en pl
en pl

Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 2006 
Tom 5 
Numer 3

Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc

David Boje
New Mexico State University

2006 5 (3) Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Abstrakt

This is a reply to an essay that John Krizanc sent to me. Krizanc (1989) is also the author of the Tamara play. I have applied Tamara to organizing (Boje, 1995). Here I want to look at some of the consequences of interactive organizing that is theorized as a postmodern narrative.

Producers and consumers meet in the narrative space we call 'organizing.' As Roland Barthes (1970) put it, “the goal of a literary work is to make the reader no longer a consumer but a producer of the text” (S/Z). In questioning the position of the narrative in relation to the producer and consumer of organizing, this essay challenges the role of consumer sovereignty that makes consumers the sole authors of organizing.

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Boje, David (2006). Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc. (2006). Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc. Tamara: Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, 5(3), 81-85. (Original work published 2006)

MLA style

Boje, David. „Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply To Krizanc”. 2006. Tamara: Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, t. 5, nr 3, 2006, ss. 81-85.

Chicago style

Boje, David. „Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply To Krizanc”. Tamara: Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 5, nr 3 (2006): 81-85.