en pl
en pl

Decyzje

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 6/2015 
Numer 23

Procesy decyzyjne w sprawie wniosków o azyl w Europie: charakterystyka uchodźcy oraz analiza empiryczna wyników przyznawania azylu

Patricia Rodda
University of California

6/2015 (23) Decyzje

DOI 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.45

Zawartość artykułu

Abstrakt

Chociaż uchodźcy otrzymują ofertę ochrony azylowej na podstawie Konwencji dotyczącej statusu uchodźców z 1951 roku (Konwencja genewska), wiele państw stara się ograniczyć liczbę wniosków o azyl otrzymywanych każdego roku. Niektórzy badacze sądzą, że nawet bez tych środków odstraszania, niektórzy uchodźcy mają mniejszą szansę na pozytywną decyzję o przyznaniu azylu niż inni. W niniejszej pracy, na podstawie danych z 32 państw europejskich, przeanalizowano wpływ różnych cech – w tym płci, wieku, pochodzenia
i kraju pochodzenia – na prawdopodobieństwo przyznania azylu. To badanie jest pierwszą próbą empirycznego przetestowania niepotwierdzonej w literaturze
stronniczości w procesach decyzyjnych odnośnie do przyznawania azylu.

Powiązania

  1. Akram, S. M. (2000). Orientalism Revisited in Asylum and Refugee Claims. International Journal of Refugee Law, 12(1), 7-40. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alison, M. (2007). Wartime Sexual Violence: Women’s Human Rights and Questions of Masculinity. Review of International Studies, 33(1), 75-90. [Google Scholar]
  3. Angel, J. L., Angel, R. J. (1992). Age at Migration, Social Connections, and Well-Being Among Elderly Hispanics. Journal of Aging and Health, 4(4), 480-499. [Google Scholar]
  4. Angel, R. J. et. al. (1999). Age at Migration and Family Dependency Among Older Mexican Immigrants: Recent Evidence from the Mexican American EPESE. The Gerontologist, 39(1), 59-65. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ankenbrand, B. (2002). Refugee Women Under German Asylum Law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 14(1), 45-56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Anker, D. (2000-2001). Refugee States and Violence Against Women in the ‘Domestic’ Sphere: The Non-State Actor Question. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15, 391-402. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anker, D., Gilbert, N., Kelly, L. (1997). Women Whose Governments Are Unable or Unwilling to Provide Reasonable Protection from Domestic Violence May Qualify As Refugees Under United States Asylum Law. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 11, 709-745. [Google Scholar]
  8. Asylum Information Database. (2015). Country Reports. . [Google Scholar]
  9. Bahl, A. 1997-1998. Home is Where the Brute Lives: Asylum Law and Gender Based Claims of Persecution. Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 4, 33-73. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell, D. N. F., Blanchfl ower, D. G. (2011). Young People and the Great Recession. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(2), 241-267. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhabha, J. (2004a). Demography and Rights: Women Children and Access to Asylum. International Journal of Refugee Law, 16(2), 227-243. [Google Scholar]
  12. -----. (2004b). Seeking Asylum Alone: Treatment of Separated and Traffi cked Children in Need of Refugee Protection. International Migration, 42(1), 141-148. [Google Scholar]
  13. Batchelor, C. A. (1995). Stateless Persons: Some Gaps in International Protection. International Journal of Refugee Law, 7(2), 232-259. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bloch, A., Galvin, T., Harrell-Bond, B. (2000). Refugee Women in Europe: Some Aspects of the Legal and Policy Dimensions. International Migration, 38(2),169-190. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bocker, A., Havinga, T. (1998). Asylum Applications in the European Union: Patterns and Trends and the Effects of Policy Measures. Journal of Refugee Studies, 11(3), 245-266. [Google Scholar]
  16. Boswell, Ch. (2007). Migration Control in Europe After 9/11: Explaining the Absence of Securitization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 589-610. [Google Scholar]
  17. Carpenter, R. Ch. (2005). ‘Women, Children and Other Vulnerable Groups’: Gender, Strategic Frames and the Protection of Civilians as a Transnational Issue. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 295-334. [Google Scholar]
