Pewne problemy z oceną racjonalności

Swistak, Piotr

Abstrakt

Różnica między predykcjami wynikającymi z teorii gier a rzeczywistymi wyborami dokonywanymi przez uczestników eksperymentów jest nadinterpretowana jako dowód na nieracjonalność graczy. W pracy rozważam pewną wersję gry ultimatum i badam jej równowagi przy różnych założeniach o preferencjach uczestników. Korzystając ze standardowego pojęcia racjonalności wykazuję, że rozbieżność między wynikiem „normatywnym” i „deskryptywnym” nie może być ustalana poprzez proste porównanie punktów równowagi gry z rzeczywistymi wyborami dokonywanymi przez ludzi.

Słowa kluczowe

teoria gier (8)behawioralna teoria gier (2)gra ultimatum (2)racjonalność (4)

Powiązania

Andersen, S., Ertaç, S., Gneezy, U., Hoffman, M., List, J. A. (2011). Stakes matter in ultimatum games. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3427-3439. [Google Scholar]
Camerer, F. C. (2011). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
Camerer, C., Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209-219. [Google Scholar]
Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1), 47-59. [Google Scholar]
Davis, D. D., Holt, Ch. A. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367-388. [Google Scholar]
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. A., Smith, V. L. (1998). Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: Experimental economics and evolutionary psychology. Economic Inquiry, 36(3), 335-352. [Google Scholar]
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346-380. [Google Scholar]
Kaminski, M., Lissowski, G., Swistak, P. (2013). Formal theory and value judgments. Polish Sociological Review, 4(184), 409-429. [Google Scholar]
Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Sadoff, S. E. (2011). Checkmate: Exploring backward induction among chess players. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 975-90. [Google Scholar]
McKelvey, R. D., Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 6-38. [Google Scholar]
Mironova, V., Whitt, S. (2013). International peacekeeping, and positive peace: Experimental and survey evidence from Kosovo. Available at SSRN 2243770, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Palacios-Huerta, I., Volij, O. (2009). Field centipedes. The American Economic Review, 99(4), 1619-35. [Google Scholar]
Slonim, R., Roth, A. E. (1998). Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica, 66(3), 569-596. [Google Scholar]
Wason, P. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273-281. [Google Scholar]
Weibull, J. (2004). Testing Game Theory. In: Advances in Understanding Strategic Behaviour: Game Theory, Experiments and Bounded Rationality (pp. 85-104). Essay in Honour of Werner Güth, by Steffen Huck. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Swistak, Piotr (2015). Pewne problemy z oceną racjonalności. (2015). Pewne problemy z oceną racjonalności. Decyzje, (23), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.44 (Original work published 6/2015n.e.)

MLA style

Swistak, Piotr. „Pewne Problemy Z Oceną Racjonalności”. 6/2015n.e. Decyzje, nr 23, 2015, ss. 5-22.

Chicago style

Swistak, Piotr. „Pewne Problemy Z Oceną Racjonalności”. Decyzje, Decyzje, nr 23 (2015): 5-22. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.44.

Prawa autorskie

CC-BY

[1] Andersen, S., Ertaç, S., Gneezy, U., Hoffman, M., List, J. A. (2011). Stakes matter in ultimatum games. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3427-3439. [Google Scholar]

[2] Camerer, F. C. (2011). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]

[3] Camerer, C., Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209-219. [Google Scholar]

[4] Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1), 47-59. [Google Scholar]

[5] Davis, D. D., Holt, Ch. A. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]

[6] Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367-388. [Google Scholar]

[7] Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. A., Smith, V. L. (1998). Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: Experimental economics and evolutionary psychology. Economic Inquiry, 36(3), 335-352. [Google Scholar]

[8] Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346-380. [Google Scholar]

[9] Kaminski, M., Lissowski, G., Swistak, P. (2013). Formal theory and value judgments. Polish Sociological Review, 4(184), 409-429. [Google Scholar]

[10] Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Sadoff, S. E. (2011). Checkmate: Exploring backward induction among chess players. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 975-90. [Google Scholar]

[11] McKelvey, R. D., Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 6-38. [Google Scholar]

[12] Mironova, V., Whitt, S. (2013). International peacekeeping, and positive peace: Experimental and survey evidence from Kosovo. Available at SSRN 2243770, 2013. [Google Scholar]

[13] Palacios-Huerta, I., Volij, O. (2009). Field centipedes. The American Economic Review, 99(4), 1619-35. [Google Scholar]

[14] Slonim, R., Roth, A. E. (1998). Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica, 66(3), 569-596. [Google Scholar]

[15] Wason, P. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273-281. [Google Scholar]

[16] Weibull, J. (2004). Testing Game Theory. In: Advances in Understanding Strategic Behaviour: Game Theory, Experiments and Bounded Rationality (pp. 85-104). Essay in Honour of Werner Güth, by Steffen Huck. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. [Google Scholar]

Decyzje