Wyniki wyszukiwania

Rankings revisited

Ignacy Kaliszewski

2018

( 30 )

DOI: 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.115

https:/doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.115

Abstrakt

We argue that rankings, as they are commonly used, can be, and perhaps are, misleading and potentially harmful.

With little extra effort, however, one can gain much more insight into relations among the objects ranked and, in the consequence, gain a better understanding of the ranking. The fundamental notion used to compare and evaluate rankings in our analysis is that of Pareto optymality. General claims are illustrated with the ranking of Polish universities published by Perspektywy monthly in 2016.

This note is based on results that are well known in the areas of multiobjective optimization and multiple-criteria decision analysis. The objective of the note is to point to the shortcomings and potential pitfalls behind the common use and understanding of rankings

Pobrań1086

A Few Comments on Computer−aided Multiple Criteria Decision Support

Ignacy Kaliszewski

2008

( 9 )

https:/doi.org/

Abstrakt

We are concerned with prerequisites for a wide acceptance in practice of computer based methods to support decision making within multiple criteria environment. An attempt is made to identify key obstacles, which hamper this process and, building on the published results of the Author, ways to overcome them, both in the methodological and the technical aspects, are outlined

Pobrań354

Ignacy Kaliszewski – „Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji –obliczenia miękkie dla złożonych problemów decyzyjnych”

Marcin Malawski

2008

( 9 )

https:/doi.org/

Abstrakt

Pobrań612

Francois Rabelais: Gargantua i Pantagruel. Komentarze

Tadeusz Tyszka; Ignacy Kaliszewski