  18. Castles, S., Loughma, S. (2003). Trends in Asylum Migration to Industrialized Countries: 19992001. Discussion Paper 2003/31. United Nations University: World Institute for Development Economics Research. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cervany, J., van Ours, J. C. (2013). Unemployment of Non-Western Immigrants in the Great Recession. De Economist, 161(4), 463-480. [Google Scholar]
  20. Christie, A. (2003). Unsettling the ‘Social’ in Social Work: Responses to Asylum Seeking Children in Ireland. Child & Family Social Work, 8(3), 223-231. [Google Scholar]
  21. Correlates of War. (2014). World Religion Data (v1.1). < http://www.correlatesofwar.org>. [Google Scholar]
  22. Crawley, H. (2000). Engendering the State in Refugee Women’s Claims for Asylum. In Jacobs, S., Jacobson, R., Marchbank, J. (eds.) States of Confl ict: Gender, Violence, and Resistance. London: Zed Books, 87-104. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dunkerley, D., et al. (2005). The Experiences of Frontline Staff Working with Children Seeking Asylum. Social Policy & Administration, 39(6), 640-652. [Google Scholar]
  24. European Commission. (2014). Statistics. Eurostat < http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/ portal/statistics/themes>. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fekete, L. (2005). The Deportation Machine: Europe, Asylum, and Human Rights. Race & Class, 47(1), 64-91. [Google Scholar]
  26. Freedom House. (2014). Freedom in the World: Country Ratings and Status. . [Google Scholar]
  27. Gibney, M. L., Wood, C. R., Haschke, P. (2014). Political Terror Scale 1976-2012. . [Google Scholar]
  28. Gomez, D. (2003-2004). Last in Line – the United States Trails Behind in Recognizing Gender-Based Asylum Claims. Whittier Law Review, 25, 959-987. [Google Scholar]
  29. Goodman, R., Jinks, D. (2003). Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties. European Journal of International Law, 14(1), 171-183. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hathaway, O. A. (2007). Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 51(4), 588-621. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hatton, T. (2012). The Recession and International Migration. In Baldwin, R., Vines, D. (eds.) Rethinking Global Economic Governance in Light of the Crisis: New Perspectives on Economic Policy Foundations. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 143-156. [Google Scholar]
  32. -----. (2004). Seeking Asylum in Europe. Economic Policy, 19(38) 5-62. [Google Scholar]
  33. Heyman, M. G. (2005). Domestic Violence and Asylum: Toward a Working Model of Affi rmative State Obligations. International Journal of Refugee Law, 17(4), 729-748. [Google Scholar]
  34. -----. (2002-2003). Asylum, Social Group Membership and the Non-State Actor: the Challenge of Domestic Violence. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 36(4), 767-814. [Google Scholar]
  35. Holzer, T., Schneider, G. (2001). Asylpolitik auf Abwegen – Nationalstaatliche und Europaische Reaktionen auf die Globalizierung der Fluchtlingsstrome. Opladen, Germany: Leske und Budrich. [Google Scholar]
  36. Holzer, T., Schneider, G., Widmer, T. (2000). The Impact of Legislative Deterrence Measures on the Number of Asylum Applications in Switzerland (1986-1995). International Migration Review, 34(4), 1182-1216. [Google Scholar]
  37. Keith, L. C., Holmes, J. (2009). A Rare Examination of Typically Unobservable Factors in US Asylum Decisions. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(2) 224-241. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kelly, N. (1993). Gender-Related Persecution: Assessing the Asylum Claims of Women. Cornell International Law Journal, 26, 625-674. [Google Scholar]
  39. Martin, L. L. (2005). The President and International Commitments: Treaties as Signaling Devices. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(3), 440-465. [Google Scholar]
  40. Musalo, K. (2002-2003). Revisiting Social Group and Nexus in Gender Asylum Claims: A Unifying Rationale for Evolving Jurisprudence. DePaul Law Review, 52, 777-808. [Google Scholar]
  41. Neumayer, E. (2005a). Asylum Recognition Rates in Western Europe: Their Determinants, Variation, and Lack of Convergence. Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 49(1), 43-66. [Google Scholar]
