From 2023 "Central European Management Journal" (CEMJ) is published by Emerald.
The link to our website and content from 2023 is as follows: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/cemj
IMPORTANT: It has been brought to our attention that the following website is posing as CEMJ: http://journals.kozminski.cem-j.org/index.php/pl_cemj/index. Please do not submit any articles to this website. As of 2023, CEMJ is published by Emerald and, as such, this is the genuine website for the journal.
"Central European Management Journal" is a scientific quarterly pertaining to management in public and private sector institutions which publishes research results and theoretical analyses and reviews.
Our goal is to facilitate a better understanding of the essence of management and research cooperation within the academic community and thus to have a positive influence on the world of management sciences.
CEMJ publishes articles related to the following fields: human resource management, theory of organization, strategic management, corporate order, managerial economy, accounting and finance. The articles may be theoretical or empirical in nature and may be based in a variety of disciplines, such as economy, psychology, sociology and law.
CEMJ appears on the list of Polish and foreign scientific journals led by the Minister of Science and Higher Education for the parametric evaluation of the scientific units with the allocated number of points 100. CEMJ is indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (Emerging Sources Citation Index).
Publication is free of charge. All articles published are open-access and are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license as currently displayed on here.
Manuscript checking is done using iThenticate which provides plagiarism prevention services to publishers around the world.
Editor in Chief
Pawel Korzynski, Kozminski University, Poland
Domenico Buccella, Kozminski University, Poland
Chris William Callaghan, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
Marco Dall'Aglio, LUISS University, Rome, Italy
Izabela Kowalik, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
Karolina Małagocka, Kozminski University, Poland
Jordi Paniagua, Catholic University of Valencia, Spain
Urban Pauli, Krakow University of Economics, Poland
Marta Postuła, University of Warsaw, Poland
Edyta Rudawska, University of Szczecin, Poland
Bruno Schivinski, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Anna Sender, University of Lucerne, Switzerland
Dariusz Siemieniako, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
André van Stel, Trinity Business School (Trinity College Dublin), Ireland
Jan Jakub Szczygielski, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Krzysztof Wach, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Dorota Dobija, Kozminski University, Poland
Stefan Kwiatkowski, Kozminski University, Poland
Bogdan Wawrzyniak, Kozminski University, Poland
Piotr Rządca, Kozminski University, Poland
Mariusz Andrzejewski, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Heidrich Balazs, Budapest Business School, Hungary
Zbigniew Bochniarz, University of Washington, US
Paweł Bryła, University of Lodz, Poland
Kurt Johnny Burneo Farfan, Centrum Graduate Business School, Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
Zoltan Buzady, Corvinus Business School, Hungary
Gosia Ciesielska, Teesside University Business School, United Kingdom
Sylwia Ciuk, Oxford Brookes University Business School, United Kingdom
Nick Chandler, Budapest Business School, Hungary
Giovanna Devetag, LUISS Universita Guido Carli, Italy
Percy S. Marquina Feldman, Centrum Graduate Business School, Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
Toshio Goto, Japan University of Economics, Japan
Giuseppe Grossi, Kristianstad University, Sweden
Julita Haber, Fordham University, US
Gábor Harangozó, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary
Ilona Hunek, University College Dublin, Ireland
Krzysztof Jackowicz, Kozminski University, Poland
Sebastian Jarzębowski, Kozminski University, Poland
Dariusz Jemielniak, Kozminski University, Poland
Sten Jonsson, Goeteborg University, Sweden
Zvi Joshman, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
Andreas Kaplan, ESCP Europe, France
Peter Karacsony, University J. Selyeho, Slovakia
Eugeniusz Kąciak, Brock University, Ontario, Canada
Izabela Koładkiewicz, Kozminski University, Poland
Oskar Kowalewski, IESEG School of Management, France
Józefa Kramer, University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Anna Lis, Gdansk University of Technology, Poland
Jasmin Mahadevan, Pforzheim University, Germany
Monika Marcinkowska, University of Lodz, Poland
Gianluca Mattarocci, LUISS Universita Guido Carli, Italy
Czesław Mesjasz, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Paweł Mielcarz, Kozminski University, Poland
Henryk Mruk, Poznan University of Economics, Poland
Bogdan Nogalski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Bartłomiej Nowak, Kozminski University, Poland
Daria Peljhan, Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Oksana Polinkevych, Lutsk National Technical University, Ukraine
Narcyz Roztocki, State University of New York, New Patlz, US
Robert Rządca, Kozminski University, Poland
Jan Napoleon Saykiewicz, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh University, US
Giovanni Schiuma, University of Basilicata, Italy
Zeljko Sevic, Caledonian Business School, UK
JC Spender, Lund University, Sweden
Abdulsatar Abduljabar Sultan, Lebanese French University, Iraq
Charles Vincent, Centrum Graduate Business School, Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru
Linying (Lin) Dong, Ryerson University, Canada
Rong Zhang, Nishinippon Institute of Technology, Japan
- Artykuły naukowe, które zostały skierowane do recenzji oceniane są przez dwóch Recenzentów (niezależnie) wyznaczonych przez redaktorów tematycznych. Redakcja dokłada wszelkich starań, aby Recenzenci powoływani byli spoza jednostki naukowej afiliowanej przez Autora publikacji.
- Tożsamość Autorów nie jest ujawniana Recenzentom.
- Tożsamość Recenzentów nie jest ujawniana Autorom.
- Recenzja (pobierz formularz recenzji) zawiera m.in. jednoznaczny wniosek recenzenta dotyczący warunków dopuszczenia artykułu naukowego do publikacji lub jego odrzucenia.
W przypadkach dyskusyjnych (np. niezgodne bądź sprzeczne recenzje) o dopuszczeniu do druku decyduje Redakcja, która może także powołać dodatkowego Recenzenta.
Abstrakty i indeksacja
"Central European Management Journal" is committed to upholding the ethical standards of scientific publications and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. All the articles submitted for publication in CEMJ are peer reviewed for authenticity, ethical issues and usefulness.
These statements below are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Duties of the Editorial Board
- Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
- Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
- Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
- Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
- Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
- Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
- Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
- Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
- Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
- Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
- Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
- Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.