 (Original work published 6/2021n.e.)

MLA style

Mierzejewska, Wioletta and Dziurski, Patryk. „How Firms Cooperate In Business Groups? Evidence From Poland”. 6/2021n.e. Central European Management Journal, t. 29, nr 2, 2021, ss. 63-88.

Chicago style

Mierzejewska, Wioletta and Dziurski, Patryk. „How Firms Cooperate In Business Groups? Evidence From Poland”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 29, nr 2 (2021): 63-88. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.46.