  42. -----. (2005b). Bogus Refugees? The Determinants of Asylum Migration to Western Europe. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 389-409. [Google Scholar]
  43. -----. (2005c). Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 49(6), 925-953. [Google Scholar]
  44. Polk, M. F. (1997-1998). Women Persecuted Under Islamic Law: The Zina Ordinance in Pakistan as a Basis for Asylum Claims in the United States. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 12, 379-393. [Google Scholar]
  45. Randall, M. (2002). Refugee Law and State Accountability for Violence Against Women: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Approaches to Recognizing Asylum Claims Based on Gender Persecution. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 25, 281-318. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sandefur, G. D., Scott, W. J. (1981). A Dynamic Analysis of Migration: An Assessment of the Effects of Age, Family, and Career Variables. Demography, 18(3), 355-368. [Google Scholar]
  47. Seith, P. A. (1997). Escaping Domestic Violence: Asylum as a Means of Protection for Battered Women. Columbia Law Review, 97(6), 1804-1843. [Google Scholar]
  48. Settlage, R. (1997-1998). No Place to Call Home: Stateless Vietnamese Asylum-Seekers in Hong [Google Scholar]
  49. Kong. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 12, 187-202. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sinha, A. (2001). Domestic Violence and U.S. Asylum Law: Eliminating the ‘Cultural Hook’ for Claims Involving Gender-Related Persecution. New York University Law Review, 76, 1562-1598. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sivakumaran, S. (2007). Sexual Violence Against Men in Armed Confl ict. The European Journal of International Law, 18(2), 253-276. [Google Scholar]
  52. Stellinga-Boelen, A. A. M., et al. (2007). Vitamin D Levels in Children of Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands in Relation to Season and Dietary Intake. European Journal of Pediatrics, 166(3), 201-206. [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor, S., Byford, S. (2003). Research with Unaccompanied Children Seeking Asylum. BMJ, 327, 1400-1402. [Google Scholar]
  54. UNHCR. (2014a). Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. . [Google Scholar]
  55. -----. (2014b). States Parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol. < http://www.unhcr.org/3b73b0d63.html>. [Google Scholar]
  56. -----. (2009). Chapter IV: Asylum and Refugee Status Determination. UNHCR Statistical Yearbook. . [Google Scholar]
  57. Vincent, J. (1996). Who’s Afraid of an Aging Population? Nationalism, the Free Market, and the Construction of Old Age as an Issue. Critical Social Policy, 47(16), 3-26. [Google Scholar]
  58. World Bank. (2014a). GDP (Current US). Indicators. < http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD>. [Google Scholar]
  59. World Bank. (2014b). Unemployment, Total (% of Total Labor Force) (Modeled ILO Estimate). Indicators. < http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS>. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zawati, H. (2007). Impunity or Immunity: Wartime Male Rape and Sexual Torture as a Crime Against Humanity. Torture, 17(1), 27-47. [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Rodda, Patricia C. (2015). Procesy decyzyjne w sprawie wniosków o azyl w Europie: charakterystyka uchodźcy oraz analiza empiryczna wyników przyznawania azylu. (2015). Procesy decyzyjne w sprawie wniosków o azyl w Europie: charakterystyka uchodźcy oraz analiza empiryczna wyników przyznawania azylu. Decyzje, (23), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.45 (Original work published 6/2015n.e.)

MLA style

Rodda, Patricia C.. „Procesy Decyzyjne W Sprawie Wniosków O Azyl W Europie: Charakterystyka Uchodźcy Oraz Analiza Empiryczna Wyników Przyznawania Azylu”. 6/2015n.e. Decyzje, nr 23, 2015, ss. 23-46.

Chicago style

Rodda, Patricia C.. „Procesy Decyzyjne W Sprawie Wniosków O Azyl W Europie: Charakterystyka Uchodźcy Oraz Analiza Empiryczna Wyników Przyznawania Azylu”. Decyzje, Decyzje, nr 23 (2015): 23-46. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.45.

Prawa autorskie

copyright info

CC-BY

Podobne artykuły: