en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 2018 
Tom 26 
Numer 1

How do we study crowdfunding? An overview of methods and introduction to new research agenda

Agata Stasik
Kozminski University

Ewa Wilczyńska
Kozminski University

2018 26 (1) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.219

Zawartość artykułu

Abstrakt

Purpose: Crowdfunding is a global phenomenon of rising signifcance and impact on different areas of business and social life, investigated across many academic disciplines. The goal of the article is to present the variety of methods applied in crowdfunding research, assess their strengths and weaknesses, offer the typology of methodological approaches, and suggest the most promising direction for further studies. Research limitations/implications: The overview renders crowdfunding studies more accessible for potential newcomers to the feld and strengthens transdisciplinary discussion on crowdfunding. Despite the broad variety of the analyzed articles that reflect the newest trends, the sample is not representative in the statistical meanings of the term.

Design/methodology: The paper is based on the review of the most recent academic and industry literature on crowdfunding and own analysis of data presented by crowdfunding platforms’ operators.

Findings: The article incorporates interrelations of methods, goals of inquiries, and types of results to propose a typology of methodological approaches that researchers currently apply to crowdfunding: from platform­centred to multi­sited. The authors discuss the advantages and limitations of the identifed approaches with the use of multiple examples of recent and most influential studies from the feld and propose the most urgent direction of future inquiries.

Originality/value: The article offers the frst review of methodologies applied in the transdisciplinary area of crowdfunding studies and connects it to broader methodological discussions about transdisciplinary research on the digital phenomena. The review strengthens the transdisciplinary dialog on crowdfunding.

Powiązania

  1. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2011). Friends, Family, and the Flat World: The Geography of Crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper No. 10­08, No. 16820: 1–70, http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1692661 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 24(2): 253–274, http://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12093 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahlers, G.K.C., Cumming, D., Guenther, C. and Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(4): 955–980, http://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.916512 [Google Scholar]
  4. BBVA Research Department (2015). Crowdfunding in 360º: alternative fnancing for the digital era. BBVA Research Department. Obtained from: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp­content/uploads/2015/02/Crowdfunding_Watch.pdf (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayus, B.L. (2013). Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community. UNC Kenan­Flagler Research Paper No. 2012­5. Obtained from: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599 (08.07.2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5): 585–609, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradford, C. (2012). Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review, 1: 1–150, http://doi.org/https://ssrn.com/abstract=1916184 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(1): 3–18, http://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D. and Wright, M. (2015). New fnancial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfnance, crowdfunding, and peer­to­peer innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(1): 9–26, http://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12143 [Google Scholar]
  10. Calic, G. and Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5): 738–767, http://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2016). Breaking New Ground: The Americas Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Obtained from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty­research/centres/alternative­fnance/publications/breakingnew­ground/#.VzOAkvkrK70 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2017). The Americas Alternative Finance Industry Report: Hitting Stride. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Obtained from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fleadmin/user_upload/research/centres/alternative­fnance/downloads/2017­06­americas­alternative­fnance­industry­report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, S., Thomas, S., and Kohli, C. (2016). What really makes a promotional campaign succeed on a crowdfunding platform? Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1): 81–94, http://doi.org/10.2501/JAR­2016­002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, X., Yao, X., and Kotha, S. (2009). Entrepreneur Passion And Preparedness In Business Plan Presentations: A Persuasion Analysis Of Venture Capitalists’ Funding Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1): 199–214, http://doi.org/amj.2009.36462018 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cordova, A., Dolci, J. and Gianfrate, G. (2015). The determinants of crowdfunding success: evidence from technology projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181: 115–124, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.872 [Google Scholar]
  16. CrowdExpert.com (2017). Crowdfunding Industry Statistics 2015 2016. Obtained from: http://crowdexpert.com/crowdfunding­industry­statistics/ (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. Crowdfunding in Europe. Introduction and state of play (2017). European Union: European Parliamentary Research Service. Obtained from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/ 595882/EPRS_BRI(2017)595882_EN.pdf (06.06.2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. CrowdFunding Playbook (2017). Crowdfunding Data Intelligence. Analyse investments and past campaigns. Obtained from: http://www.crowdfundingplaybook.com/crowdfunding­data­intelligence/ (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. Crowdsourcing.org and Massolution (2017). Available Research. Obtained from: http://reports.crowdsourcing.org/index.php?route=information/information&information_id=4 (14.06.2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. Dapp, T. (2014). Fintech – The digital (r)evolution in the fnancial sector. Obtained from: http://www. dbresearch.com (14.06.2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. Dushnitsky, G., Guerini, M., Piva, E. and Rossi­Lamastra, C. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries. California Management Review, 58(2): 44–71. http://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.44 [Google Scholar]
  22. European Commission (2016). Commission staff working document – Report on Crowdfunding in the EU Capital Markets Union. Brussels: European Commission. Obtained from: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/10102/2016/EN/10102­2016­154­EN­F1­1.PDF (05.02.2017). [Google Scholar]
  23. Fleming, L. and Sorenson, O. (2016). Financing by and for the Masses: an introduction to the special issue on crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2): 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  24. Felin, T., Lakhani, K.R. and Tushman, M. (2014). Special issue of Strategic Organization: “Organizing Crowds and Innovation”. Strategic Organization, 12(3): 220–221, http://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014537145 [Google Scholar]
  25. Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T. and Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward­based crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 16(3): 247–269, http://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.916512 [Google Scholar]
  26. Galuszka, P. and Bystrov, V. (2014). Crowdfunding: A Case Study of a New Model of Financing Music Production. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3–4): 233–252, http://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.961349 [Google Scholar]
  27. Geels, F.W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio­technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7): 897–920, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gillespier, T. (2010). The Politics of ‘Platform’. New Media & Society, 12(3): 347–364. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gleasure, R. and Feller, J. (2016). Emerging technologies and the democratisation of fnancial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Information and Organization, 26(4): 101–115, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldman, R. and Gabriel, R.P. (2005). Chapter 2 – Innovation Happens Elsewhere. In Innovation Happens Elsewhere. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, http://doi.org/10.1016/B978­155860889­4/50004­5 [Google Scholar]
  31. Golić, Z. (2014). Advantages of crowdfunding as an alternative source of fnancing of small and medium­sized enterprises. Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics in East Sarajevo, 8: 39–48, http://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS1408039G [Google Scholar]
  32. Guilliatt, R. (1988). Australian Dealmaker: John Cornell The Man Who Sold Hollywood on “Crocodile Dundee”. The New York Times, August 21. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gryczka, M. (2013). Imperatyw zaufania i współpracy w procesie budowania otwartego ekosystemu wiedzy w Polsce. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 21(1): 85–97, http://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084­3356.48 [Google Scholar]
  34. Harrison, R. (2013). Crowdfunding and the revitalisation of the early stage risk capital market: catalyst or chimera? Venture Capital, 15(4): 283–287, http://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.852331 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hauge, J.A. and Chimahusky, S. (2016). Are promises meaningless in an uncertain crowdfunding environment? Economic Inquiry, 54(3): 1621–1630, http://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12319 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hörisch, J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: An empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107: 636–645, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.046 [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson, P.E., Grazioli, S., Jamal, K. and Berryman, R.G. (2001). Detecting deception:adversarial problem solving in a low base­rate world. Cognitive Science, 25: 355–392, http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2503_2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kshetri, N. (2015). Success of Crowd­based Online Technology in Fundraising: An Institutional Perspective. Journal of International Management, 21(2): 100–116, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuti, M. and Madarász, G. (2014). Crowdfunding. Public Finance Quarterly, 59(3): 355–366. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lawton, K. and Marom, D. (2010). The Crowdfunding Revolution – Social networking meets venture fnancing. Charleston: Kevin Lawton, Dan Marom. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin, M. and Viswanathan, S. (2016). Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market. Management Science, 62(5): 1393–1414, http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206 [Google Scholar]
  42. Loewenstein, G. and Small, D. (2007). The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring. Review of General Psychology, 11(2): 112–126, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089­2680.11.2.112 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H. and Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87: 26–38, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  44. Macht, S.A. and Weatherston, J. (2015). Academic Research on Crowdfunders: What’s Been Done and What’s To Come? Strategic Change, 24(3): 191–205, http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2010 [Google Scholar]
  45. Manning, S. and Bejarano, T.A. (2016). Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns. Strategic Organization, http://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016648500 [Google Scholar]
  46. Marcus, G.E. (1998). Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  47. Massolution and Crowdsourcing LLC (2012). Crowdfunding Industry Report, Market Trends, Composition and Crowdfunding Platforms, Abridged Version. Massolution and Crowdsourcing.org. Obtained from: http://www.crowdfunding.nl/wp­content/uploads/2012/05/92834651­Massolution­abridgedCrowd­Funding­Industry­Report1.pdf (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  48. Massolution and Crowdsourcing LLC (2015). Massolution Crowdfunding Industry 2015 Report, Abridged Version. Massolution and Crowdsourcing.org. Obtained from: http://crowdexpert.com/crowdfunding­industry­statistics/ (05.02.2017). [Google Scholar]
  49. Mikołajewska­-Zając, K. (2016). Sharing as labour and as gift: Couchsurfng as an “affective enterprise.” Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4): 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mikołajewska-­Zając, K. (2017). Terms of reference. The moral economy of reputation in a sharing economy platform. European Journal of Social Theory, http://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017716287 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1): 1–16, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  52. Moenninghoff, S.C. and Wieandt, A. (2013). The Future of Peer­to­Peer Finance. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 65(5): 466–487, http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372882 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mollick, E. and Robb, A. (2016). Democratizing Innovation and Capital Access: The Role of Crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2): 72–87, http://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.72 [Google Scholar]
  54. Moritz, A. and Block, J.H. (2016). Crowdfunding: A Literature Review and Research Directions. In: D. Brüntje and O. Gajda (eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 25–53). Springer, http://doi.org/10.1007/978­3­319­18017­5_3 [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Reilly, T. (2005). October 30. What is Web 2.0. O’Reilly Network, http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what­is­web­20.html [Google Scholar]
  56. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M. and Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd­funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470, http://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pełka, W. (2013). Living Labs as a Form of Innovation Development. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 21(4), 139–152, http://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084­3356.86 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pitschner, S. and Pitschner­Finn, S. (2014). Non­proft differentials in crowd­based fnancing: Evidence from 50,000 campaigns. Economics Letters, 123(3): 391–394, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.03.022 [Google Scholar]
  59. PR Newswire (2013). Crowdfunding Market Grows 81% in 2012: Crowdfunding Platforms Raise $2.7 Billion and Fund More Than One Million Campaigns, Finds Research Firm Massolution®. Obtained from: http://www.prnewswire.com/news­releases/crowdfunding­market­grows­81­in­2012­crowdfunding­platforms­raise­27­billion­and­fund­more­than­one­million­campaigns­fnds­researchfrm­massolution­201911701.html# (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  60. Richard, E.E. and Davis, J.R. (2014). NASA Human Health and Performance Center: Open innovation successes and collaborative projects. Acta Astronautica, 104(1): 383–387, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rodak, O. (2017). Twitter jako przedmiot badań socjologicznych i źródło danych społecznych: perspektywa konstruktywistyczna. Studia Socjologiczne, 226(3): 209–236. [Google Scholar]
  62. Royal, C., Sampath, S. and Windsor, G. (2014). Microfnance, Crowdfunding and Sustainability: A Case Study of Telecenters in a South Asian Developing Country. Strategic Change, 23: 425–438, http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1987 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwartz, A.A. (2015). Inclusive Crowdfunding. Utah Law Review, 516(2014): 661–675. [Google Scholar]
  64. Siering, M., Koch, J.­A. and Deokar, A.V. (2016). Detecting Fraudulent Behavior on Crowdfunding Platforms: The Role of Linguistic and Content­Based Cues in Static and Dynamic Contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(2): 1–35. http://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1205930 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sigar, K. (2012). Fret no more: Inapplicability of crowdfunding concerns in the internet age and the jobs act’s safeguards. Administrative Law Review, 64(2): 473–506. [Google Scholar]
  66. Silver, E. and Khatri, A. (2016). Endowed by the Crowd? Insights Into the New Wave of Crowdfunding and Its Viability. Journal of Taxation & Regulation of Financial Institutions, 29(3): 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  67. Stasik, A. (2017). Global controversies in local settings: anti­fracking activism in the era of Web 2.0. online frst, Journal of Risk Research: 1–17, http://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313759 [Google Scholar]
  68. The European Crowdfunding Network AISBL (2014). Review of Crowdfunding Regulation Interpretations of existing regulation concerning crowdfunding in Europe, North America and Israel. The European Crowdfunding Network AISBL. Obtained from: http://eurocrowd.org/2014/12/12/ecn­review­crowdfunding­regulation­2014/ (10.06.2016). [Google Scholar]
  69. Torkanovskiy, E. (2016). Non­equity Crowdfunding as a National Phenomenon in a Global Industry: The Case of Russia. In: D. Brüntje and O. Gajda (eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 115–123). Springer, http://doi.org/10.1007/978­3­319­18017­5_8 [Google Scholar]
  70. Turan, S.S. (2015). Financial Innovation – Crowdfunding: Friend or Foe? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195: 353–362, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.334 [Google Scholar]
  71. US Securities and Exchange Commission (2017). Regulation Crowdfunding: A Small Entity Compliance Guide for Issuers. Obtained from: https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/secg/rccomplianceguide­051316.htm (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  72. Valanciene, L. and Jegeleviciute, S. (2013). Valuation of crowdfunding: Benefts and drawbacks. Economics and Management, 18(1): 39–48, http://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.1.3713 [Google Scholar]
  73. Vasileiadou, E., Huijben, J.C.C.M. and Raven, R.P.J.M. (2016). Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128: 142–155, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.028 [Google Scholar]
  74. Vogt, N. and Mitchell, A. (2016). Crowdfunded Journalism: A Small but Growing Addition to Publicly Driven Journalism – Analysis. Pew Research Center Journalism&Media. Obtained from: http://www.journalism.org/2016/01/20/crowdfunded­journalism/ (12.07.2007) [Google Scholar]
  75. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540­5885.2006.00192_2.x [Google Scholar]
  76. Wardrop, R., Zhang, B., Rau, R. and Gray, M. (2015). Moving Mainstream – The European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Obtained from: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/index.php?id=6481#.VTOtICGqpBd (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  77. Wheat, R.E., Wang, Y., Byrnes, J.E. and Ranganathan, J. (2013). Raising money for scientifc research through crowdfunding. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(2): 71–72, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  78. World Bank (2013). Crowdfunding’s Potential for the Developing World. Washington DC: World Bank. Finance and Private Sector Development Department. Obtained from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17626 (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  79. Xu, B., Zheng, H., Xu, Y. and Wang, T. (2016). Confgurational paths to sponsor satisfaction in crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 69(2): 915–927, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.040 [Google Scholar]
  80. Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J. and Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information and Management, 51(4), 488–496, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  81. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2011). Friends, Family, and the Flat World: The Geography of Crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper No. 10­08, No. 16820: 1–70, http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1692661 [Google Scholar]
  82. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 24(2): 253–274, http://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12093 [Google Scholar]
  83. Ahlers, G.K.C., Cumming, D., Guenther, C. and Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(4): 955–980, http://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.916512 [Google Scholar]
  84. BBVA Research Department (2015). Crowdfunding in 360º: alternative fnancing for the digital era. BBVA Research Department. Obtained from: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp­content/uploads/2015/02/Crowdfunding_Watch.pdf (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  85. Bayus, B.L. (2013). Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community. UNC Kenan­Flagler Research Paper No. 2012­5. Obtained from: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599 (08.07.2017). [Google Scholar]
  86. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5): 585–609, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  87. Bradford, C. (2012). Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review, 1: 1–150, http://doi.org/https://ssrn.com/abstract=1916184 [Google Scholar]
  88. Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(1): 3–18, http://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024 [Google Scholar]
  89. Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D. and Wright, M. (2015). New fnancial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfnance, crowdfunding, and peer­to­peer innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(1): 9–26, http://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12143 [Google Scholar]
  90. Calic, G. and Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5): 738–767, http://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201 [Google Scholar]
  91. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2016). Breaking New Ground: The Americas Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Obtained from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty­research/centres/alternative­fnance/publications/breakingnew­ground/#.VzOAkvkrK70 [Google Scholar]
  92. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2017). The Americas Alternative Finance Industry Report: Hitting Stride. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Obtained from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fleadmin/user_upload/research/centres/alternative­fnance/downloads/2017­06­americas­alternative­fnance­industry­report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  93. Chen, S., Thomas, S., and Kohli, C. (2016). What really makes a promotional campaign succeed on a crowdfunding platform? Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1): 81–94, http://doi.org/10.2501/JAR­2016­002 [Google Scholar]
  94. Chen, X., Yao, X., and Kotha, S. (2009). Entrepreneur Passion And Preparedness In Business Plan Presentations: A Persuasion Analysis Of Venture Capitalists’ Funding Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1): 199–214, http://doi.org/amj.2009.36462018 [Google Scholar]
  95. Cordova, A., Dolci, J. and Gianfrate, G. (2015). The determinants of crowdfunding success: evidence from technology projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181: 115–124, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.872 [Google Scholar]
  96. CrowdExpert.com (2017). Crowdfunding Industry Statistics 2015 2016. Obtained from: http://crowdexpert.com/crowdfunding­industry­statistics/ (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  97. Crowdfunding in Europe. Introduction and state of play (2017). European Union: European Parliamentary Research Service. Obtained from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/ 595882/EPRS_BRI(2017)595882_EN.pdf (06.06.2017). [Google Scholar]
  98. CrowdFunding Playbook (2017). Crowdfunding Data Intelligence. Analyse investments and past campaigns. Obtained from: http://www.crowdfundingplaybook.com/crowdfunding­data­intelligence/ (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  99. Crowdsourcing.org and Massolution (2017). Available Research. Obtained from: http://reports.crowdsourcing.org/index.php?route=information/information&information_id=4 (14.06.2017). [Google Scholar]
  100. Dapp, T. (2014). Fintech – The digital (r)evolution in the fnancial sector. Obtained from: http://www. dbresearch.com (14.06.2017). [Google Scholar]
  101. Dushnitsky, G., Guerini, M., Piva, E. and Rossi­Lamastra, C. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries. California Management Review, 58(2): 44–71. http://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.44 [Google Scholar]
  102. European Commission (2016). Commission staff working document – Report on Crowdfunding in the EU Capital Markets Union. Brussels: European Commission. Obtained from: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/10102/2016/EN/10102­2016­154­EN­F1­1.PDF (05.02.2017). [Google Scholar]
  103. Fleming, L. and Sorenson, O. (2016). Financing by and for the Masses: an introduction to the special issue on crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2): 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  104. Felin, T., Lakhani, K.R. and Tushman, M. (2014). Special issue of Strategic Organization: “Organizing Crowds and Innovation”. Strategic Organization, 12(3): 220–221, http://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014537145 [Google Scholar]
  105. Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T. and Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward­based crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 16(3): 247–269, http://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.916512 [Google Scholar]
  106. Galuszka, P. and Bystrov, V. (2014). Crowdfunding: A Case Study of a New Model of Financing Music Production. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3–4): 233–252, http://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.961349 [Google Scholar]
  107. Geels, F.W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio­technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7): 897–920, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 [Google Scholar]
  108. Gillespier, T. (2010). The Politics of ‘Platform’. New Media & Society, 12(3): 347–364. [Google Scholar]
  109. Gleasure, R. and Feller, J. (2016). Emerging technologies and the democratisation of fnancial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Information and Organization, 26(4): 101–115, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  110. Goldman, R. and Gabriel, R.P. (2005). Chapter 2 – Innovation Happens Elsewhere. In Innovation Happens Elsewhere. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, http://doi.org/10.1016/B978­155860889­4/50004­5 [Google Scholar]
  111. Golić, Z. (2014). Advantages of crowdfunding as an alternative source of fnancing of small and medium­sized enterprises. Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics in East Sarajevo, 8: 39–48, http://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS1408039G [Google Scholar]
  112. Guilliatt, R. (1988). Australian Dealmaker: John Cornell The Man Who Sold Hollywood on “Crocodile Dundee”. The New York Times, August 21. [Google Scholar]
  113. Gryczka, M. (2013). Imperatyw zaufania i współpracy w procesie budowania otwartego ekosystemu wiedzy w Polsce. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 21(1): 85–97, http://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084­3356.48 [Google Scholar]
  114. Harrison, R. (2013). Crowdfunding and the revitalisation of the early stage risk capital market: catalyst or chimera? Venture Capital, 15(4): 283–287, http://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.852331 [Google Scholar]
  115. Hauge, J.A. and Chimahusky, S. (2016). Are promises meaningless in an uncertain crowdfunding environment? Economic Inquiry, 54(3): 1621–1630, http://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12319 [Google Scholar]
  116. Hörisch, J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: An empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107: 636–645, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.046 [Google Scholar]
  117. Johnson, P.E., Grazioli, S., Jamal, K. and Berryman, R.G. (2001). Detecting deception:adversarial problem solving in a low base­rate world. Cognitive Science, 25: 355–392, http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2503_2 [Google Scholar]
