en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 9/2022 
Tom 30 
Numer 3

Knowledge of Network-Based Market Orientation for the Internationalization of Disruptive Innovation in SMEs

Akmal Hyder
University of Gävle

Agneta Sundström
University of Gävle

Ehsanul Chowdhury
University of Gävle

9/2022 30 (3) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.81


Purpose: This study explores the knowledge development of network-based market orientation (MO) for the internationalization of disruptive innovation (DI) by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Methodology: To manage knowledge development for DI internationalization, a business model was applied to a case study of an individual example. The studied company participated in a series of workshops and allowed on-site visits and interviews for two years in a European Union-funded project. The workshops helped the company to gather MO and networking knowledge and then apply that knowledge internally in the organization and externally, in interactions with suppliers, buyers, and other members of the buyer chain.

Findings: Although technological and market efforts usually proceed separately, this study shows that technical and MO knowledge can go together through external and internal networking.

Research limitations/implications: To overcome the limitation of having just one example in a case study, several SMEs can be included in future research to produce a comparative analysis. A further study can investigate how technical and market networks can be integrated in the knowledge development process to speed up internationalization. Managers can learn to internationalize DI by collaborating, knowledge sharing, and networking with other SMEs, suppliers, and firms in the buyer chain.

Originality: The current study contributes to DI literature by highlighting knowledge generation in SMEs from a process perspective as well as by integrating technical and MO efforts for internationalization.


