en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 11.2020 
Tom 28 
Numer 3

Business Models of “New Cooperativism” Organizations as an Instrument of Sustainable Development Stimulation

Paweł Zawiślak
Kozminski University

11.2020 28 (3) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.31


Purpose: The article presents business models developed in organizations of the “new cooperativism” trend, whose application leads to a bottom-up solution of important social problems at the local level and, in a broader perspective, stimulation of sustainable development.

Methodology: The adopted methodology uses a qualitative approach. The research was conducted in the form of case studies of four organizations following “new cooperativism,” based on in-depth interviews, observations, and analyses of organizational documents and various types of publicly available materials.

Findings: The study showed that “new cooperativism” organizations use in their business models the old practices developed by classical cooperatives, which work well in today’s conditions and have the potential to provide a positive impact on important socioeconomic dysfunctions, which can be fully implemented through modern technologies.

Research Limitations: The limitations typical of the case study method entail the uncertainty of results replication, which disallows their broad generalization. However, the obtained results indicate the need to conduct a scientific diagnosis of emerging collaborative grassroots organizations and the importance of their participation in the three-sector economic concept of the state.

Originality: The article and its conclusions are based on empirical research of the practical effectiveness of business models used in organizations of the “new cooperativism” trend.


  1. Abramowski, E. (2012). Braterstwo, solidarność, współdziałanie. Pisma spółdzielcze i stowarzyszeniowe. Warszawa: Obywatele obywatelom. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abramowski, E. (1924). Ideje społeczne kooperatyzmu. Warszawa: Związek Polskich Stowarzyszeń Spożywców [Google Scholar]
  3. Amit, R. and Zott, Ch. (2017). Business Model Innovation: How to Create Value in a Digital World. GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/gfkmir-2017-0003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Antonowicz, M. and Jastrzębowski, S. (2018). Innovative Models of Supply Chain Management. Central European Management Journal, 26(2), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.225. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arend, R. (2013). The business model: Present and future – beyond a skeuomorph. Strategic Organization, 11(4), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013499636. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bardhi, F. and Eckhardt, G.M. (2012). Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing.” Journal of Consumer Research. December. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker, J.A. (1997). The Mondragon Model A New Pathway for the Twenty-First Century. In: R. Beckhard, M., Goldsmith, M. and Hesselbein, F. (1997). 11. In The organization of the future. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bilewicz, A. (2015). W stronę gospodarki społecznie zanurzonej? Kooperatywy spożywcze w Polsce. PhD thesis, ISS UW. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bilewicz, A. and Błesznowski, B. (2016). Nadchodzi nowy kooperatyzm. Notes na 6 tygodni, 108. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bilewicz, A. and Śpiewak, R. (2015). Enclaves of activism and taste: Consumer cooperatives in Poland as alternative food networks. Socio.hu, 3, 145–166. https://doi.org/10.18030/socio.hu.2015en.145. [Google Scholar]
  11. Błesznowski, B. (red.).(2014). Kooperatyzm, spółdzielczość, demokracja. Wybór pism. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UW. https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323515067 [Google Scholar]
  12. Botsman, R. and Rogers, R. (2010). What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  13. Burkitt, I.(2019). Alienation and emotion: social relations and estrangement in contemporary capitalism. Emotions and Society, 1(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15580836411841 [Google Scholar]
  14. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches. London: SAGE Publications Inc. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dacin, P.A., Dacin, M.T. and Matear, M. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don’t Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37 [Google Scholar]
  16. Davies, R. (2017). Uber loses appeal in UK employment rights case. The Guardian, 10.11.2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/10/uber-loses-appeal-employment-rights-workers. [Google Scholar]
  17. Drucker, P. (1992). Innowacja i przedsiębiorczość. Praktyka i zasady. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fedosov, A., Lampinen, A., Dillahunt, T., Light, A. and Cheshire, C. (2019). Cooperativism and Human-Computer Interaction. CHI EA ‘19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311751. [Google Scholar]
  19. Florczak, E. (2011). Przedsiębiorstwo społeczne w teorii konfirmy. Kwartalnik Nauk O Przedsiębiorstwie, 20(3), 40–47. https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KNoP/article/view/2077. [Google Scholar]
  20. Geissinger, A., Laurell, Ch., Oberg, Ch. and Sandstrom, Ch. (2019). How sustainable is the sharing economy? On the sustainability connotations of sharing economy platforms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.196. [Google Scholar]