  118. Kshetri, N. (2015). Success of Crowd­based Online Technology in Fundraising: An Institutional Perspective. Journal of International Management, 21(2): 100–116, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  119. Kuti, M. and Madarász, G. (2014). Crowdfunding. Public Finance Quarterly, 59(3): 355–366. [Google Scholar]
  120. Lawton, K. and Marom, D. (2010). The Crowdfunding Revolution – Social networking meets venture fnancing. Charleston: Kevin Lawton, Dan Marom. [Google Scholar]
  121. Lin, M. and Viswanathan, S. (2016). Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market. Management Science, 62(5): 1393–1414, http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206 [Google Scholar]
  122. Loewenstein, G. and Small, D. (2007). The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring. Review of General Psychology, 11(2): 112–126, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089­2680.11.2.112 [Google Scholar]
  123. Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H. and Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87: 26–38, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  124. Macht, S.A. and Weatherston, J. (2015). Academic Research on Crowdfunders: What’s Been Done and What’s To Come? Strategic Change, 24(3): 191–205, http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2010 [Google Scholar]
  125. Manning, S. and Bejarano, T.A. (2016). Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns. Strategic Organization, http://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016648500 [Google Scholar]
  126. Marcus, G.E. (1998). Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  127. Massolution and Crowdsourcing LLC (2012). Crowdfunding Industry Report, Market Trends, Composition and Crowdfunding Platforms, Abridged Version. Massolution and Crowdsourcing.org. Obtained from: http://www.crowdfunding.nl/wp­content/uploads/2012/05/92834651­Massolution­abridgedCrowd­Funding­Industry­Report1.pdf (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  128. Massolution and Crowdsourcing LLC (2015). Massolution Crowdfunding Industry 2015 Report, Abridged Version. Massolution and Crowdsourcing.org. Obtained from: http://crowdexpert.com/crowdfunding­industry­statistics/ (05.02.2017). [Google Scholar]
  129. Mikołajewska­-Zając, K. (2016). Sharing as labour and as gift: Couchsurfng as an “affective enterprise.” Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4): 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  130. Mikołajewska-­Zając, K. (2017). Terms of reference. The moral economy of reputation in a sharing economy platform. European Journal of Social Theory, http://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017716287 [Google Scholar]
  131. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1): 1–16, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  132. Moenninghoff, S.C. and Wieandt, A. (2013). The Future of Peer­to­Peer Finance. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 65(5): 466–487, http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372882 [Google Scholar]
  133. Mollick, E. and Robb, A. (2016). Democratizing Innovation and Capital Access: The Role of Crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2): 72–87, http://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.72 [Google Scholar]
  134. Moritz, A. and Block, J.H. (2016). Crowdfunding: A Literature Review and Research Directions. In: D. Brüntje and O. Gajda (eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 25–53). Springer, http://doi.org/10.1007/978­3­319­18017­5_3 [Google Scholar]
  135. O’Reilly, T. (2005). October 30. What is Web 2.0. O’Reilly Network, http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what­is­web­20.html [Google Scholar]
  136. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M. and Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd­funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470, http://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079 [Google Scholar]
  137. Pełka, W. (2013). Living Labs as a Form of Innovation Development. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 21(4), 139–152, http://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084­3356.86 [Google Scholar]
  138. Pitschner, S. and Pitschner­Finn, S. (2014). Non­proft differentials in crowd­based fnancing: Evidence from 50,000 campaigns. Economics Letters, 123(3): 391–394, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.03.022 [Google Scholar]
  139. PR Newswire (2013). Crowdfunding Market Grows 81% in 2012: Crowdfunding Platforms Raise $2.7 Billion and Fund More Than One Million Campaigns, Finds Research Firm Massolution®. Obtained from: http://www.prnewswire.com/news­releases/crowdfunding­market­grows­81­in­2012­crowdfunding­platforms­raise­27­billion­and­fund­more­than­one­million­campaigns­fnds­researchfrm­massolution­201911701.html# (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  140. Richard, E.E. and Davis, J.R. (2014). NASA Human Health and Performance Center: Open innovation successes and collaborative projects. Acta Astronautica, 104(1): 383–387, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  141. Rodak, O. (2017). Twitter jako przedmiot badań socjologicznych i źródło danych społecznych: perspektywa konstruktywistyczna. Studia Socjologiczne, 226(3): 209–236. [Google Scholar]