  1. Burgess, S.M. & Steenkamp, J.E.M. (2006). Marketing renaissance: how research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 337–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Carayannopoulos, S. (2017). Small, young firm flexibility and performance in the context of disruptive innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(1–2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2017.081467 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chetty, S.K., & Wilson, H.I.M. (2003). Collaborating with competitors to acquire resources. International Business Review, 12(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00088-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen, C.M., Raynor, M.E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation?. Harvard Business Review, December, 44–53. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from: https://www.innosight.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Innosight_HBR_What-is-Disruptive-Innovation.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen, C.M., & Bower, J.L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3%3C197::AID-SMJ804%3E3.0.CO;2-U [Google Scholar]
  6. Corsaro, D., Ramos, C., Henneberga, S., & Naudé, P. (2012). The impact of network configurations on value constellations in business markets — the case of an innovation network. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cowden, B.J., & Alhorr, H.S. (2013). Disruptive innovation in multinational enterprises. Multinational Business Review, 21(4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-05-2013-0027 [Google Scholar]
  9. Doz, Y. (2011). Qualitative research for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.18 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dyduch, W. (2019). Entrepreneurial Strategy Stimulating Value Creation: Conceptual Findings and Some Empirical Tests. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070304 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 [Google Scholar]
  13. [Google Scholar]
  14. Elg, U. (2008). Inter-firm market orientation and the influence of network and relational factors. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. [Google Scholar]
  16. Erdil, S., Erdil, O., & Keskin, H. (2004).The relationships between market orientation, firm innovativeness and innovation performance. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 1(1), 1–11. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from: https://gbata.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/JGBAT_Vol1-1-p4.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. Fregidou-Malama, M., & Hyder, A.S. (2015). Impact of culture on marketing of health services – Elekta in Brazil”, International Business Review, 24(3), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  18. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gil-Barragan, J.M., Belso-Martínez, J.A., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2020). When do domestic networks cause accelerated internationalization under different decision-making logic? Evidence from weak institutional environment. European Business Review, 32(2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0191 [Google Scholar]
  20. Głodowska, A., Maciejewski, M., & Wach, K. (2019). How Entrepreneurial Orientation Stimulates Different Types of Knowledge in the Internationalisation Process of Firms from Poland?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070104 [Google Scholar]
  21. Głodowska, A., Pera, B., & Wach, K. (2019). International Strategy as the Facilitator of the Speed, Scope, and Scale of Firms’ Internationalization. Central European Management Journal, 27(3), 55–84. https://doi: 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and assessment of reliability and validity. Journal of Strategic Management, 27, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.511 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gummesson, E. (2017). From relationship marketing to total relationship marketing and beyond. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2016-0398 [Google Scholar]
  24. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hopp, C., Antons, D., Kaminski, J., & Oliver Salge, T. (2018). Disruptive innovation: conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and research opportunities in the digital age. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(3), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12448 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hunt, S.D., & Lambe, C.J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: market orientation, relationship marketing and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Review, 2(4), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00029 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyder, A.S., & Fregidou-Malama, M. (2009). Services marketing in a cross-cultural environment: the case of Egypt”, Journal of Services Marketing, 23(4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040910965593 [Google Scholar]
  28. Håkansson, H., Ford, D., Gadde, L.E., Snehota, I., & Waluszewski, A. (2009). Business in Networks. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2010.511980 [Google Scholar]
  29. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676 [Google Scholar]
  30. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kohli, A.K., & Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224299005400201 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liao, S-H., Chang, W-J., Wu, C-C., & Katrichis, J.M. (2011). A survey of market orientation research (1995–2008). Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & de Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362 [Google Scholar]
  34. [Google Scholar]
  35. [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez-Vergara, S.J., & Valls-Pasola, J. (2021). Clarifying the disruptive innovation puzzle: a critical review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 893–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2019-0198 [Google Scholar]
  37. Medlin, C.J., & Törnroos, J.Å. (2015). Exploring and exploiting network relationships to commercialize technology: a biofuel case. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.036 [Google Scholar]
  38. Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0092070305281090 [Google Scholar]
  39. Miles, M. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: the problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590–601. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392365 [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgan, N.A., Vorhies, D.W., & Mason, C.H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.764 [Google Scholar]
  41. Narver, J.C., & Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224299005400403 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ngo, Q-H. (2021). The impact of market orientation on small businesses’ performance in Vietnam: The mediating effects of the management accounting system. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090304. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of evidence. International Journal of Management Review, 5/6(3/4), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Radicic, D., & Djalilov, K. (2019), “The impact of technological and non-technological innovations on export intensity in SMEs”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(4), 612–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-08-2018-0259 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rasool, F., Koomsap, P, Afsar, B., & Panezai, B.A. (2018), A framework for disruptive innovation. Foresight, 20(3), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2017-0057 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rissanen, T., Ermolaeva, L., Torkkeli, L., Ahi, A., & Saarenketo, S. (2019). The role of home market context in business model change in internationalizing SMEs. European Business Review, 32(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2018-0168 [Google Scholar]
  47. Robertson, N., & Luiz, J.M. (2019). Exploiting emerging market complementarities: delayed, then accelerated internationalisation in a technology EMNE. Multinational Business Review, 27(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2018-0016 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt, G.M., & Druehl, C.T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(4), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00306.x. [Google Scholar]
  49. Shang, T., Miao, X. & Abdul, W. (2019). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of disruptive innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2018-0056 [Google Scholar]
  50. Skarzynski, P., & Rufat‐Latre, J. (2011). Lessons to jumpstart disruptive innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 39(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571111095367 [Google Scholar]
  51. Slater, S.F., & Narver, J.C. (1998). Customer-led and market-oriented: let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199810)19:10%3C1001::AID-SMJ996%3E3.0.CO;2-4 [Google Scholar]
  52. Story, V., Hart, S., & O’Malley, L. (2009). Relational resources in competences of radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(5/6), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725709X461803 [Google Scholar]
  53. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sundström, A., Hyder, A.S., & Chowdhury, E.H. (2020). Market-oriented CSR implementation in SMEs with sustainable innovations: an action research approach. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(5), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-03-2020-0091 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sundström, A., Hyder, A.S., & Chowdhury, E.H. (2021). Market-oriented business model for SMEs’ disruptive innovations internationalization. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(5), 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-10-2019-0527 [Google Scholar]
  56. [Google Scholar]
  57. Swedberg, R. (1994). Schumpeter – Om skapande förstörelse och entreprenörskap (Schumpeter – About creation, destruction and entrepreneurship). Ratio AB Timbro, Stockholm, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yin, R.K. (2014), Case Study Research – Design and Methods, 5th ed. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yu, D., & Hang, C.C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599648 [Google Scholar]
  60. Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. (2017). From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0107-7 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wach, K. (2021). The evolution of the Uppsala model: Towards non-linearity of internationalization of firms. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2021.0702.01 [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Hyder, Akmal S. & Sundström, Agneta & Chowdhury, Ehsanul H. (2022). Knowledge of Network-Based Market Orientation for the Internationalization of Disruptive Innovation in SMEs. (2022). Knowledge of Network-Based Market Orientation for the Internationalization of Disruptive Innovation in SMEs. Central European Management Journal, 30(3), 36-60. https://doi.org/ 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.81 (Original work published 9/2022n.e.)

MLA style

Hyder, Akmal S. and Sundström, Agneta and Chowdhury, Ehsanul H.. „Knowledge Of Network-Based Market Orientation For The Internationalization Of Disruptive Innovation In Smes”. 9/2022n.e. Central European Management Journal, t. 30, nr 3, 2022, ss. 36-60.

Chicago style

Hyder, Akmal S. and Sundström, Agneta and Chowdhury, Ehsanul H.. „Knowledge Of Network-Based Market Orientation For The Internationalization Of Disruptive Innovation In Smes”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 30, nr 3 (2022): 36-60. doi: 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.81.