  21. George, G. and Bock, A. (2009). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hausner, J. (2007). Systemowe usytuowanie ekonomii społecznej. In: Hausner, J. (ed.), Ekonomia społeczna a rozwój. Kraków: Małopolska Szkoła administracji Publicznej Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hausner, J., Laurisz, N. and Mazur, S. (2008). Przedsiębiorstwo społeczne – konceptualizacja. In: J. Hausner (ed.), Zarządzanie podmiotami ekonomii społecznej. Kraków: Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jemielniak, D. (2012). Badania jakościowe. Metody i narzędzia. Vol 2. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jemielniak, D. and Przegalińska, A. (2020). Collaborative Society. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11587.001.0001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kardas, M. (2016). Pojęcia i typy modeli biznesowych. In: K. Klincewicz (ed.), Zarządzanie, organizacje i organizowanie – przegląd perspektyw teoretycznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kostera, M. (2020). By odkupić duszę zarządzania. Obywatel. https://magazynkontakt.pl/by-odkupic-dusze-zarzadzania/ [Google Scholar]
  28. Koźmiński, A.K.(2004). Zarządzanie w warunkach niepewności. Podręcznik dla zaawansowanych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [Google Scholar]
  29. Martin, Ch. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121(2016), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027 [Google Scholar]
  30. Morozov, E. (2015). Szwindel Ubera, kant Facebooka. Gazeta Wyborcza Magazyn Świąteczny. https://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/1,124059,18111508,Szwindel_Ubera__kant_Facebooka.html. [Google Scholar]
  31. Munoz, P., Kimmitt, J. and Dimov, D. (2019). Packs, Troops and Herds: Prosocial Cooperatives and Innovation in the New Normal. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3), 470–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12542. [Google Scholar]
  32. Noga, A. (2009). Teorie przedsiębiorstw. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nowak, E. (2016). Analiza kosztów w ocenie działalności przedsiębiorstwa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo CeDeWu. [Google Scholar]
  34. Okraska, R. (2014). Od samopomocy do wizji nowego ustroju. In: B. Błesznowski (red.), Kooperatyzm, spółdzielczość, demokracja. Wybór pism. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UW. [Google Scholar]
  35. Porter, M. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review. November–December. [Google Scholar]
  36. Porter, M. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review. March. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rains, P. (2019). Worker Cooperatives: The Default Alternative to Predatory United States Capitalism. Socialism and Democracy, 33(1), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2019.1653627 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rahman, S.K. and Thelen, K. (2019). The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism. Politics & Society, 47(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219838932. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rifkin, J. (2011). Trzecia rewolucja przemysłowa. Warszawa: Sonia Draga. [Google Scholar]
  40. Russo, A. (2020). Hyper-globalization and capitalism: socio-political effects of the international commerce. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2020-0128 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rutka, R. and Wróbel P. (eds.) (2012). Organizacja zachowań zespołowych. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sennett, R. (2013). Razem. Rytuały, zalety i zasady współpracy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza SA. [Google Scholar]
  43. Scholz, T. and Schneider, N. (eds.) (2016). Ours to hack and own. The rise of platform cooperativism, a new vision for the future of work and a fairer internet. New York: OR Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv62hfq7. [Google Scholar]
  44. Spicker P., Álvarez Leguizamón S. and Gordon D. (2007). Poverty: An International Glossary. London: Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  45. Spijker, A. van’t (2014). The New Oil: Using Innovative Business Models to turn Data Into Profit. New York: Technics Publications. [Google Scholar]
  46. Thugutt, S. (1945). Spółdzielnia spożywców w Rochdale i zasady roczdelskie. Wykłady o spółdzielczości. London: Towarzystwo Kooperatystów Polskich w Wielkiej Brytanii. [Google Scholar]
  47. Walczak, W. (2013). Failures of Corporate Governance in Housing Cooperatives – Case Study. Central European Management Journal, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.72. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vieta, M. (2010). The New Cooperativism. A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action. 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.72 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vieta, M. (2014). New Co-operativism in Latin America: Implications for Cuba. In: S. Novković and H. Veltmeyer (eds.), Co-operativism and Local Development in Cuba: An Agenda for Democratic Social Change. Boston: Wydawnictwo BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004361720_005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vieta, M. (2014). The stream of self-determination and autogestión: Prefiguring alternative economic realities. Ephemera. Theory and politics in organization, 14(4), 781–809. [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Zawiślak, Paweł A. (2020). Business Models of “New Cooperativism” Organizations as an Instrument of Sustainable Development Stimulation. (2020). Business Models of “New Cooperativism” Organizations as an Instrument of Sustainable Development Stimulation. Central European Management Journal, 28(3), 168-195. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.31 (Original work published 11.2020n.e.)

MLA style

Zawiślak, Paweł A.. „Business Models Of “New Cooperativism” Organizations As An Instrument Of Sustainable Development Stimulation”. 11.2020n.e. Central European Management Journal, t. 28, nr 3, 2020, ss. 168-195.

Chicago style

Zawiślak, Paweł A.. „Business Models Of “New Cooperativism” Organizations As An Instrument Of Sustainable Development Stimulation”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 28, nr 3 (2020): 168-195. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.31.