en pl
en pl

Central European Management Journal

Zobacz wydanie
Rok 2017 
Tom 25 
Numer 4

Motivational Factors to be a Mentor in Formal Mentoringin Organisations. The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivationin the Propensity to Mentor

Wioletta Małota
Collegium Civitas

2017 25 (4) Central European Management Journal

DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.210

Zawartość artykułu

Abstrakt

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the motivational factors of propensity to be a mentor by managers in a formal mentoring in organisations. The author addresses the importance of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and examines their relation to the propensity to mentor. The second objective was to critically analyse whether managers deciding to mentor do so for egoistic or altruistic reasons – for self-benefts or others’ benefts. The third task concentrates on the role of extrinsic motivational factors, especially additional remuneration on the propensity to mentor.

Methodology: For this study, the author applied quantitative research among Polish managers working in medium and large size organisations. The author examines the correlation between dependent and independent variables and addresses the impact of control variables as moderators.

Findings: First, the results support managers’ high propensity to mentor in a formal mentoring programme. Second, the study fnds that intrinsic motivation was the salient factor taken into consideration in the propensity to mentor, whereas extrinsic motivation exerted very little influence. Third, the study confrms a pattern of motivational pluralism based on the fact that both kinds of intrinsic motivators in the propensity to mentor – for the beneft of oneself or others – appear equally signifcant. Fourth, the research fnds that additional remuneration does not motivate managers to mentor. No moderation effects of age, gender, kind of organisation and carrier level on the propensity to mentor were observed.

Research implications: The confrmation of Polish managers’ high propensity to mentor contradicts conventional wisdom in some organisations that managers overloaded with work are unwilling to mentor. The fnding that managers want to be mentors may encourage organisations to implement mentoring programmes without fear of a shortage of prospective mentors. Based on observed behaviour and the importance of motivational factors, this study delivers valuable guidelines on the recruitment and selection of mentors for HR departments. The results that managers exclusively follow intrinsic motivation in the propensity to mentor should be considered in designing the methodology of mentors’ selection.

Powiązania

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderfer C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness and growth. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, T.D. (2003). Mentoring others: A dispositional and motivational approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62: 144–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00046-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, T.D. (2007). Mentoring relationships from the perspective of the mentor. In: B.R. Ragins and K.E. Kram (eds.), The Handbook of Mentoring at Work: Theory, Research and Practice: 123-147. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, T.D., Lentz, E. and Day, R. (2006). Career Success Outcomes Associated With Mentoring Others. Journal of Career Development, 32(3): 272–285, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305282942 [Google Scholar]
  6. Allen, T.D. and Eby L.T. (eds.) (2007). The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring. A Multiply Perspectives Approach. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA. [Google Scholar]
  7. Allen, T.D. and Poteet, M.L. and Burroughs, S. (1997). The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51: 70–89. [Google Scholar]
  8. Allen, T.D., Russel J.E. and Maetzke, S.B. (1997a). Formal Peer Mentoring: Factors Related to Proteges’ Satisfactions and Willingness to Mentor Others. Group and Organizational Management, 21: 488–507, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601197224005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ambrose, M.L. and Kulik, C.T. (1999). Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s, Journal of Management, 25(3): 231–292, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500302 [Google Scholar]
  10. Aryee, S., Chay, Y.W. and Chew J. 1996. The motivation to mentor among managerial employeess. Group and Organization Management, 21(3): 261–277, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601196213002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Batson, C.D. and Show L.L. (1991). Encouraging words concerning the evidence for altruism. Psychological Inquiry, 2: 159–168, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_17 [Google Scholar]
  12. Becker G.S. (1975). Human capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Beddoes-Jones, F. and Miller, J. (2006). “Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness? International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4(2): 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 497–529, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandler, D.E. and Kram, K.E. (2005). Mentoring and Developmental Networks in the New Career Context. In: H. Gunz and M. Peiperl (red.), Handbook of Career Studies. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chao, G.T., Walz, P.M. and Gardner, P.D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with non mentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45: 619–636, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00863.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Cranwell-Ward, J., Bassons P. and Gover S. (2004). Mentoring. A Henley Review of Best Practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. [Google Scholar]
  18. Daresh, J.C. (2004). Mentoring school leaders: Professional promise or predictable problems? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4): 495–517, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04267114 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deci E.L., Koestner, R., Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 627–668, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 [Google Scholar]
  20. Eby, L.T. and McManus, S.E. (2004). The protégé’s role in negative mentoring experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65: 255–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eby, L.T. and Ragins, B.R. (2008). Mentors’ Perceptions of Negative Mentoring Experiences: Scale Development and Nomological Validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2): 358–373, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.358 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ehrich, L.C. and Hansford, B. (1999). Mentoring: pros and cons for HRM. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37(3): 92–107. Pobrano z: eprints.gut.edu.au (12.03.2014). [Google Scholar]
  23. Emmerik, H.V., Baugh, S.G. and Euwema, M.C. (2005). Career Development International, 10(4): 310–324, https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430510609145 [Google Scholar]
  24. Erikson E. H. 1963. Childhood and society (2 ed.). New York: W. W. Morton. [Google Scholar]
  25. Feldman, D.C. (1999). Toxic mentors or toxic protégés? A critical re-examination of dysfunctional mentoring. Human Resource Management Review, 9: 247–278, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00021-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Finkelstein, L.M., Poteet, M.L. (2007). Formal Mentoring Programs. In: T.D. Allen and L.T. Eby (eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring. A Multiply Perspectives Approach. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gagne, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aube, C.., Morin, E. and Malorni, A. (2010). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4): 628–648, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698 [Google Scholar]
  28. Higgins, M.C. (2001). Career change: a social influence perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 595–618. [Google Scholar]
  29. Higgins, M.C., Kram K.E. (2001). Reconceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Developmental Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 264–288, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.104 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacoby, D. (1989). Rewards make the mentor. Personnel, 66(12): 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kram K.E. (1985). Mentoring at Work. Maryland: University Press of America. [Google Scholar]
  32. Maslow, A.H. (1943). Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological Review, 50: 372–383, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar]
  33. McKimm, J., Jollie, C., Hatter, M. (2007). Mentoring: Theory and Practice. Obtained from: http://www.faculty.londondeanery.ac.uk (19.07.13). [Google Scholar]
  34. Megginson, D., Clutterbuck, D., Garvey, B., Strokes, P. and Garrett-Harris, R. (2006). Mentoring In Action: A Practical Guide for Managera. Kogan Page. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mullen, E. (1994). Framing the mentoring relationship in an information exchange. Human Resource Management Review, 4: 257–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(94)90015-9 [Google Scholar]
  36. Newby, T.J. and Heide, A. (1992). The value of mentoring. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(4): 2–15, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1992.tb00562.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Noe, R.A. (1988. An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41: 457-479, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00638.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Levinson, D.J., Darrow, C.N., Klein, E.B., Levinson, M.A. and McKee, B. (1978). Season’s of a man’s life. New York: Knopf. [Google Scholar]
  39. Passmore, J., Peterson, D.B. and Freire, T. (eds.) (2013). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Coaching and Mentoring. The Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, USA. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ragins, B.R., Cotton, J.L., Miller, J.S. (2000). Marginal Mentoring: The Effects of Type of Mentor, Quality of Relationship, and Program Design on Work and Career Attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1177–1194, https://doi.org/10.2307/1556344 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ragins, B.R. and Kram, K.E. (eds.) (2007). The Handbook of Mentoring at Work: Theory, Research, and Practice. Thousend Oaks, CA, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ragins, B.R. and Scandura, T.A. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 957–971, https://doi.org/10.2307/256606 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ragins, B.R. and Scandura, T.A. (1999). Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 493–509, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<493::AID-JOB894>3.0.CO;2-T [Google Scholar]
  44. Ramaswami, A. and Dreher, G.F. (2010). The benefits associated with workplace mentoring relationships. In: T.D. Allen and L.T. Eby (eds.), Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach. London: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ryan, R. and Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 54–67, https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 [Google Scholar]
  46. Scandura, T.A. and Schriesheim, C.A. (1994). Leader – member exchange and supervisory career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1588-1602, https://doi.org/10.2307/256800 [Google Scholar]
  47. Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25: 173–180, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stokes, P., Merrick, L. (2013). Designing Mentoring Schemes for Organizations. In: Passmore, J., Peterson, J., Freire, D.B. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Coaching and Mentoring. The Wiley-Blackwell, Maiden, USA. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sullivan, R. and Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration. Journal of Management, 35(6): 1542–1570, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350082 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tay, L. and Diener, E. (2011). Needs and Subjective Well-being Around the World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2): 354–365, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023779 [Google Scholar]
  51. Waha, M.A. and Bridwell, L.G. (1976). Maslow Reconsidered. A Review of Research on the Need Hierarchy Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15: 212–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90038-6 [Google Scholar]

Kompletne metadane

Cytowanie zasobu

APA style

Małota, Wioletta (2017). Małota, W.. (2017). Motivational Factors to be a Mentor in Formal Mentoringin Organisations. The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivationin the Propensity to Mentor. Central European Management Journal, 25(4), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.210 (Original work published 2017)

MLA style

Małota, Wioletta. Małota, W.. „Motivational Factors To Be A Mentor In Formal Mentoringin Organisations. The Role Of Intrinsic And Extrinsic Motivationin The Propensity To Mentor”. 2017. Central European Management Journal, t. 25, nr 4, 2017, ss. 119-144.

Chicago style

Małota, Wioletta. Małota, Wioletta . „Motivational Factors To Be A Mentor In Formal Mentoringin Organisations. The Role Of Intrinsic And Extrinsic Motivationin The Propensity To Mentor”. Central European Management Journal, Central European Management Journal, 25, nr 4 (2017): 119-144. doi:10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.210.

Prawa autorskie

copyright info

CC-BY-NC-ND

Podobne artykuły:

Brak podobnych.