  142. Royal, C., Sampath, S. and Windsor, G. (2014). Microfnance, Crowdfunding and Sustainability: A Case Study of Telecenters in a South Asian Developing Country. Strategic Change, 23: 425–438, http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1987 [Google Scholar]
  143. Schwartz, A.A. (2015). Inclusive Crowdfunding. Utah Law Review, 516(2014): 661–675. [Google Scholar]
  144. Siering, M., Koch, J.­A. and Deokar, A.V. (2016). Detecting Fraudulent Behavior on Crowdfunding Platforms: The Role of Linguistic and Content­Based Cues in Static and Dynamic Contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(2): 1–35. http://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1205930 [Google Scholar]
  145. Sigar, K. (2012). Fret no more: Inapplicability of crowdfunding concerns in the internet age and the jobs act’s safeguards. Administrative Law Review, 64(2): 473–506. [Google Scholar]
  146. Silver, E. and Khatri, A. (2016). Endowed by the Crowd? Insights Into the New Wave of Crowdfunding and Its Viability. Journal of Taxation & Regulation of Financial Institutions, 29(3): 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  147. Stasik, A. (2017). Global controversies in local settings: anti­fracking activism in the era of Web 2.0. online frst, Journal of Risk Research: 1–17, http://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313759 [Google Scholar]
  148. The European Crowdfunding Network AISBL (2014). Review of Crowdfunding Regulation Interpretations of existing regulation concerning crowdfunding in Europe, North America and Israel. The European Crowdfunding Network AISBL. Obtained from: http://eurocrowd.org/2014/12/12/ecn­review­crowdfunding­regulation­2014/ (10.06.2016). [Google Scholar]
  149. Torkanovskiy, E. (2016). Non­equity Crowdfunding as a National Phenomenon in a Global Industry: The Case of Russia. In: D. Brüntje and O. Gajda (eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 115–123). Springer, http://doi.org/10.1007/978­3­319­18017­5_8 [Google Scholar]
  150. Turan, S.S. (2015). Financial Innovation – Crowdfunding: Friend or Foe? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195: 353–362, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.334 [Google Scholar]
  151. US Securities and Exchange Commission (2017). Regulation Crowdfunding: A Small Entity Compliance Guide for Issuers. Obtained from: https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/secg/rccomplianceguide­051316.htm (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  152. Valanciene, L. and Jegeleviciute, S. (2013). Valuation of crowdfunding: Benefts and drawbacks. Economics and Management, 18(1): 39–48, http://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.1.3713 [Google Scholar]
  153. Vasileiadou, E., Huijben, J.C.C.M. and Raven, R.P.J.M. (2016). Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128: 142–155, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.028 [Google Scholar]
  154. Vogt, N. and Mitchell, A. (2016). Crowdfunded Journalism: A Small but Growing Addition to Publicly Driven Journalism – Analysis. Pew Research Center Journalism&Media. Obtained from: http://www.journalism.org/2016/01/20/crowdfunded­journalism/ (12.07.2007) [Google Scholar]
  155. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540­5885.2006.00192_2.x [Google Scholar]
  156. Wardrop, R., Zhang, B., Rau, R. and Gray, M. (2015). Moving Mainstream – The European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Obtained from: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/index.php?id=6481#.VTOtICGqpBd (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  157. Wheat, R.E., Wang, Y., Byrnes, J.E. and Ranganathan, J. (2013). Raising money for scientifc research through crowdfunding. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(2): 71–72, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  158. World Bank (2013). Crowdfunding’s Potential for the Developing World. Washington DC: World Bank. Finance and Private Sector Development Department. Obtained from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17626 (26.04.2017). [Google Scholar]
  159. Xu, B., Zheng, H., Xu, Y. and Wang, T. (2016). Confgurational paths to sponsor satisfaction in crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 69(2): 915–927, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.040 [Google Scholar]
  160. Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J. and Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information and Management, 51(4), 488–496, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Stasik, Agata & Wilczyńska, Ewa (2018). Stasik, A. , & Wilczyńska, E.. (2018). How do we study crowdfunding? An overview of methods and introduction to new research agenda. Central European Management Journal, 26(1), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.219 (Original work published 2018)

MLA style

Stasik, Agata and Wilczyńska, Ewa. Stasik, A. , i E. Wilczyńska. „How Do We Study Crowdfunding? An Overview Of Methods And Introduction To New Research Agenda”. 2018. Central European Management Journal, t. 26, nr 1, 2018, ss. 49-78.

Chicago style

Stasik, Agata and Wilczyńska, Ewa. Stasik, Agata , i Ewa Wilczyńska. „How Do We Study Crowdfunding? An Overview Of Methods And Introduction To New Research Agenda”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 26, nr 1 (2018): 49-78. doi:10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.219.

Prawa autorskie

copyright info

CC-BY-NC-ND

Podobne artykuły: