en pl
en pl

Decyzje

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 8/2020 
Numer 33

Różnice między kobietami i mężczyznami w zaufaniu, reakcjach na naruszenie zaufania i odbudowie zaufania

Anna Macko
Kozminski University

8/2020 (33) Decyzje

DOI 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.140

Abstrakt

Przedmiotem badania był wpływ płci na skłonność do zaufania, reakcje na naruszenie zaufania i przeprosiny oraz tempo odbudowywania naruszonego zaufania. Postawiona została hipoteza, że kobiety będą reagowały pozytywniej na przeprosiny, ale będą odbudowywały zaufanie w wolniejszym tempie niż mężczyźni. Wyniki ujawniły brak różnic między płciami w poziomie zaufania ujawnianego w odpowiedzi na przeprosiny za naruszenie zaufania, ale znaczące różnice w tempie przywrócenia zaufania. Kobiety wracały do poziomu zaufania sprzed naruszenia później niż mężczyźni. Ponadto ujawniły się także różnice między płciami w poziomie zaufania przed jego naruszeniem oraz po przeprosinach.

Powiązania

  1. Aksoy, Billur, Haley A. Harwell, Ada Kovaliukaite, and Catherine C. Eckel. (2018). Measuring trust: A reinvestigation. Southern Economic Journal, 84, 992–1000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alesina, Alberto, and Eliana La Ferrara. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. & Piankov, N. (2003). Is trust a bad investment, Working Paper Series. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer P.C., Freitag M. (2018). Measuring trust. In E. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, (pp. 15–23). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bellemare, C. & Kroeger. S. (2003). On Representative Trust. Tilburg University CentER Discussion Paper, 2003–47. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellemare, C., & Kroeger, S. (2007). On representative social capital. European Economic Review, 51, 183–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .euroecorev.2006.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them? Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behaviour, 10, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bies, R. J. & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond Distrust: „Getting Even” and the Need for Revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations, (pp. 246–260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bottom, W.P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S.E., & Murnighan, J.K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497–513. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84–103. [Google Scholar]
  12. Buchan, N.R., Croson, R.T., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: an examination of behaviour and beliefs in the Investment Game. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 68, 466– 476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioural game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaudhuri, A., & Gangadharan, L. (2002). Gender differences in trust and reciprocity. Working paper, Wellesley College. https://ideas.repec.org/p/mlb/wpaper/875.html [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaudhuri, A., & Gangadharan, L. (2007). An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 959–985. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaudhuri, A., Paichayontvijit, & T., Shen L. F. (2013). Gender differences in trust and trustworthiness: Individuals, single sex and mixed sex groups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 181–194. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cox, J. & Deck, C.A., (2006). When Are Women More Generous than Men? Economic Inquiry, 44(4): 587–598. [Google Scholar]
  18. Croson, R., & Buchan, N.R. (1999). Gender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games. American Economic Review, 89(2): 386–391. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cross, S.E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. [Google Scholar]
  20. Demaris, A. & Yang, R. (1994). Race relations and interpersonal mistrust. Sociological Spectrum, 14, 327–349. [Google Scholar]
  21. Derks, J., Lee, N.C., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Adolescent trust and trustworthiness : Role of gender and social value orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1379–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  22. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401 [Google Scholar]
  23. Deutsch, M. (1960). Trust, trustworthiness, and the F scale. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 138–140. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/h0046501 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D. & Schlösser, T. (2016). The psychology of respect: A case study of how behavioral norms regulate human action. In Advances in motivation science, vol. 3, In A. [Google Scholar]
  25. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 3, pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  26. Eagly, A.H. (1997). Sex differences in social behaviour: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 1380–1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b [Google Scholar]
  27. Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ermisch, J., Gambetta, D., Laurie, H., Siedler, T., & Uhrig, S.N. (2009). Measuring people’s trust. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 172(4), 749–69. [Google Scholar]
  29. Espín, A.M., Exadaktylos, F., & Neyse, L. (2016). Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: a tale of two roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 728. https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00728 [Google Scholar]
  30. Evans, A.M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585–1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  31. Exline, J.J., DeShea, L., & Holeman, V.T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 479–504. https://doi. org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.479 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., Schupp, J., von Rosenbladt, B. & Wagner, G.G. (2002). A nationwide laboratory examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioural experiments into representative surveys, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 122, 519–542. [Google Scholar]
  33. Freedman, G., Fetterolf, J., & Beer, J. S. (2019). Engaging in social rejection may be riskier for women. The Journal of social psychology 159(5), 575-591. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gachter, S., Herrmann, B. & Thoni, C. (2004). Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socioeconomic background: survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 505–531. [Google Scholar]
  35. Garbarino, E., & Slonim, R. (2009). The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous US population. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3), 226–240. [Google Scholar]
  36. Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A., & Soutter, C.L. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846. [Google Scholar]
  37. Haselhuhn, M.P., Kennedy, J.A., Kray, L.J., Van Zant, A.B., & Schweitzer, M.E. (2015). Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation. Journal of [Google Scholar]
  38. Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Haselhuhn, M., Schweitzer, M., & Wood, A. (2010). How Implicit Beliefs Influence Trust Recovery. Psychological Science, 21, 645–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610367752 [Google Scholar]
  40. Holm, H. & Nystedt, P. (2008). Trust in surveys and games – a methodological contribution on the influence of money and location. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(4), 522–542. [Google Scholar]
  41. Irwin, K. & Berigan, N. (2013). Trust, Culture, and Cooperation: A Social Dilemma Analysis of Pro-Environmental Behaviors. The Sociological Quarterly, 54, 424–449. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/ tsq.12029 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kawachi, I., 2018. Trust and population health. In E. M. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 447–478). Oxford University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  43. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. https://doi. org/10.1162/003355300555475 [Google Scholar]
  44. Koranyi, N., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Automatic coping mechanisms in committed relationships: increased interpersonal trust as a response to stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 180–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kraemer, H.C., Gardner, C., Brooks, J.O. III, & Yesavage, J.A. (1998). Advantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: Inclusionist versus exclusionist viewpoints. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kramer, K.L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–436. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuźminska, A. (2016). Problems with measurement of Trust and Trustworthiness. What Best Predicts Trust Game Outcomes? Studia i Materiały, 2, 119–130. Doi:10.7172/1733- 9758.2016.22.9 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lazzarini, S., Madalozzo, R., Artes, R. and de Oliveira Siqueira, J. (2004). Measuring trust: an experiment in Brazil. Ibmec working paper, WPE: 2004 – 1. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lewicki, R. & Bunker, B. (1996).Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. [Google Scholar]
  50. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp.114–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lewicki, R.J., & Brinsfield, C. (2017). Trust Repair. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 4(1), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lount, R.B., Zhong, C.B., Sivanathan, N., & Murnighan, J.K. (2008). Getting off on the wrong foot: The timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1601–1612. [Google Scholar]
  53. Miller, A.S. & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy?, Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62–70. [Google Scholar]
  54. Naef, M., & Schupp, J. (2009). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4087). Retrieved from EconStor website: http://www.econstor. eu/dspace/handle/10419/35525. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ohtsubo, Y., Matsunaga, M., Tanaka, H., Suzuki, K., Kobayashi, F., Shibata, E., et al. (2018). Costly apologies communicate conciliatory intention: an fMRI study on forgiveness in response to costly apologies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  56. Oishi, S., S. Kesebir & Diener, E. (2011). Income Inequality and Happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–100. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rahn, W.M., & Transue, J.E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976–1995. Political Psychology, 19, 545–565. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rau, H.A. (2011). Trust and trustworthiness: A survey of gender differences. In S. McGeown (Ed.). [Google Scholar]
  59. Psychology of Gender Differences, (pp. 205–224). New York: Nova Science Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  60. Robinson, S.L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/2393868 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review, 21, 690–695. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rotter, J.B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j .1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x [Google Scholar]
  63. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMR.1998.926617 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sapienza, P., Toldra-Simats, A., & Zingales, L. (2013). Understanding Trust. Economic Journal, 123(573), 1313–1332. [Google Scholar]
  65. Schniter, E., Sheremeta, R. M., & Shields, T. W. (2013). Limitations to signaling trust with all or nothing investments (Working Paper No. 13–24). Economic Science Institute, Chapman University. Retrieved from: https://ideas. repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/13-24.html [Google Scholar]
  66. Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for offensive behaviour. Psychological Science, 21, 1649–1655. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797610384150 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schwieren, C. & Sutter, M. (2008). Trust in Cooperation or Ability? An Experimental Study on Gender Differences. Economics Letters, 99(3), 494–97 [Google Scholar]
  68. Simpson, J.A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In A.W. Kruglanski & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 587–607). New York: Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  69. Slonim, R., & Guillen, P. (2010). Gender selection discrimination: Evidence from a trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 385–405. [Google Scholar]
  70. Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (1999). Determinants of trust. In D. Budescu, I. Erev, and R Zwick (Eds.), Games and human behavior: essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport, (pp. 355-385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  71. Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (2001). Do you trust? Whom do you trust? When do you trust? In S.R. Thye (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 18, pp. 129–160). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group [Google Scholar]
  72. Publishing Limited. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(01)18006-9 [Google Scholar]
  73. Stavrova, O., & Ehlebracht, D. (2016). Cynical beliefs about human nature and income: Longitudinal and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 116–132. [Google Scholar]
  74. Terrell, F. & Barrett, R.K., (1979). Interpersonal trust among college students as a function of race, ex, and socioeconomic status. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1194. [Google Scholar]
  75. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  76. Uslaner, E.M. (2018). The study of trust. In E.M. Uslaner (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  77. Van den Akker, O., M van Vugt, M., van Assen, M. & Wicherts. J.M. (2018). Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness-a meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game. PsyArXiv, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5zbja [Google Scholar]
  78. Vyrastekova, J. & Garikipati, S. (2005). Beliefs and trust: an experiment. Working paper. [Google Scholar]
  79. Yamagishi, T. & Yamagishi, M, (1994). Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 9–66. [Google Scholar]
  80. Yamagishi, T. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  81. Yamagishi, T., Akutsu, S., Cho, K., Inoue, Y., Li, Y., & Matsumoto, Y. (2015). Two-component model of general trust: predicting behavioral trust from attitudinal trust. Social Cognition, 33(5), 436–458. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M. & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence, Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2(1), 145–161. [Google Scholar]
  83. Zak, P.J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and Growth. Economic Journal, 111(4), 295–321. [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Różnice między kobietami i mężczyznami w zaufaniu, reakcjach na naruszenie zaufania i odbudowie zaufania. (2020). Różnice między kobietami i mężczyznami w zaufaniu, reakcjach na naruszenie zaufania i odbudowie zaufania. Decyzje, (33), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.140 (Original work published 8/2020n.e.)

MLA style

„Różnice Między Kobietami I Mężczyznami W Zaufaniu, Reakcjach Na Naruszenie Zaufania I Odbudowie Zaufania”. 8/2020n.e. Decyzje, nr 33, 2020, ss. 56-74.

Chicago style

„Różnice Między Kobietami I Mężczyznami W Zaufaniu, Reakcjach Na Naruszenie Zaufania I Odbudowie Zaufania”. Decyzje, Decyzje, nr 33 (2020): 56-74. doi:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.140.